this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
34 points (67.7% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9920 readers
119 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this. If the reason is in the source but is tedious to find (e.g. in a lengthy video), you must add an explanation for where it is.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources (for a rough idea, check out this list), and posts should retain the title (if one exists) from works like news articles, videos, etc. You may (but need not) edit your post if the source changes the title. Other types of posts should have a title which accurately, relatively neutrally describes their contents.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal. Within moderator discretion, this doesn't just include reposts of the exact same media but also includes e.g. a secondary source telling basically the exact same story as another that was already posted.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

So don't be kind to people who need it because they could betray you later?

Sounds like Republican logic to me.

The reason to help people is because they need it, not because you need to get something from them.

These people have the right to upset and outraged that they were betrayed by a community that they supported.

But the logic being suggested here that they should have never offered helped because this was inevitable is not only cold and heartless but also xenophobic and discriminatory against Muslims.

You all sound like GOP voters.

Edit: Mocking people for showing compassion is a new low here. Your anger and hate is turning you into the people you deride. Take a long look in the mirror people.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nonsense. If your chosen belief system includes edicts to harm other people you can fuck right the fuck off with your false indignation. You're the asshole in the room, not everyone else.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Again, lumping all those practicing a religion into the same pot is discriminatory. It's at the very least stereotyping. If you know anything about religion and the people who practice it, you would know that there's a much variation from church to church or mosque to mosque as there are between major religions. I'm an atheist and even I know not every Christian church and Christian person believe or practice the same things, the same goes for Muslims.

This is how you make enemies of allies before you even give them a chance. If you want to alienate every single Muslim person without even giving them a chance the you're just as bad as Trump voters.

AND EVEN IF, it was safe to assume that they would vote against flying pride flags, the people who gave them help and compassion did nothing wrong. If you believe otherwise you're more of a villain that the Muslims who betrayed them.

If you think casting people out because they were raised to believe some shit in a book that was written thousands of years ago is going to making things better, you're the idiots here. Their children will remember the compassion, and maybe that will change them. Isolating them and treating them as unwanted would never make anything better.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because any of that had worked so far. You're scarily ignorant.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Again, turning inward and only taking care of your own team are exactly the attitudes of the people this place is meant to mock, and it's exactly why we are in the situation we're in.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Nah, I'm not going to stop pointing out hypocritical bullshit just because it conflicts with some weird idealistic worldview you've got.

[–] lamp@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No one is saying that they shouldn't have been shown compassion. They're saying that they shouldn't have been elected to office.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Where the fuck does it say they voted for them? You idiots are all laughing at someone for helping people and being betrayed.

Y'all went from laughing at conservatives hurt by conservatives to just laughing at people hurt by conservatives. What's next, the little kids with cancer being deported?

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

"Why am i getting blamed for the things the people i identify as are doing?!"

The books are immutable. The whole deal of kuran is that it's immutable and god smites people who try to change it.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

I think it's more a "you shouldn't expect people will change their whole belief system just because you helped them materially. Don't vote bigots into office, regardless of situation."

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So don’t be kind to people who need it because they could betray you later?

not sure where you're getting that interpretation from

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

The comments and fact that this is posted here means the people hurt should have assumed so.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, showing kindness isn't the mistake, expecting it in return ^(especially if common sense says otherwise)^ is.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

They're telling them how they feel and you're laughing at them.

I'll say it again. You all went from laughing at conservatives for being hurt by the people they elected to just laughing at people hurt by conservatives. Now you just sound like Trumpers for pointing at victims of laughing.

[–] threeonefour@piefed.ca 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Alan Turing invented computers and used them to crack Nazi encryption during WWII helping the Allies win the war. After the war ended, he was repayed by being jailed and chemically castrated for being gay. So, I guess things are improving?

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Since people here seem confused by this post:

Helping a minority religious group and defending them against discrimination? Good.

Beleiving that religious fundamentalists will suddenly have progressive values and not immediately turn against the LGBTQ people who stood by them? Naive.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Source on her believing this? Because all I see is justified outrage, yet you're calling her stupid.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Naive and stupid don't mean the same thing. Stupid means a lack of intelligence but naive is a lack of wisdom.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 1 points 9 months ago

The meme outright says stupid.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 7 points 9 months ago

Yes but it says they're "muslim" here, not a kind of radical or whatever. There is nothing here foreshadowing.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

It's stupid not to be bigoted in a world where other people are.

An argument only someone invested in bigotry would make.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 15 points 9 months ago

Stupid isn't a good word. Naive is better. You would think that after fighting to make a place more open that others would be appreciative, but unfortunately people don't work that way.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Fuck the religious.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 6 points 9 months ago

Image broken

[–] GR4CELESS@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

When I was growing up I (caucasian) for some reason had a couple cassette tapes of American First Nations folk tales. One has been looming in the back of my mind, mostly with regard to personal relationships, but it seems relevant in politics and so many other areas of life.

Paraphrased version in my natural tone goes something like this:

A young person is preparing to wade across a river when they notice a rattlesnake on the same bank. The snake seems to be giving an indication that it wishes to cross the river, so the child approaches the snake and asks if it wants a lift, because they were raised to treat all living beings with kindness. The snake looks over the child as if to say "you sure, human? I mean, that's nice and all, but I am a rattlesnake. Didn't you ever learn to leave us alone?"
The child persists, saying "well yes, I can see and hear that you are a rattlesnake, but I was raised to treat all beings with kindness, and this river is deep and fast. If you try cross it alone, you'll be swept away. But I have long legs and steady feet, and hands to carry you with, and I have eyes to see that you need help if you wish to cross the river. So I offer you this aid, which I can provide in this moment, and ask for no payment, only that you do not bite me as we cross."
The snake pauses, looks the kid over again, then relaxes its coils and stills its rattle. The child picks up the snake, and begins to wade across the river. As they cross, the child speaks to the snake, saying "remember this kindness, snake. The next time you or your children see a human, remember that we helped you cross this river, and let us pass in peace. We don't eat rattlesnakes, and rattlesnakes don't eat humans, we need not engage in conflict in the future."
The snake remains quiet and still until the child finishes crossing the river, at which point the snake rears back, tenses, and strikes the child in the throat. The child instantly collapses, the snake's venom coursing through their veins, swiftly poisoning their heart and brains. With their dying breath, the child turns tear-filled eyes to the snake as if to ask "why? Why would you kill me after I helped you cross the river? Why, after an expression of kindness and an offer of assistance, with no expectation of payment beyond decency in return, would you betray my trust?"
The snake replies, "because I'm a fucking rattlesnake you naive twit, what did you think was going to happen?" The snake leaves and the child dies.

Remember, snakes are snakes, and humans are humans, which makes it all the more disappointing when humans act like snakes (and also when snakes don't act like humans)

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I've also heard a version of that story where the snake bites the kid in the middle of the crossing, and they both drown

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There's a similar tale with a scorpion and frog, often attributed to Aesop, that ends with them both drowning.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 2 points 9 months ago

You know that was probably the version I heard actually

[–] GR4CELESS@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

There was a nagging feeling in my memory that this was the actual ending, or that the snake bit the kid and then easily swam back across the river