this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
573 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26844 readers
1760 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

The whole point of releasing these files is to make them politically exposed. It's literally the exact thing we want.

Hopefully their windows are exposed, too.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 days ago

No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.

[–] ItsMeForRealNow@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

People in politics SHPULD BE FUCKING EXPOSED because it's about GOVT POLICY that affects EVERYONE. NOBODY IN POLITICS SHOULD BE HIDDEN.

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

No they didn’t. They redacted the names of Trump, his allies, and people who bribed him.

The media needs to say what’s actually going on, not just feed us bullshit Trump says.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Ain't no-one more politically exposed than one Donald J Trump.
So, probably, and as far as we know,
Ain't no-one more redacted in the Epstein Files than that Donald J Trump.

I'd put the word president in front of his surname, but he's not worthy of the honour, and he's not worthy of the presidency.

I didn't think there was anyone in the world who could make George W Bush look statesmanlike, well-informed, wise, responsible and honest. I was wrong.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Taxpayer employees are allowed to get away with this kind of shit. Sick and disgusting.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 274 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The judge literally ordered that political consequences were not an excuse for redactions. I hope he starts putting people in jail

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 126 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He will do nothing! ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! The judges in the Untied States are like the parents who say they're going to count to three, and the Trump administration are the kids who have figured out that nothing happens when they get to three.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At the end of the day, the folks who actually enforce rulings are beholden to Trump and his cronies, so they kind of can’t enforce shit

[–] tym@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

If only there were a way to separate the judicial and executive branch.. why didn't the founding fathers think of that?!

[–] Philippe23@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Judges can deputize people to carry out their rulings if need be. So that's not strictly true.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago

That would be a first. I'm not holding my breath.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 42 points 1 week ago

What's this, another court order shamelessly ignored? Fourth box.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago

They were also supposed to release all the files and not some of them, yet here we are.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 229 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Politically exposed individuals.

Here's the question, why are they in the files doing something that merits redacting them?

Call it what it is. You aren't "redacting the names of politically exposed individuals". You are "protecting the reputations of politically-aligned pedophiles".

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 81 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's even exactly the opposite of what the term says.

Keeping the those politicians secret means they remain politically exposed to extortion by any person or government that knows that secret, to the detriment of US national security. Revealing those secrets eliminates any leverage for bad actors.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago

Revealing that secret means the people can't be extorted anymore. There's a narrow window when they can speak freely before....

Well....do you remember The Red Wedding episode of Game of Thrones? Sort of like that, but defenestrations.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 145 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did anyone really expect them to release documents that implicated republicans or their puppeteers? These assholes are blatantly corrupt. As long as they are the gatekeepers, nothing can be trusted.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its not blatant enough or a third of America wouldnt still support him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

This is bullshit.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They were never, ever going to release the files with Trump in them or anyone Trump adjacent.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 6 points 1 week ago

At least we know without a shadow of a doubt the dumb pedophile rapist piece of shit is unmistakably in those files... this completely seals the deal. Legally nothing will be done but, yeah.. the childfucking piece of shit is DEFINITELY in those files. For sure. No doubt. Undoubtedly. No contest. The President of the United States of America is a disgusting pedophile rapist piece of shit.

Just look at him... ugh! [shudder]

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is such a crazy timeline. Everyone knows our president is an ephebophile (pedo into teens). He has flat out stated it. No one is unaware of this fact anymore.

And yet we live in a system where good people are being deported or tortured in prison camps. We can't have government that actually works because our laws are so fucked up that good people get hurt while we all know a pedo rapist is running the country.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He is into 13 year olds. 13 year olds are not 'teens'. Yes, I know how 13 is pronounced. He's still a pedo.

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

i'm just using the technical term.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's time we realize as a species that this world is ran by pure evil. We need to begin responding differently. I don't know what that means, but even after a revolution there are still charismatic psychos that come along and fuck shit up again. People are just too dumb and fall for it over and over and over. How many times does this process need to be repeated before we evolve as a species?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago

Surprising no one.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] dumbass@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago

Add it the pile.

[–] g0nz0li0@piefed.social 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Motherfucker Trump. He’s so obviously implicated and covering. The very thing all those Magat’s claim to fight against: he’s that.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

More daughterfucker than motherfucker in his dreams and on Epstein's plane, if you go by how he talks.

[–] lemmyausmister@feddit.org 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Headline meant republicans

[–] MonkeyDumpster@lemmy.org 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

is the DOJ acting on the names they've redacted? like, are these people going to jail?

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 week ago

Surprised Pikachu!

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think I love Trump and his government purely because they are so blatant at corruption, they expose all of those before them and will surely make everyone question those that follow.

If not.. Then I guess that's it.

If there is an option for Americans to disrupt the republican - democrat party swap, then please, please disrupt the hell out of it in the next election.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Republican child rapists

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

This is a big surprise. I'm sure it was a mistake and they meant to redact something damaging in a different document.

/s

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Applesause@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, not THAT shocked..

[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 week ago

Gotta redact appropriately:

load more comments
view more: next ›