I bet they can't get any contractor to work on that, because the Administration has already stiffed the demolition crew and nobody wants to touch a job they will never get paid for.
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
654 points (98.5% liked)
politics
26808 readers
2441 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You need to remember just how stupid some of his base is. There are pickme's out there who will 100% jump at the chance and think surely Trump won't stiff them.
I'm actually amazed how he keeps finding new suckers after decades of doing it in the private sector and almost 10 years of doing it as President. The only ones that really came out ahead are the criminals that bought their pardons. Everyone else gets screwed one way or another.
Same here. Even back in 2010 and 2011 when I first started to look him up I was surprised that anyone could have trusted him or taken him seriously once the 90s rolled around. He should have been remembered as that conman from the 80s who is barely hanging onto life financially today.
He was always that shadey “businessman”, but that stupid reality show really put him back in the spotlight.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
The average American is very dumb. He has a large lot of rubes to stiff.
And half are even dumber than the average (assuming assumed assumptions).
load more comments
(5 replies)
The secret service still has to let them in though. That might narrow the field quite a bit. At least if the secret service hasn’t been gutted and filled with lackeys that is.
On a personal level sure, but this isn't a job for a random one man operation.
At the top level you need a business and as much as business leaders love Trump (who doesn't love a useful idiot) they would never risk their bottom line for it.
All that and the fact that you would likely need a whole bunch of credentials to be building parts of the white house, or at least you likely used to.
Actually on second thought I'm an idiot.
If he actually builds that stupid ballroom he would have to pay for it. Much easier to just take the donations and leave a hole in the ground.
How could I not see such an obvious grift.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I bet they can't get any contractor to work on that, because the Administration has already stiffed the demolition crew
I wanted this to be true... https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-east-wing-demolition-congress/?collection=471833 Unfortunately it's not
Wow, when did snopes become an absolutely adfucked shithole. Besides, as far as I can tell that article is focused on Congress stopping the payments being false, not whether or not they've actually been paid, which wasn't clear to me.
I wonder what a demolition crew does if you don't pay them. Other tradies will typically just rip out their work, but it's not like a demo crew can easily rebuild something they tore down.
Maybe that's Trump's big plan: don't pay the demolition crew, and hope that they build a massive ballroom in protest.
LMAO
A demo crew could keep working by mistake.
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
That asshole hasnt paid any bills in decades, i cant believe anyone is still dumb enough to accept a job for this conman.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Also, you try finding a construction crew on the east coast he hasn't personally stiffed already
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
They are very good at breaking things, but they don’t know how to create anything of value.
Typical fascists. It's all grandiose and talk. If one reads the history of Nazi and fascist policies, they tend to wing it. Fascism is a reaction and antithesis to rationalism. In that sense, why would they have a plan at all? Okay, maybe with Heritage Foundation, they have a plan, but overall it is about regression which ultimately doesn't make sense apart from being an emotional reaction to caring about lgbt, migrants and social welfare.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The fact that Trump just randomly tore down part of the White House still makes me laugh.
Wait until you see the shit stains on the constitution.
True patriot.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That's because he isn't building a ballroom.
This reads as way too competent a plan and scheme for Trump's admin.
I can't decide which is scarier, that Trump's admin is so incompetent they can't build a ballroom, or competent enough to plan and build a project like this while hiding it from the public
Too competent for Trump, absolutely. But there are some pretty scary competent people behind him, whispering in his ear. As the video details, the people he's hired to work on his "ballroom", also happen to be some of the world's leading experts on building super secure, military grade data centers. There's not a lot of overlap between those things, so it's hard to imagine that it's just a random coincidence.
Project 2025 is 50% executed. There are some competent people pulling Trumps strings.
LOL.
If you wanted a secret underground-anything why would you put it under the freakin whitehouse?
... and of all things a data centre, which would work the same if it were under sydney harbour, or you know... not underground at all, or well... just any of hundreds of existing data centres.
The article does give a reason, it says it's to allow "executive oversight." As if Trump is going to waddle on down there and work on the servers himself.
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
AKA "A place to hide after suspending midterms after society revolts when SCOTUS modifies the 14th amendment this summer"
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(13 replies)
Did he "forget" to pay the contractors?
Crazy, you're telling me it was always a distraction? As a side note; It's nice to see that his taste in interior design always looks identical, no matter what. He's really committed to the overly gaudy, B-rated, villainous anime aristocrat archetype. It's the one thing he's weirdly consistent about.
They can get a phallic shaped rocket from Bezos. I wonder who is going to supply the volcano lair?
Trump has a track record of not paying people. Even court records to prove it. Blows my mind the demo team agreed to do this and now they’re not getting paid. No money, no worky
Man who failed at casinos unable to build ballroom. Who could have forseen this!?!?!
Trump can’t focus long enough, even on his $400 million passion project
Didn't it start out under $100 million?
It started at $200M and as “not affecting the existing structure” and will end as a $900M donation to the Trump presidential library, which will also not be built.
load more comments
(6 replies)
"There is no real direction here, neither lines of power nor cooperation. Decisions are never really made – at best they manage to emerge, from a chaos of peeves, whims, hallucinations and all around assholery."
Not unexpected. He handed all kinds of government jobs to the terminally incompetent.
So he vandalized the Whitehouse for nothing?
No, he did it as a grift. I'm sure most of that money has already disappeared into his bank accounts.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump the destroyer
I think there's a pretty good argument laid out in this video that the ballroom is a literal cover for a bunkered database
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›