this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
100 points (97.2% liked)

Not The Onion

15588 readers
1852 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 44 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I dont understand these numbers, or the value of anything at all it appears

[–] radix@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As online commentary states: I sold my car to myself for $1 million.

The numbers don't mean anything at all.

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 7 points 4 days ago

Rich people don't pay taxes

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And now you understand the stock market. Everything is worth something, but it's only worth what someone will pay for it. If the richest man in the world says he owns 7, the stock soars! But in reality, the stock isn't worth anything more than it was before. There's just more dupees in the market now.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

1,000,000,000 dollars

This is worth 1,000,000,000 dollars if someone buys it at that price.

Stocks, art, wine, same valuation technique. Slap a sticker price and if someone buys it, that's the value. Welcome to capitalism.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 days ago

For reference, he bought it for $44B.

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Acquisition_of_Twitter_by_Elon_Musk

But this one doesn't really mean anything since they're both owned by him.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 days ago

Another money laundering scheme.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 24 points 5 days ago

xAI and X's futures are intertwined — they will fall together into the howling void of pain, madness, and leveraged buyout debt, leaving Elon with only his $45 billion dollars for consolation.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He's trying so hard to salvage that site.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wait so X is worth more with the Nazi owning it in full?

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 44 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I suppose because he can at a moment's notice gut the SEC and presumably now that X is incorporated in Texas and I have to assume xAI is as well(?) there's no federal or state fraud investigation likely.

Feels quaint that Trump in 2017 even went to the trouble of filling a table with blank papers to give the appearance of being concerned about conflicts of interest, and this outright self-dealing corruption is happening daily while nobody in power even talks about it.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Oh I know. I just hate he inflated its value with its hate.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

xAi got ripped off I hear x isn’t worth the servers it runs on

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago

Sleight of hand.