this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23705 readers
369 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

:up-yours-woke-moralists:

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DoubleShot@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Honestly Star Trek TOS is pretty much like this, too.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

You're completely right but also I love Bones so what am I supposed to do.

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

Pausing the plot of your mid-century sci-fi space exploration novel so that you can insert a screed about the moral goodness of beating your wife.

[–] President_Obama@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

these are boy androids

:crush: can I make the robots a sandwich?

[–] ElGosso@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Here's the comic on the SMBC website if you want to see the red button panel https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/golden-age

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

In a proper Heinlein novel, she should be excited about it, and possibly naked

:data-laughing:

[–] mittens@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

we would, but we accidentally asked one of the robots to "go be a useless piece of shit somewhere else" and the robot took it literally but due to the way we setup the asimov rules, this robot has convinced others that they should be useless pieces of shit as well since this was a direct command so now you need to figure out through sheer logic and tenuous characterization which robot is the quirky one before you can ask one of them to fix dinner since they won't do anything otherwise

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

Asimov are still great Torment Nexus books for understanding what "Computers do exactly what you tell them, whether you know what you're telling them or not" and "Just because a computer is smart doesn't mean it will think like you". I'm sure there are lots since then, but Asimov's three set up a simple framework for exploring the question of "How could we totally fuck up programming a robot in fun and frightening ways?"

[–] RamrodBaguette@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

Curious if the Soviet side of SF (eg Aelita) was much better in regards to this. Cultural conservatism is hard to shake in just decades.

[–] MarieFontenot@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Strugatsky brothers are one the the best-known Soviet SF writers, and one of the biggest critiques about their works was always "there's almost no women in your books". To which their honest reply was "We don't know how to write women". No actual misogyny, though. Just no important female characters.

Still, very good books. I've just finished the Noon cycle - a series about an utopian future where Communism won. Highly recommend it.

[–] BringMeExtra@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

To which their honest reply was “We don’t know how to write women”. No actual misogyny, though. Just no important female characters

lmao honestly I respect that. Ideally they’d, you know, learn how to do that, but at least they didn’t bullshit.