this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
94 points (95.2% liked)

UK Politics

4514 readers
67 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Labour Party delegates will decide on Monday whether to adopt an emergency motion declaring that 'Israel' is committing genocide in Gaza and calling for a full arms embargo. The vote will take place during the party’s annual conference in Liverpool.

Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer opposed the motion on Sunday, warning that it could undermine aspects of the Middle East peace process. The motion, titled “Peace in the Middle East 2”, will be considered alongside another proposal broadly supporting existing Labour policy on 'Israel'.

If passed, the motion would signal Labour’s official acceptance of a UN Commission of Inquiry report that found 'Israel' guilty of committing genocide in Gaza. It would also back comprehensive sanctions on 'Israel' and a full arms embargo. Delegates from constituencies and affiliated organisations will vote on multiple motions over the next few days.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FarrellPerks@feddit.uk 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Starmer and his team unfortunately have a history of completely ignoring anything that comes out of conference.

The annual conference has voted for voting reforms a number of times now for example but the leadership just ignores them.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And it's going to fuck them over come the next election.

[–] meejle@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

And not just them, but the entire country! ✨

[–] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

anglo Labour parties are everything they pretend communist orgs are

iirc state branches of the AusLP passed pro Palestine motions the last couple of years that werent adopted, they also kicked people out of the party who didn't toe their pro zionist line

Fatima Payman was an ex united workers union organiser, the union threatened organisers who supported her after she was removed from the ALP, and I just found out today a member of their national executive is israeli and even lived and worked in israel fairly recently

these same people are on the board of my superannuation fund who o finally got to admit do invest in israel, because it wouldn't be a good financial decision not to

it's going to be such a pain on my arse shutting that account down and getting the money to another, less shit fund (super funds are mandatory here, I'm investigating self management, but it looks like a lot more work, what i can find online suggests people only do this to invest in real estate, haha yes)

fuck you host plus

This has been suggested to me recently but i havent checked it properly https://www.australianethical.com.au/

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

One day, when it’s safe, when there’s no personal downside to calling a thing what it is, when it’s too late to hold anyone accountable, everyone will have always been against this.

— Omar El Akkad

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And Keir will ignore it. JC respected democratic motions, Keir doesn't give 2 shits.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

His General Secretary appointment has been deeming many Palestine motions out of order, for years.

Even if you're favourable to Keir, he's not a democrat and had largely ignore conference motions and tried to block ones he does not like.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why would he ignore it?

He already banned weapons exports to Israel, condemned Israel for war crimes, ramped up aid to Palestine, sanctioned a bunch of Israeli MPs, committed to arresting Netanyahu if he ever comes to the UK, refused to join the US/Israel coalition in Iran, and recognised Palestine.

Why would he suddenly become pro-Israel?

[–] hector@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

All meaningless things for show, israel could start gassing gazans and he would do nothing more than performative acts like he has already done.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Why is banning weapons exports and recognising Palestinian statehood meaningless? That sounds important to me.

What is an example of something that would be meaningful? If banning exports is not meaningful it sounds like nothing will satisfy you short of invading Israel.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I remember when banning weapons exports to Israel was being described as the most important thing the UK could do. Now we've done it and it's been relegated to 'meaningless'. And if recognising Palestine statehood is meaningless, why have Palestinians been campaigning for just that for decades? Clearly they don't see it as meaningless!

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The UK has not recognized Palestinian statehood except on paper. It blackmails the PA into caving to Israeli demands in exchange for recognizing no clear territories.

Also the UK still supplies weapons to Israel. Which is mentioned in the article.

This explains how fraudulent it all is https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/recognition-palestine-repeat-wests-oslo-peace-fraud

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Christ.

I lost all the positive things that's been done and you — completely baselessly — say "oh well it doesn't count because it must be for show".

You aren't thinking rationally.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I remember having a conversation with someone here, back before the GE, where I said that it wouldn't really matter how much Starmer shifted to a pro-Palestinian position, people would never think it was enough and in fact wouldn't even acknowledge that it had happened. Other person was swearing blind that I was wrong. And, I mean, not to gloat or anything, but...

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

He has done nothing of substance. Your misundetstanding here is based on thinking that anything he did was for more than show.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"nothing of substance" says the commenter

  • banned weapons exports to Israel
  • condemned Israel for war crimes
  • ramped up aid to Palestine
  • sanctioned a bunch of Israeli MPs
  • committed to arresting Netanyahu if he ever comes to the UK
  • refused to join the US/Israel coalition in Iran
  • recognised Palestine

says reality.

It really is worrying. Both on the far right and the far left, vibes matter, not truth. I used to dismiss it, but the horseshoe theory is real.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

A lot of your list is factually incorrect. This, along with other recent factually challenged comments made by this account makes it necessary for you to source every single claim on that list to make it more credible than my next sentence.

I call bullshit on all of it.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Why is Israel in quote marks throughout? Seems to come from the source, so I'm not blaming you, OP, but it strikes me as a bit off.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

It's a Jordanian news site. Jordan does not recognize Israel as a country. Which is based.

[–] NecroticEuphoria@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

'Israel' is in quotes because OP doesn't recognize the entity.