this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
324 points (98.5% liked)

news

496 readers
969 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 121 points 2 months ago (1 children)

what do you mean some random podcaster with zero experience cant run one of the worlds largest law enforcement agencies?

whats next, a business man becoming president and trying to run the government like a business is also a terrible idea?!

/s

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 81 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

A fake TV businessman who made his money from daddy and money laundering for the Russian mob, who's also a pedophile rapist and 34-times convicted felon? Of course such a person couldn't do the job of POTUS. The very idea is absurd.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Who is total mental decline as well https://youtu.be/9OtO-cypKmY

[–] Zier@fedia.io 53 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The head of the FBI, or any other Federal intelligence agency, should NEVER be an appointed position. Only qualified candidates should be hired to run these agencies. Politics needs to be reigned in so the trashing of the country can't occur. 249 years and this has never been fixed. What a bloody joke.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I get you, but I can also see it being both?

THEORY an appointed position but part of the confirmation is actually verifying their credentials

[–] ArachnidMania@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago

Isn't that was the senate approval is supposed to be?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's the difference between appointing somebody and hiring somebody? Isn't it virtually the same thing?

[–] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The president chose who he wanted & it was rubber stamp approved. Having an individual work their way up in the Agency to finally be promoted to the head is different, and they don't change every 4 years. Whiskey Pete was a fox newz reader, un-qualified for this job.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No that wasn't my question. I understand the difference between a qualified and unqualified candidate. What am I asking is what's the difference between hiring and appointing? Who's doing the promoting? And how is that any different than being appointed?

[–] Zier@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Congress has to approve the appointed cabinet. The FBI promotes employees. The FBI has no choice in the person running their entire organization, they were never an employee there.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yes. Well aware. But the question I asked? You said the head of the FBI should never be appointed and we should only hire qualified individuals. Then I asked what's the difference between an appointment and a hiring, also who does the hiring? Remember?

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He doesn't just look like he's incapable, he really is!

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey the look of terror is just his natural resting dumb face.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know what you mean. The man exudes confidence and competence.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I can’t tell if that last one is an animated gif or not.

[–] beetus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

The eyes follow me 🧐

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

OH SHIT! Oh. I thought it was gonna jump out at me.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 months ago

“Come on Kash, let’s take a picture to show them you’re doing a great job!’” Leavitt wrote, attaching a photo of the pair smiling and giving a thumbs up.

The fact that they think a photo of them smiling shows they're doing a great job, tells you everything you need to know about their competence.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought his job was to use the FBI to harass political opponents, gather blackmail info for sale to donors, destroy evidence of regime corruption, sell out cooperating witnesses to criminal orgs, and fake evidence for clout. Also waste resources on unofficial activities on the side.

[–] UnspecificGravity@infosec.pub 14 points 2 months ago

I mean, that's all in the wheelhouse of normal FBI operations under any administration, but it seems that this dude is especially bad at managing this regardless of their willingness to be tools or corruption.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

The Dunning-Kruger administration.

[–] crumpted@sopuli.xyz 26 points 2 months ago

If we're going to have Trump toadies anyways, I prefer the incompetent ones.

Point is, I'm a big fan of Kash Money.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

US has never been this vulnerable to a terror attack. good luck.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Who needs to when it's eating itself from the inside?

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

"Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake"

[–] cashsky@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Someone should make a version of that Charlie Kirk site where you use a slider to change his head size.

But with Kash’s eyes.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

this has been known for a year

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

You mean that the wee little penguin-stance man with the face of a haunted doll and the personality of a Furby owned by a drunk middle schooler wasn't the best choice?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

So, all going to plan, then.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago

I feel like I'm doing this to often but:

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

On the plus side, there’s never been a better time for Americans to start a career in organised crime.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Well apparently they put criminals in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue these days so...

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Um no, the ship is being ruddered just right by his totally-organic and authentic girlfriend.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago