this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
290 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22613 readers
4312 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 28 points 3 days ago

European countries tell trump to take his tiny mushroom dick and shove it up his shit encrusted asshole.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 128 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Another day, another go fuck yourselves Americans.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 35 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Just the 31% that voted for him.

[–] squishy@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago

Nah, as a fellow American that's not how it works. Their shit is our shit too even if you didn't want the shit. You can definitely say that to other Americans tho.

When you hear anger towards the country, don't take it personally, they have every right to be angry at America and it's not really fair to jump in and say "but not me!". Let them vent, if you need to say something agree with them lol

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What about the 36% that didn’t bother to vote?

[–] oxysis@lemm.ee 29 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The sizable chunk of democrats who aren’t doing fucking anything or don’t care because it doesn’t affect them personally

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fuck magnets too.

How the fuck do they even work?

[–] oxysis@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I’m more concerned with how they managed to make rocks thinks than how they made rocks be attracted to one another

Trans-rocks. When did magnets become woke?!

/satire

They engrave magic glyphs on them bro.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Americans voted for Republicans to control all branches of the government.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 days ago

Abs the percentage that stayed home or protest voted

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago

It's clear that his ambition is to be the dictator of the world.

Trump can go fuck himself.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago (2 children)

France is an interesting choice as the first ones to threaten. They might be the country most willing to tell America to fuck off and spend an evening lighting Teslas on fire.

DEI initiatives don’t really exist there like they do in the United States. Their constitution already bans employers from making distinctions based on race, gender, religion, etc. The closest thing France has that I know of is a requirement for corporate boards to be 40% women. They aren’t going to change that law because Trump threw a hissy fit.

Plus, DEI doesn’t even really mean anything specific in the United States anymore. It’s just a dog whistle (like “woke”) Republicans use to signal that they’re racist and sexist and stir up racial animus. They use it when it doesn’t even make sense. Trump blamed “DEI hires” when an ARMY helicopter crashed into a passenger jet even though all the pilots and the air traffic controllers were white men. He blamed the LA wildfires on DEI.

[–] SexualPolytope 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

DEI is basically the modern n word.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I was going to say, it's not always a derogatory word. Those who are still aligned with DEI don't use it that way. So yeah, I guess it is.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

DEI in the US just means not being a racist, misogynistic, *-phobic piece of shit.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 60 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Europeans are beholden to US policy."

lol ok.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago

What a putz. EU, U do U.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago (3 children)

That's a good way to have foreign companies that are currently invested in the US to pull all of their investments and fire everyone working for them over here.

Everything he does is just making us more isolated from the world.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 32 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I'm increasingly seeing that as the point. I've believed since 2016 that he's either intentionally or being easily manipulated to serve Russia's interests and obviously I'm not alone here.

But at this point, dismantling US soft political power, military power, economic power - every action Trump is taking is directly damaging the US with no apparent self-interested payoff. Sure, it's plausibly deniable and just on the edge of conspiracy-sounding to the public and mainstream, but the theory that Trump acting to destroy the US on behalf of Russia is currently the best fit to the evidence.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

100% agree. He's been a Russian agent from the start working towards the dismantling of the US in every way. Including, I think, trying to push the country so far that it splits up so the US is no more. Putin's revenge on the US "winning" the Cold war.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Make America Go Alone!

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

The flip side of that is that Putin deserves the Gaddafi treatment for having inflicted Trump on us (even without his aggression against Ukraine).

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is the lens through which I see his actions, too. I have one additional twist, which is if it doesn’t benefit him personally, it needs to go. Even if it’s replaced with something 10% the value, he now owns 100% of that 10%.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 1 points 3 days ago

@Xanthobilly @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein partly this. Possibly also dementia + power-crazed wannabe dictator I suspect

Everything he does is just making us more isolated from the world.

That is why tariffs make sense. If you were preparing the US for WW3 then you would do exactly what Trump is doing.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He's stupid enough to believe that autarky is a desirable situation, without actually knowing what the word means.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It can be under certain circumstances, its generally desireable for a country to be able to feed itself for example, and being able to produce products yourself is useful when negotiating trade agreements. The problem is when autarky becomes conflated with isolationism.

[–] zenharbinger@lemmy.world 55 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 49 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I've come to learn that when they say "small government" they don't mean that what the government touches is small and focused. They mean that the size is physically small but have the same, if not more, power than a large government body.

Basically they want fascism and a monarchy.

[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I found a similar thing with "small business". Right wing neo-liberal conservatives love to go on about small business - but their notion of what that is does is very different from ours.

The right wing idea of a "small business" is 100 employees and a $40 million turn over. They aren't thinking of a general store or a diner that a family has owned for three generations.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When I was a right winger and had some more connections to musicians here in Hungary, some came up with the idea that the government should allocate some funds to pay musicians to use Hungarian made equipment, especially as some popped out in 2010 expecting a "raise in nationalism and love for domestic products", so they don't have to use foreign ones in exchange of endorsement money.

The reception? We got called communists for barring them from buying "quality branded" products from the west, and they told us the horrors of buying Tisza shoes instead of Adidas too...

[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In the late 1990s in Australia we had similar attempts to promote domestic products in the supermarket. As a kid at the time I questioned why we'd buy local when global brands were higher quality and more familiar to me, especially as I've lived in Europe and Asia.

For me personally - part of the issue with nationalism movements promoting domestic production that is that they are often tied with racism/xenophobia and are often used as a ruse by some greedy person to promote their own business to the local market. They get people angry which creates free publicity and unearned brand loyalty.

In Australia, we have a number of very loud and outspoken racist politicians who allegedly believe in this country and want it to do well, but when you look at their actions they're all wining and dining billionaires and only looking to attack Aboriginal or foreign people, not uplift all Australians to a brighter better future.

It sounds to me like the program you were a part of had noble intentions, but without knowing more details I have to assume it could easily have been affected some of the issues I've mentioned.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah, the small business is just one guy in an office trying to get government contracts which then get subcontracted to the actual people doing the thing, but for less.

[–] bradv@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's no smaller government than a dictatorship

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Small enough to fit snuggly between you and your rights.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Or else what, he will double tariff them?

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago

Double-secret-tariffs!

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

You better listen otherwise I'll crash my economy!

load more comments
view more: next ›