this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
99 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24870 readers
3466 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration wants to end automatic birthright citizenship as enshrined in the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.

The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship, handing a major win to the government.

The court granted a request by the Trump administration to narrow the scope of nationwide injunctions imposed by judges so that they apply only to states, groups and individuals that sued. That means the birthright citizenship proposal can likely move forward at least in part in the states that challenged it as well as those that did not.

The court was divided on ideological lines, with conservatives in the majority and liberals in dissent.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Isn't this, like, catastrophic? Now, the government can basically do whatever it wants to people who don't have the resources to challenge it in court themselves, or live in a state that will do it on their behalf.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes. It is over. Democracy has fallen. Do with that as you will

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Eh, close, but that's still theoretically barely viable until the administration takes the affirmative step of saying "everybody in Denver can't vote but Rifle's cool", at which point anybody in Denver who can't get a lawyer and a court date is probably screwed,

So, yeah I guess the difference between rule of law being down for the count and democracy going into hibernation might be entirely semantic in practice

Do with that as you will

I'm going to believe a lot of people are about to realize what a bad idea this all is and keep telling people what a bad idea this all is and eventually live in a better world or get dumped in a mass grave for running my mouth. Good luck everybody.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll end up in that same dump im Sure..

Looks like a good day....

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I take comfort that at least I'll be in there with aliens and druids.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Want to hear something that would be a hoot if it weren't so depressing?

I asked ChatGPT "with no more birthright citizenship, how can i prove that I'm an American?" IT COULDN'T ANSWER. That's the first time I've ever seen that, and I use it a lot for work.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

My best guess is you'll now need to have your parents and maybe even grandparents birth certificates if they were US citizens. That would be solid proof. If you get to see a judge

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone in this admin will try to say, "Both of your parents were born here... but their parents were here illegally so none of your citizenship counts."

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I get it a lot with political questions.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago

So none of us will be able to prove that we're citizens. How convenient for the Ruling Party.

[–] ExtremeDullard 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Uh oh... Clarence Thomas just got a new luxury RV for free! Thanks Harlan!

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ExtremeDullard 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He can't. He has to vote for unconstitutional Trump shit to return the favors.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

So John Oliver wasn’t his only RV suitor?

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

More bad behavior from the Roberts Supreme Court. Write it down, Democrats.

I'm just going to keep putting "bad behavior / bad behaviour" in the thread of each new piece of SCOTUS' deliberate ignorance of democracy, constitution and the rule of law. You'll be able to search my profile for it, and maybe Democrats can do something about it if they can retake power.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How optimistic you are, to assume that the token opposition party will EVER have any power, ever again.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

It's also a very bold assumption of mine that they would try to do anything more than the status quo even if they did manage to retake power, predicated on the Democratic Party being massively reformed. If there was ever a time to reform the Dems, that's right now, years before midterms or a US general election.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

And that you know, they'll see this person profile in a niche social network.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago

No birthright citizenship in a country founded and inhabited almost entirely by immigrants, with no mandatory national ID? Yeah that's gonna be a shitshow and a half.