this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
20 points (83.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

32582 readers
1072 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JamonBear@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Advertising.

Cause it's driving over-consumption, by flooding people brains with shit ideas, turning them into idiots in the process.

[–] Outwit1294@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

Most beneficial thing is to choose a more minimalist lifestyle. Buy only if you need it, use only if you must and discard only if you absolutely have to. These principles can be applied to pretty much everything, from eating at a restaurant to buying clothes to using technology.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 3 points 7 hours ago
  • Energy demand to power heavy industry that we all use (steel, aluminum, chemicals, fertilizers)
    • I don’t see these going away, so it’d be best to make their processes greener by repurposing the carbon into ag products, then institute a viable carbon tax and offset the rest of their footprint
  • Use of concrete in construction
    • some promising technologies coming that crystallize the carbon and use it to self heal the concrete, carbon tax and offset the rest
  • Shipping
    • bring manufacturing closer to consumers, global environmental manufacturing and shipping standards, improve right to repair laws
  • Transportation
    • upgrade public transportation options where it makes economic sense to do so, make our cities and towns more people friendly instead of car friendly, raise the gas tax to fund these efforts. Reduce the amount of detached single family housing stock and encourage multi-family stock, particularly in cities.
  • Heating and cooling
    • incentivize heat pumps, add taxes to heating fuels and fossil energy plants to fund it. Start a major campaign to educate people to keep temperatures around 68 (winter) to 76 degrees (summer). And encourage use of ceiling fans.
[–] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 7 points 11 hours ago

The worst are wars imo. Massive usage of resources to build war machinery, massive destruction of infrastructure that used resources to build, massive usage of resources to clean up and rebuild... And it's usually not accounted for: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/warfares-climate-emissions-are-huge-but-uncounted/

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

If you own your home, you can drastically reduce your carbon.

  • installing solar to take energy off the grid
  • install a heat pump to generate heat and cool off of electricity
    • even if your grid is pure coal, this is still more efficient than burning your own gas
    • you can keep a gas furnace as a backup, look up "dual-fuel" systems
  • take transit whenever possible
  • if you are in a car dependent area, look into e-bikes and EVs. Even replacing just your commuter car can have huge impacts, you don't have to replace them all.
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 12 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

In the US it's roughly a tie between road transportation and energy generation (which lumps together both heat and electricity).

(Source: University of Michigan https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/sustainability-indicators/carbon-footprint-factsheet)

The global breakdown is similar: https://www.wri.org/insights/4-charts-explain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors

The solutions? Build mass transit, live in temperate climates, buy less stuff, ...? Honestly, I don't think we're not going to fix the problem with simple, local improvements (though by all means do what you can). There are global demographic forces to contend with. A century ago there were 2 billion people on earth. Now there are >8 billion, and in my lifetime we will surpass 9 billion. Many of those people are climbing out of poverty, and they want cars and air conditioners and all the other energy-intensive things that rich countries have enjoyed for a century. IMO we're going to need massive technological changes (like powering much of the world with nuclear very soon) in concert with a major population reduction and/or major changes to how people expect to live.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Nuclear is: very slow to make, very expensive, generates dangerous waste, invites proliferation.

Wind and solar are quick, relatively much cheaper, create little waste. The sun is forever.

Personal transportation needs a complete redesign. Burning fossil fuel at 20% efficiency (80% waste) to push a 4000lb. vehicle with a 200lb person in it is insane. Personal electric vehicles of 200-300 lbs tracking defined lanes at 20mph under computer control would take care of 80-90% of urban travel needs. And greatly reduce the number of roads needed.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I'm curious about how CO2 emissions from road construction in the US compares to that of Europe (adjusted for scale, obviously).

Concrete creates A LOT of CO2, and after driving a lot in both US and EU roads I can say that US roads involve a lot more concrete.

EDIT: Autocomplete and autocorrect is even worse at this than I am..

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Side note: If worrying about climate isn't enough, we can also worry about potential famine as we use up our fossil fuels.

We are able to feed the world because of the Haber-Bosch process. This process uses fossil fuels, usually natural gas, to produce synthetic ammonia for fertilizer. That fertilizer makes modern high-yield farming possible. "Without the Haber-Bosch process we would only be able to produce around two-thirds the amount of food we do today."
https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/cewctw-fritz-haber-and-carl-bosch-feed-the-world/

[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

The excess production of useless shit that nobody would need or want without the manipulation of advertising convincing us otherwise. Cell phones and such are nice, don't get me wrong, but do we need thousands of factories around the world churning out cargo ships full of cheap plastic junk that's designed to fail? No. It only exists because it makes some rich people even richer, and it's burning our planet down. If all that productive capacity was bent to the purpose of meeting peoples' actual needs/reasonable wants it would be a different matter.

[–] UndergroundGoblin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Going vegan was the easiest for me. The Co2 impact is massive!

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Obligatory “not vegan” but it’s hilarious to me when people ignore this.

Why do you think we cut down trees? Yes, more farmland. Farmland for what? To feed the cattle lol

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 13 hours ago

Having children

The last thing this world needs is more little consumers, especially living, or aspiring to, the western levels of consumption

[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago

#1 Making more humans #2 Making less humans

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 4 points 12 hours ago

There is no need to express opinions when we have good estimates for both your questions:

Sector by sector: where do global greenhouse gas emissions come from? -> https://ourworldindata.org/ghg-emissions-by-sector

individual solutions reviewed and assessed by Project Drawdown, including their relevant sector(s) and their impact on reducing heat-trapping gases -> https://drawdown.org/solutions/table-of-solutions

Both the links above are from a very interesting video on the topic that I suggest to take a look at. Also the whole channel is really interesting and well done -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReXaS4QausQ

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

For typical middle-class people (like the ones probably reading this), usually the single worst thing they do is flying. It's the only way to blow your personal carbon budget for the whole year in just a few hours.

That's at the individual level.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Bad

  • Voting for reactionary or fossil industry-backed parties and candidates
  • participating in local initiatives with climate action delay campaigns (eg "wind farm too loud", "PV lowers property prices", "bike lanes decrease spending")
  • keeping an internal combustion engine car,
  • keeping a fossil fueled heating/cooling system
  • paying for fossil fueled electricity plans
  • building with concrete
  • eating an omnivore diet with high waste lifestyle

Good

  • Bicycling
  • avoiding transportation
  • using public transit when necessary
  • decreasing load on electric grid
  • using self-made energy (ie PV, communal wind) at the right time (ie washing clothes on solar peak)
  • building with timber
  • eating a plant-based diet with low waste lifestyle
  • understanding LCAs of various materials and things
  • increasing participation in circular economy (recycling, waste separation, repair shops, 2nd hand/gift economy)
  • listening to actual science
[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly, capitalism.

The whole damn consume consume consume mindset. The idea that things are discarded instead of being repaired or properly recycled.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I don’t know, there are progressive capitalist countries which do pretty well, especially in Europe. And there are nominally communist countries which have the highest number of new coal plants and poorest environmental records on the planet.

saying “capitalism“ certainly does make people check out because that’s an irresolvable “problem”, compared to “See if you can start eating vegetarian one day a week and beef no more than once every two weeks”

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What Economic system would you change out for Capitalism?

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Communism or socialism.