this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
109 points (99.1% liked)

news

23943 readers
865 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jizzong@hexbear.net 50 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can't deport you based on your speech (thankfully this isn't vague at all) but can deport you for the crime of not having commited any crime.

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 29 points 5 days ago

It's like the old classic: Can't be fired for discrimination, but can be fired for any reason

[–] Cummunism@hexbear.net 47 points 5 days ago (3 children)

the year is 2026, SCOTUS in a 6-3 decision declares that Trump can actually do whatever he wants.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 38 points 5 days ago

in the year 2024 they already decided that

[–] MiraculousMM@hexbear.net 32 points 5 days ago

They're basically already doing this anyway

US V Trump hours

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 37 points 5 days ago

It's always fun seeing someone grapple with "we have a long and storied juridical history of precedents" vs. "what if the state just does it" but this gets especially stupid considering the US runs on common law and once the first judge says all of that's legal you get to colour change basically every square there and just throw the circles away

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 33 points 5 days ago

i would love to know exactly why the new york crimes, rag it may be, thanks that being deported without being convicted of a crime is more legal than deporting someone based on speech. because there is a subtle difference there, and it's also entirely inappropriate to communicate that with a pithy graph in the paper of record. they're just justifying slavery and neofascism

[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago
[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 27 points 5 days ago

again if there's no due process just throw this whole chart out because as it turns out your status as a citizen can change based on the whims of the agent and after they deport you "oops out of our jurisdiction now". most americans don't care unless it happens to someone they care about because they look white and "no one would deport a white person we belong here"

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 17 points 5 days ago

"Unlikely" aka yes but we will pretend like it's a no

[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Trump should deport the New York Crimes to the bottom of the ocean

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

They should voluntarily join the DoGE watchlist. That should be more than enough.

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

“Rights” that can be revoked whenever Trump feels like it lmao

[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

If something 100% happens, how is it “unlikely?” Or are they just going off of the statistical unlikelihood of each single individual reader being deported based on speech and having committed no crime?

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

Nytimes: "you know who won't be the deported the lib reading this."

[–] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago

How the fuck are you supposed to interpret any of this? I know that's the point but this is a new low

[–] miz@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Mahmoud Khalil

[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago

Wow, not even twisting the facts. Just plain old lying.

At least the NYCrimes has a precedent.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

Its just not fucking true lmao ICE has already done both to fully naturalised citizens.

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago

It used to be that you could deport immigrants for no reason whatsoever, but Trump wants to STILL HAVE THAT BE POSSIBLE!!!11!

If ever there was proof that Trump is just the racism continuity candidate with extra headlines.

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago

RACIsm chart kelly

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago

Data visualisation is my passion

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago

⭕ Yes, actually, when you get down to it