this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
876 points (99.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

14696 readers
234 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] potatoguy@lemmy.eco.br 104 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

On Elon Musk, it's funny because he never put a profit, like tesla isn't the biggest, X is draining money, his robotics shits are just that: shit, only spacex is relatively successfull, but it's not on the same level of half trillion dollars.

There isn't much that he's done, all of his companies are making less profits (or losing more money if i'm being correct), he is just a jake paul that fakes being a fake intelligent person.

Edit: Deleted my edit, i'm drunk

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, its ironic. The richest man in the world doesn't have a single* truly profit-making venture under him.

How the bubble around him hasn't burst yet I don't know, but it would certainly be a feast for sore eyes.

*Edit: Forgot about SpaceX, which actually has made itself a decent chunk of money - about $15.5 billion in 2025 - but I doubt that alone is capable of propping up his nearly $500 billion personal valuation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

SpaceX has been phenomenally successful. I don't think he can be attributed to much of that success. The Falcon 9 handled 95% of launches in 2024. SpaceX has went from non existant to a near monopoly in 23 years while competing against some of the most powerfully connected companies in the world.

I'm not a SpaceX fanboy (I'm a space fanboy). They have done a lot of good for the space industry, while also causing a lot of harm to the scientific space community (earth based observations). I just don't think you can make an argument that SpaceX is not a successful company.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bottleofchips@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Go home drunk, I’m too Dad

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Apartheid-man's basically a bubble unto himself.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 77 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Three bullets could do so much for this country

[–] TheFermentalist@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

And they are so cheap!

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 72 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The weird thing is that these people don't think they're rich enough and want to extract more money from government and the people, and they simultaneously think that the government gives too much money to poor people.

[–] DirtPuddleMisfortune@feddit.org 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They race to who will be the first trillionaire. It's disgusting. Meanwhile children are starving.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FateOfTheCrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 weeks ago

To these people, there's no such thing as "enough". Contentment is not a concept that exists within their minds, only a sociopathic urge to acquire more.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The french really did have a solid way of reminding the upper crust that they were vastly outnumbered by the people they were standing upon...

Remind me. Why are the worlds billionaires all building bunkers? A true mystery.

[–] leavemealone@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Honestly stop being poor dudes, just ask your father for some millions to get started and start exploiting people, easy

[–] TheFermentalist@reddthat.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

Just a small multi million dollar loan, Dad

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 33 points 2 weeks ago

Any place that allows this to happen is a bad place.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

Eat the rich.

[–] erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago

People really should pay their bottoms more.

(sorry)

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

We already have Musk acting like his own personal country, making personal deals with world leaders that benefit only himself over other nations. Others are probably doing it, too, but we haven't heard about it.

Now these Sociopathic Oligarchs are heading to trillionaire status, and they WILL be founding their own Corporo-Nations, which will require private armies for security. Eventually, these Corporo-Nations will combine to form their own alliance, combine their armies, and start throwing their weight around militarily, as well as economically.

This is all just a matter of time, and then we're going to wonder as a planet, Why we didn't stop those guys back when we had a chance?

I have no doubt at all that ALL of them have violated many laws, in many sectors, to get as rich as they are. Investigate them deeply, prosecute them for their crimes, and confiscate their entire fortunes. If we don't do that, it is absolutely certain that we will come to regret it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] huppakee@piefed.social 20 points 1 week ago

Damn, when I read this statistic the other day I took it as 'the bottom half has less then the 3 richest persons', but in fact, it is 'three people each have more than the bottom half' holy shit.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago

As per, the only thing that trickles down is shit, vomit and piss.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't forget that shithead larry Ellison. He's worth 200b right now.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's hard to believe, but Ellison is worse than Musk. Musk is a lot like Trump, he wants love and respect, even though they are far too psychopathic to really understand what those things are, and they think that having money and acting tough will make people love and respect them.

Ellison doesn't seem to care about that. He's a mean, cruel person, who seems to enjoy being that way, and like Fred Trump, he raised his son to be as much a psychopath as he is.

Musk is dangerous, but he is too stupid and impulsive, and it blunts his impact. Ellison is far smarter, and far more effective. He's not quite as rich as the rest, but at a certain level, who can really tell? It's all just wretched excess after about $100 bill anyway. But even so, now that he owns CBS and Paramount, and is trying a poison pill takeover of Warner Discovery, he'll be in the upper reaches very soon, jockeying for position at in the top rankings

And I doubt he will stop at CBS/ Paramount and Warner. Larry Ellison is going to control a massive amount of the media in the this country, and he is a massive MAGA, of the worst kind. There are supposed to be government controlled limits on media ownership, but all rules are elastic under MAGA, and he'll be allowed to own anything he wants. Don't be surprised if he ends up owning all broadcast TV, and then he controls the narrative for all political campaigns, election results, news programs, debates, etc. No candidate gets promoted on TV unless MAGA allows it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Every time I see these guys’ faces I cringe so hard. It’s frankly embarrassing working in the tech industry when most people think of them whenever anyone mentions it.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

USA at again, isn't it? The country with trillion debt, that's about to blow.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It has always been a thing with America. The debt has been astronomical for many decades. I know its easy to believe its something new, but it really isnt. My entire life, America has been like this.

Im not too interested in the why, but I have glanced articles explaining why this is actually ok because of their position in the world, the world currency being the dollar, and other factors. Its very boring for me but you can find info about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Top two are richer than the 3rd + the 50%

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CtrlAltDefeat@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Now, I might be misreading this data, but from what it looks like either one of these billionaires by themselves have more wealth than the bottom 50% of Americans, right?

More like one Billionaire own 5.6 times the wealth of the bottom 50%

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this is phrased like those three just slightly edge out the bottom 50, as opposed to each individually owning significantly greater than the bottom 50. I'm going to assume these three own more than the "bottom" like 85%.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It works like a piñata - if we beat it open with a club, only then will its contents trickle down.

[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

"own more" is putting it lightly, they literally own 10 times more than bottom 170 mil people combined

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It will trickle down any second now

No, no. A little while yet.

They've got to get enough to cover

https://www.usdebtclock.org/

first. THEN it'll trickle down. For super super sure.

Trust them. Maybe they care.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gezginorman@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago

money is a meaningless construct. Eat the rich.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago

He builds fireworks that's pretty American tbh.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What’s about the other twelve multi-billionaires that are worth more than $85B? Why were they left out?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Dragonslayer is an occupation that needs a comeback

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

there are way more of us than there are of them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The only way it trickles down is the way Charlie Kirk showed us

[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Vote out every single Republican or whatever right-wing/far-right party you have in your country. Shift the Overton window each time a seat gets flipped.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Roughly speaking, if you murdered and seized their wealth by liquidating their assets at current value, that's like... 6k donation to half of the US.

That's assuming 50% of about 340m people with big economic assumptions that won't hold up, but fun to think about. It's not a ton of money even then, but it'd probably do more for everyone than under some dragon. Course, we could also just tax them a large amount like we used to, which accomplishes the same thing without the murder.

load more comments
view more: next ›