Slop.

817 readers

527 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

VILenin@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Hestia@hexbear.net

oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net

Diva@lemmy.ml

Diva@hexbear.net

mathemachristian@hexbear.net

Channel 5 News interviews NATO lib who was debating Charlie Kirk at the moment of impact (www.youtube.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Jabril@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Authoritarian c/video mods censored my freeze peach for posting this there so I'm moving it here to the freeze peach zone

Andrew and his guest frame him as representing "the left." He goes off on the "wannabe activists" who are making light of Charlie's death, he is a father of 2 after all. Andrew says that anyone who can watch the video and think what happened is okay is displaying "antisocial, psychotic, sociopathic disorder."

The interview is set presumably in NATO lib's house, where he has on display a series of flags, lit up with fairy lights: Black Lives Matter, NATO, US Flag, Pride Rainbow, Ukraine Flag, and one flag which is blocked by a plant but seems to be the anti-communist three arrows symbol.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 18 points 6 months ago

Andrew says that anyone who can watch the video and think what happened is okay is displaying "antisocial, psychotic, sociopathic disorder."

Sexual predator says words.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tbh I thought the interview was pretty good, until the guy started going off about "left activists".

I get it, this guy saw a man get murdered right in front of him, and he seems to be a "friendly debate solves everything" lib. So like, I wanna be somewhat sympathetic.

But really? No pushback on that? Especially when, at this point, know one knew who the shooter was.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago

Yeah Andrew is a "good interviewer," he went to journalism school and takes it pretty seriously. Shame that he did the whole "got caught being a sex pest and shifted politically to the right since they don't care about that" thing. He could have at least been a Hasan type gateway for libs but instead he is a sheep dog to lead libs back to the right

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago

I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: