this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
265 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28854 readers
2268 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Legal experts have raised concerns US forces may have committed a war crime by killing survivors of initial strike

The Pentagon will not make public the full video of a September attack in the Caribbean that killed two individuals as they were clinging to the wreckage of a burning boat, Pete Hegseth said on Tuesday.

The strike has been the most controversial development in Donald Trump’s campaign against Venezuela, which has seen US forces blow up vessels alleged to be transporting narcotics from the South American country to the United States, seize an oil tanker and threaten further military action against the president, Nicolás Maduro.

Legal experts have raised concerns that US forces may have committed a war crime by killing the survivors of an initial air strike on 2 September, and that the campaign is illegal. Democrats have called for the release of video detailing that attack, and Trump at one point supported making the footage public but later backtracked and deferred to Hegseth.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] socsa@piefed.social 69 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So it's even worse than we assume?

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

From what I heard [a Democratic representative say] the two victims were holding on to wreckage, barely staying afloat, for an hour before they were killed.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep, kinda goes against the "they were going for weapons bullshit" and that's ignoring that drones tend to operate far far outside small arms range. There's also very little evidence that a navy asset was anywhere in the area to be fired at.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

And to add that people shooting at a drone is not any kind of true danger to human life and so obliterating them from the skies is kinda ridiculous.

[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

probably no Fog of war, just smoke from burning corpses

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 58 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why? We paid for those murders, hand over the goods so we can assess what we got for the money.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The death of multiple evil drug kingpins with several tonnes of fentanyl headed for Miami. Trust me bro.

Source: I said trust me bro.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Bro... trust me

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Government produced snuff films.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Some real Oryx and Crake shit

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A LEGALLY JUSTIFIABLE DOUBLE TAP STRIKE

ON SHIPWRECKED ENEMY COMBATANTS

IN INTERNATIONAL WATERS

ALL RECORDED ON VIDEO SO WE CAN CORROBORATE THE STORY YOU'RE TELLING US?

Yes.

May I see it?

.....no.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

SEYMOUR, THE VIDEO IS OF A WARCRIME!

No, mother. That's just the northern strikes.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

They are getting tired of supplying all the evidence needed for their trial.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It'll be shown at your tribunal you criminal fuck.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

But, if you've got nothing to hide...

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I mean if I committed a war crime, I would not willingly post the video on YouTube.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What's the penalty for murder?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 2 months ago

It's a war crime so Nobel Peace Prize.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

If I were him I wouldn't be concerned about the murder, I would be concerned about the violations of the Geneva convention.