What about work requirements? Drug testing? Can they use the money on soda and fast food?
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
128 points (98.5% liked)
politics
28932 readers
2765 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I frankly don't want my tax dollars going to "those people." Everybody knows they're just going to use it on Busch light and cigarettes.
Yeah, I'm guessing we will never see any Faux segments on how that one farmer saved up some of his handout and {shock, horror!} used it to {clutches pearls} buy steak. And {collapses on fainting couch} LOBSTER!
It is so weird to me how the people that supposedly loooove the "free market" lose their minds the minute they see someone select their own food when given food benefits? The same people that fall all over themselves worshipping utter slime like Donvict just because he happens to be wealthy and think he should never have to face any consequences want to police the nutritional intake of the very poorest people...
Meth would probably be less popular in rural communities if we stopped farmer subsidies. There's no data to show that, but let's assume and do it anyways just to make sure. Can't waste those tax dollars on drugs that don't make corporations money!
It's because they believe that money is a reflection of how good you are as a person. So if someone needs food benefits, then they are a shitty person, and should be punished for it.
Welfare queens.
True MAGA farmers should reject payouts from the government, because that's socialism and socialism is BaAaAaD
Lol yeah right. Ayn fucking Rand didn't even walk the walk when it came down to it.
They should all go to Galt's Gulch.
Vast majority of this funding will get vacuumed up by corporate farms and continue to leave most small family/independents out to dry
load more comments
(8 replies)
How about them bootstraps, huh?
"What we're doing is we're taking a relatively small portion of that [money we made off tariffs], and we're going to be giving and providing it to the farmers in economic assistance.“
You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the New West. You know... morons.
Howard Johnson is right!
Doctor Samuel Johnson is right about Orson Johnson being right.
Yet another "one-time" payment to farmers... must be another year with trump in the white house: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/14/donald-trump-coronavirus-farmer-bailouts-359932
Ok. So then what about next year when the tarrifs are still in place and fucking over farmers?
They will get another "one time" payment again. It's like stimulus checks but only for his supporters.
Well, hopefully that's after the midterms and if they don't like it, well fuck it. Donvict won't care as long as he has a compliant Congress to kowtow to every bullshit decree he bleats out on his Xitter knockoff.
So, he's taking our money that we're forced to pay due to his stupid tariffs and is using some of it to payoff his supporters who he screwed over with those same tariffs. So, forcing everyone else to clean up his messes. Classic trump.
Sounds like OpenAI and Nvidia's circular investments.
Or like the arsonist that is also a firefighter.
The human centipede of corruption
Why do they need payouts?
Seeing this after reading about our military spending approaching one trillion $... It's a pittance. About 2% of the military budget. And as someone else said, most will be gobbled by corps. What a joke.
How much of that £12 bn is going to megacorporations versus small farmers?
The small farmers are drowning in debt so that money will mostly go to the mega corps anyway. Shits fucked.
It's like driving through town and throwing coins out the window.
From his own pocket right? Because his stupid decisions put them in that situation. I would like to see what percentage of money goes to small farms and what money goes to huge corporate farms.
boosting the farm safety net
Oh nice that they get one but no one fucking else does.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I’m trying to figure out here how much farmland is actually owned by farming families and not corporate entities or corporations operating under the “family” banner while being owned by a family that owns shitloads of farms, but I can’t find an honest answer here and the definition of family seems fucking dubious everywhere I’ve looked.
Most American Farmers are millionaires. They also voted for Trump.
Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives
load more comments
(1 replies)
Once the small farmers realize Trump is coming for their land it will be too late.
I mean, it's too late now, but they're going to keep gargling his balls right up until they're thrown out on their asses.
So the argument is that since the executive is collecting the tariffs, it can spend them directly without Congress?
Isn't the IRS also an executive agency?
Last time I checked they aren't making any arguments unless they are sued.
Why Trump thinks he can spend any revenue without congressional permission is beyond me. It is clear his administration does not care for the rule of law. They are a criminal organization.
Look it's me, a farmer.
view more: next ›