this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
240 points (96.9% liked)

GrapheneOS

640 readers
1 users here now

An unofficial discussion community for anyone interested in GrapheneOS.

Helpful links:

Official Graphene OS Discussion Forum

List of official Matrix channels and other contact sources.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mariusafa 2 points 3 days ago

There's also CalyxOS my guys

[–] BruceAlrighty@lemmy.nz 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a stripped-down and much more secure version of android, yes. Google is optional and sandboxed on GOS.

[–] FundMECFS@quokk.au 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s just sad I need to pay a couple hundred bucks for a google phone for the privilege of deegoogling…

Buy used, cheaper + no money tk google (directly at least)

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Android with actual privacy controls: camera blocking, mic blocking, storage space definitions, google play store NOT integrated directly into the phone. Control on USB port so connected devices can be 100% ignored. 5-7years of security updates. Etc.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

5-7years of security updates.

Now that is the real deal!

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's just the same support window that google provides for the pixels though

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is. And that's why its the best choice to run GrapheneOS, you get full 7 year support in a non Google OS. Other OSs exist but Graphene is on par with the major player

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My point being that they only provide a long support window because that's how long the manufacturer provides firmware and driver support for. They do offer a few extra updates for older unsupported devices but:

We provide extended support releases as a stopgap for users to transition to the far more secure current generation devices.

https://grapheneos.org/faq#device-support

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But lineageOS or /e/OS may not provide the 7 years for pixel. Because it is still effort to maintain an offshoot even if you have source code.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

problem is you absolutely need very specific hardware to use it.

i like graphene and the things it does, i just can't use it because the actual hardware seems to be expensive unobtanium outside of the us and europe.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're working on it though.

The thing is that, to achieve the level of privacy and security control they offer, it requires some specific hardware features. Features that, so far, only the Pixel line has offered.

[–] Turbonics 11 points 1 week ago

I would love to run Graphene if it didn't require buying a Google product

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago

I just don't want to give the shitasses at google money to avoid using another google product.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not to be a bummer, but GrapheneOS will forever by small and unrecognised as long as it is Pixel only.

I get their perspective, and I don't balme them, but an OS that only works on one lineup of phones that isn't even that popular in many countries, and needs to be sideloaded? It just inherently can't be very popular

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're working on that with an OEM. But right now, Pixels are the only ones meeting their security features requirements.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago

Once they move to hardware the isn't Google owned and is available in the eu I'll switch

[–] Turbonics 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did they say which OEM they are collaborating with? A first party GrapheneOS phone would be a huge deal

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Not disclosed yet. I assume the OEM and maybe also Graphene won't be comfortable disclosing that info until they get close to the release.

[–] lambalicious 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Canadians want an alternative to Android"

Graphene requires Google hardware

Dead in the water. LineageOS and others can be loaded to a whole bunch o'phones.

Graphene for some weird reason decided to grab the bull by the tail. First you need to have the hardware you want, then cones the software. The safest product out there is useless if it can not be used.

[–] gid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's not dead in the water though. After weighing up all my options, I decided buying a Pixel and immediately putting GrapheneOS on it was better for my privacy and security than getting another non-Google phone, and going through whatever processes required for whatever de-Googled Android ROM on that phone.

I don't like giving money to Google, but when I weighed up all the options this was still the best course for me. Of course, this is just my experience and reasoning.

Besides, it sounds like GrapheneOS is in talks with other OEMs so we may see support in other non-Google devices!

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

About damn time.

They should have fund raised to have their own custom phone made awhile ago. Not only would it ensure better stability for the long term future of the project, but would rely less on Google.

Of course, Google is still trying to stop all android custom ROM development so that's still an issue. But had they had their own phone made then Google would have to give them expanded access anyway.

Hope PostmarketOS can keep on developing well, because ideally we can get something more universal that's not dependant on Android in the first place past emulating apps.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Take a look at the security functions the Pixel platform hardware provides. It isn't optional.

[–] bollybing@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Does it work with banking apps?

[–] SatyrSack 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Are there killer features in banking apps that are not available via the bank's website? I understand that different people have different workflows, but for me, I tend to use websites over apps wherever possible.

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

I can't do mobile deposits on the website, which is a pretty important feature for me.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Some banks restrict many features behind a "trusted computing" requirement.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yes

And many other apps I use for streaming don't work at all.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Scotiabank works

[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It works for RBC in Canada.

[–] goatmeal@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

USA here, it works with both my national banks and local credit union apps. One of my credit card apps gives me a pop-up on every page that it won't work because there's no Google play services, but it actually just works anyway. Had to turn exploit compatibility mode off for a couple of them though

[–] domdanial@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

Seems to work with USAA, though I haven't tried depositing a check yet.

[–] pmk 5 points 1 week ago

I have a second hand pixel with graphene, but what we really need is something that isn't downstream of google. If enough people switched to graphene so that it actually hurt google, I'm sure they could do things to make life hard for alternative android based systems.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

GrapheneOS is Android though.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

**Conditions apply

[–] RacerX@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Why is this specific to Canadians. Wouldn't everyone want this?

I'm hoping to get my hands on a Harmony NextOS phone soon. I've seen some Huawei phones sporting it, but they were limited to their unaffordable, to me, high-end models. Until there is a working Linux phone, I'd rather give my data to the Chinese than to Google and 5-Eyes.