this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
1231 points (98.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

19685 readers
1412 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The idea feels like sci-fi because you're so used to it, imagining ads gone feels like asking to outlaw gravity. But humanity had been free of current forms of advertising for 99.9% of its existence. Word-of-mouth and community networks worked just fine. First-party websites and online communities would now improve on that.

The traditional argument pro-advertising—that it provides consumers with necessary information—hasn't been valid for decades.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I would like meaningful regulation on advertising. Something to the effect of "STOP BLASTING MY FACE WITH ADS EVERY CHANCE YOU GET YOU SCUMFUCKERS"

There is a gas station nearby who runs non-stop unmutable ads. I don't go to that gas station anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 40 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I've always thought of it as waste of our mental resources. But pollution describes it even better.

Pollution specifically engineered by psychologists to maximize its impact.

[–] Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Emotional pollution Mind pollution SOUL POLLUTION

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] midori_matcha@lemmy.world 29 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"THE JOY OF NOT BEING SOLD ANYTHING"

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 14 hours ago

Freedom from mind flaying (advertising) !

I concur.

Some places limit advertising more than others. Banned on footpaths and dangerous spots. What about sales persons? How do you brand a product? I think it would have to be well defined.

I am ok with technical information being provided by a staff member. So much shit is peddled through marketing. As the scientist designing the product, I want to tell them the truth, customers love the truth, in this regard. I think banning deception and conning further would be a good way. And fuck this debt model of economics. And how about universities turn back into noble education organisations, not cocksucking psuedo-businesses.

I think govts/politicians like keeping the vague open because they use it, too. Their propaganda departments are cucked with good fact checking teams.

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 74 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

The economy should exist to serve real needs of the people. All that advertisement does is create a fake desire for consumption which simply wastes respurces.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There is some awareness effect, too. If I like burgers and see a listing for a new burger place in my neighborhood, learning about a potential new place I'd like to include in my going-out rotation feels like a win. If I need a home repair and see a neighbor with a yard sign for a local contractor, that's helpful in compiling a list of potential companies to check out.

[–] Grazed@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

What about word of mouth? If I want to find a good place to eat, I find asking a local "hey what's the best restaurant around here?" to yield way better results than ads.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago

No, advertising is useful to small businesses and big. What needs to happen, is actual thoughtful regulation, as with everything else.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Oh what a world. But it would NEVER happen. Might as well wish for super powers.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Certain types of advertising is illegal where I'm from. In particular: political adverts of any kind, and ads that target children.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 39 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Advertising is illegal in São Paulo. At least, outdoor advertising is illegal.

No ads

Look closely -- what don't you see?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 11 hours ago

Geraffes are dumb. Stupid long horses.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Sanguine_Sasquatch@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

Well obviously, we all know birds aren't real

[–] jonjuan@programming.dev 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There are ads on the very right side, middle, of this picture

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca -2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

You'd put a lot of people out of work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 17 hours ago
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 47 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

It arbitrary pollutes any environment it’s conducted in, and causes secondary harms to non-participants by incentivising insecure hoarding of private information with the intent to better target individuals.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The privacy thing isn't necessarily part of advertising though.

Advertising can be as complex as targeted algorithms built using harvested information and even AI bullshit, or as simple as a sign by the road saying "next right for MegaBurger" or even a small box with "Bob's autoglass repair" in the paper.

It's the volume and invasiveness that's a problem. Ads in your mailbox, ads in your inbox, ads on your streaming service and when you turn on your Roku etc etc acting as blockers to the content you're actually looking for.

I'm totally cool too go back to having an "autoglass" or "plumbers" section in paper and online yellow Pages etc, which target people actually looking for a service. I'm also cool with places which I subscribe to advertising me deals I might like (not so much signing me up for their shit the first time I buy from them), but the shoving crap in people's face and information harvesting that needs to end.

Hell, I even have a collection of saved ads that were clever and entertaining I'd share with people, yet most companies go for volume (both audible and amount) over substance

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty dumb article if you spend more than a second thinking about this issue.

The entire historical premise that we "didn't have ads" is so fucking incorrect and reeks of appeal to nature. Yeah we didn't have tv ads but we had monarchs and elite that played the same role. How is paying of some sleezy high up salesman is different from a Google search ad? If anything the latter is more ethically apt.

I'd take democracy with ads over whatever the fuck that alternative timeline that polices "unpaid word of mouth"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kruddman@lemmy.world 36 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ads should be paying me for using my bandwidth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Susurrus@lemm.ee 22 points 19 hours ago

Personally I've been of the opinion that advertising, at least in its current form, should be illegal since I was about 15. I'm not 100% sure if it should be completely illegal, or just very heavily regulated. Even after all those years, I'm still baffled nearly every day that people around me seem okay with current advertising.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

I think regulation is better than abolishing it.

With most initiatives that have been made in good faith to avoid bad actors, it will usually hit the little guy the hardest.

In my country, for example, you can apply for grants for your business for developing your business. Great right? Wrong. The bureaucracy is so crazy that small businesses, whom this grant was aimed towards, cannot feasibly take the grant. It is too expensive for them to go through all the steps to get the money for the developmental aspect of the business that they would lose money as a business and not be able to recoup their losses. The grant money are so small and aren't allowed to be used to run the business at all that it simply isn't worth it to even try. You would essentially have to work for free for days or weeks in some cases to get this tiny portion that will now sink your company instead of developing it.

However, a big business with many employees and time and money to spare, could easily apply for the grant and get it without a sweat, despite them not needing it at all.

That is how I'd see a potential ban of ads affect the market. The big businesses who got to benefit from ads and marketing in the past will continue to do well because people know them while any and all new start ups and smaller businesses would drown and go bankrupt due to them not being allowed to make people aware of their business.

It is a bit too utopic for my taste to suggest a ban. But regulation would be a good thing in my opinion.

So this could be interpreted as ban big advertising from ads?

I think ultimately tightening of ad standards is likely the middle ground. I for one am sick of the blatant bulletin. As an industrial chemist even the freakin chemical companies do it. Like buddy, I'm a chemist, I need to know what it is to use it properly. I have now started running a campaign where if they don't cough up the deets, I (in consultancies) don't recommend the use of their products.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 26 points 20 hours ago (21 children)

Oh please yes

Put a 100% stop to advertising but also marketing altogether.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 26 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

what if we made capitalism illegal? because all of the bullshit like advertising is symptomatic. the root cause is capitalism. western civilization has to be reset entirely. and it will never get done through protesting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 47 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

That'd be great, but the "how" is a much harder question. What counts as advertising? Because there's a reason Google, Meta, etc. have their fingers in so many different industries: every single thing that gets attention could be leveraged for advertising, even the act of suppressing mentions of competitors.

Should I be able to say "X product has been great, I recommend it!" Only if I'm not being paid, you say? How could you possibly know?

As discussed in the article, "propaganda" is illegal. So any discussion about how terrible trump is would also be illegal. Propaganda doesn't mean false, it just means it's trying to convince you of something. An advertisement. Heck, the article itself could be considered a form of advertising for legislation.

It's just so trivial of a concept to say, but the moment you spend any amount of time thinking about it, it falls apart. It's like trying to ban the Ship of Theseus from a club.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

I'm just going to take this opportunity to remind everyone that you can and should donate to your Mastodon and Lemmy instances, even if it's just $5 a month. That's how we band together to keep these platforms ad-free, and I don't know about you all, but I love that my mind isn't being manipulated here.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't get a lot of ads already, and I could honestly use more in terms of new games and movies coming out. Word of mouth doesn't work great for obscure things either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›