this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
110 points (100.0% liked)

news

24505 readers
440 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.

If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.

Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.

Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.

Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.

Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't think of a good name for it.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] bananon@hexbear.net 63 points 1 week ago

:manufactured-consent: kelly

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 42 points 1 week ago

Never have heroes, bros. (Of course, most of us have moved on from Chomsky and Orw*ll after the baby leftist stage.)

[–] dead@hexbear.net 40 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The photos are numbered out a of a package of 95000 photos.

The 2 Chomsky photos are numbered 65656 and 65659, indicating that there are 2 Chomsky photos in between.

The 2 Bill Gates photos are numbered 50603 and 71978, indicating that the photos are separate or unrelated to each other.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

or there's 21376 photos of bill

[–] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago

Yep, Bill is even wearing different glasses in these pics indicating they are from different time periods. It's just wild that his divorce is the MOST EXPENSIVE IN HISTORY, with Melinda receiving $76 billion. And all because Billy couldn't resist Epstein's island.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago

The 2 Bill Gates photos are numbered 50603 and 71978, indicating that the photos are separate or unrelated to each other.

Or there are 20000+ Gates photos and he's actually hiding under Chomsky's shirt in these ones.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would not be surprised if it's sanitized to just implicate high rolling dems and leaves out the wet boy.

[–] Lowleekun@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

You think? As a euroremoved it is really interesting to see how easily people get swooped up in this story of this dead mossad asset.

Your problem seems not to be the bad state your country is in but some kind of celebrity bullshit, so I guess nothing new. For all I care your crooked politicians could haveremovedd children every day. What difference does it make on top of all the children they bombed and all the widows they create. And that's shit their constituents cheer on...

It is all show but we are sadly not better here, we just lack entertaining pervs right now I guess.

[–] StarkWolf@hexbear.net 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I was looking through the released pictures, and for some reason I am very curious who this person was, who seems to be trying quite hard to obscure their identity:

Also curious about the Gates pictures...like what the context is, where these were taken (doesn't look like Jeffrey's Island), who he is with, or who took the pictures. I know his name showed up in relation to Epstein in his logbook or whatever, so he was obviously involved with Epstein in some way, and these photos ended up in Epstein's estate, but I just don't really know what to make of them. Are these photos of him more incriminating than I am realizing? The Chomsky ones are much more damning. (I don't mean to defend Bill Gates, I hate him and wish these pictures showed him directly with Epstein, or on the jet or island or with a clearly underage girl)

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Super_Lumalo@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

I'm so glad I wasn't the only one to think that peltier-laugh

[–] Biddles@hexbear.net 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] StarkWolf@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

This is the answer, thank you.

[–] CredibleBattery@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

oh my god, that's CEO Rachel Jake

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Recently - in the past few months - has Chomsky said a word about his ties to Epstein? I assume the answer is no but it's impossible to google because the results are just news articles about the two of them.

[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 43 points 1 week ago

He hasn’t been able to speak for months, maybe over a year. But when he WAS asked about his Epstein ties a while back he got VERY defensive

[–] LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's suffered a massive stroke that left him bedbound unable to speak circa summer 2023.

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which is pretty convenient for dens/mainstream media to start a smear canpaign against him but we all know they wouldnt do that

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

His connection to Epstein has been known since a long while before his stroke. He was asked about it numerous times and just deflected away from the question.

Epstein arranged several meetings in 2015 and 2016 with Mr. Chomsky, while he was a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. When asked about his relationship with Epstein, Mr. Chomsky replied in an email: “First response is that it is none of your business. Or anyone’s. Second is that I knew him and we met occasionally.” In March 2015, Epstein scheduled a gathering with Mr. Chomsky and Harvard University professor Martin Nowak and other academics, according to the documents. Mr. Chomsky said they had several meetings at Mr. Nowak’s research institute to discuss neuroscience and other topics. Two months later, Epstein planned to fly with Mr. Chomsky and his wife to have dinner with them and movie director Woody Allen and his wife, Soon-Yi Previn, the documents show. “If there was a flight, which I doubt, it would have been from Boston to New York, 30 minutes,” Mr. Chomsky said. “I’m unaware of the principle that requires that I inform you about an evening spent with a great artist.” Epstein donated at least $850,000 to MIT between 2002 and 2017, and more than $9.1 million to Harvard from 1998 to 2008, the schools have said. In 2021, Harvard said it was sanctioning Mr. Nowak for violating university policies in his dealings with Epstein, and was shutting a research center he ran that Epstein had funded. MIT said it was inappropriate to accept Epstein’s gifts, and that it later donated $850,000 to nonprofits supporting survivors of sexual abuse. In a 2020 interview with the “dunc tank” podcast, Mr. Chomsky said that people he considered worse than Epstein had donated to MIT. He didn’t mention any of his meetings with Epstein.

From WSJ

Keep in mind this is after Epstein was already known as a sex trafficker, the non-prosecution agreement was in 2008.

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“First response is that it is none of your business. Or anyone’s. Second is that I knew him and we met occasionally.”

"Third response is that I made frequent visits to Jeffery's pedo island"

[–] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

afaik he's losing/lost his voice ?

[–] demerit@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Isnt he like over a 100?

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not included here are the pics of Lolita quotes written on women's feet in black pen.

Or Epstein's collection of compound bows, which he had, for... reasons?

[–] dead@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You can see those photos if you click on the dropbox link on the article. There's 70 photos on the dropbox link in the article, as I mentioned in the title.

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

I no good at the internet.

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

Noam kinda looks a bit like Pepe Mujica or Antonio Gutierrez, or Andres Manuel Luis Obrador. But also not really.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

So if he truly was a honeypot operator for the mossad… is that whole place staffed with Lavrenty Berias?

[–] Krem@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not actually him right? I haven't seen him in a while is that what he looks like now?

[–] Wisp@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don’t think that’s Zach Braff, but I wouldn’t exactly be shocked