this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
650 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

14070 readers
726 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Visiting southern US for the holidays. There was a truck idling to warm it up yesterday, it was 47F out. We saw the driver walking up as we passed so proceeded to have a conversation about big strong manly men in their big strong manly trucks being able to handle "a bit of a chill".

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

If one of those big trucks runs you over then sue the manufacturer. I'm sure if someone dug deep enough they'd find the old vehicle size standards document out there somewhere.

[–] CaptKoala@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The duality of mankind on full displaym

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Pun intended?

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago
[–] wolfeh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago

I wish I could repossess and crush any trucks like this that aren't being driven through a swamp every day.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When I see something like this, I agree with my country 72% taxation on gas. If they had to pay $8 per gallon like us, they wouldn't buy those monsters

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In California they often reach over 5$ a gallon, and will drive them.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They still buy them and then bitch constantly about how expensive gas is.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Those tires and lift kits cost them 20-30% more fuel, but engineering is for lefties.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, they'll bitch about gas prices being high because of Biden.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Thanks Obummer

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Google says California gas and sales tax together are only about 71¢/gallon.

While we understand gas is expensive in California, relative to the rest of the us, it’s not expensing globally and 71¢/gallon is not much tax globally. The tax really needs to be much higher, for the cost of the roads and other costs to society. Google also claims this tax covers 80% of California road maintenance, so I’d argue it needs to be 25% higher. But that’s only maintenance, not new construction, and doesn’t at all cover the harm done, so really ought to be much higher

California has the highest state gas taxes in the us so the rest of us are much worse.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gas taxes that don’t even cover road maintenance are too low.

Gas taxes that don’t cover the externalised cost of emissions are also too low. But I don’t think any jurisdiction taxes that way.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

My bigger objection are people using this argument to try to add unfairly high EV taxes

No, EV taxes don’t need to cover road maintenance if gas taxes don’t, and no, EV taxes don’t need to be extra high because of a weight penalty, when ice pickups weigh more and the difference is a rounding error relative to big trucks

But I do believe in vice taxes as a way to guide consumer choices. The most fair choice is to tax all road vehicles by miles and weight, without regard to technology, plus a vice taxes on gasoline (like we do with alcohol) to account for the damage it does to society and to discourage use.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Agreed.

`miles * weight * small number

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Monster trucks are street legal there?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If it's anything like the small town I live in, you can't legally have tires that extend further than your fenders, but it's entirely unenforced.

Folks love their lift kits and oversized tires

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago

Bumpers are supposed to be at a certain height for impact with other vehicles, but nobody enforces that either

[–] RDAM_Whiskers@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 days ago

This is fake the bmw isn't double parked and the truck isn't parked at a 45°

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why does a van need wheels that big?

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In use cases duallies are for towing and weight distribution. They help with steering a bit, but for the most part that's for handling very heavy things.

In this case big truck look more manly go BRRRRRRR

The guy that owns that truck would panic if he had to change lanes with a trailer.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dualies at least have widened fender wells and jist in back. They are nice if you actually haul 2tons+ (F150s say they can haul 2tons, but I'd never risk that much, 250s were created for a reason)

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This appears to be a 250 or 350 with some bewildering off road modifications. No serious trail guy would take duallies off road. But he's got off road tires and a trail light system on the front bumper. Unless he's taking a full size camper up the mountain this guy is just an idiot. Actually that's true in either case.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Eh, lots of people in my area use 250s offroad, but only to go up hollers and gather cut wood or drop salt licks and such. Not for entertainment or sport, just work. I try to keep my F150 free from dents and dings, and I do use it like a van for the family, but I got it because I wanted to haul stuff, not for play. (Also, one can fit quite a few 8ft 2x4s or similar in a 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee if one isn't afraid to rest boards on the dashboard in the middle... hence the truck, got paranoid I'd be pulled over)

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To grab pedestrians and cyclists and drag them under. This is illegal in most states except West Virgina and Alabama, but elsewhere the police do not enforce the law.

In rain, the bro wheels throw up spray making visibility dangerous for other vehicles. But fuck them, because MURICAH.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In WV this would fail inspection. The rule is water cannot pass off fender wells onto the tire. People do just swap out before inspections though. There are no good reasons to need wide rims and tires as far as I know.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

Wide tires spread the weight over a larger distance so they are helpful over softer terrain, like a grassy field...but that truck never leaves pavement. They are only helping him have higher rolling resistance and burn more gas.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

So you don't see the guts of pedestrians/cyclists/kids being run over.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 64 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Tyres protruding that far outside the body are seriously dangerous and would be illegal here in Australia.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They are illegal in the States as well, but you'd need someone to actually enforce it.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Slashing tyres is probably moral in this situation.

Just don't get caught.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That's a relief. I do wonder sometimes about the US's safety standards considering some of the pics I've seen. But yeah, how he doesn't get pulled over immediately every time he leaves the house is baffling.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 82 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Don't judge ... that poor man needs that large vehicle in order to accommodate his extremely large penis and enormous testicles ... the loud engine sounds are to warn others of his condition and let everyone know everywhere of what he has to live with ... that poor man ... it's a real problem

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 2 points 13 hours ago

Damn right, this is nothing but gender affirming care.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Cars should be taxed by weight.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Those things are even worse on the road than they are when they're parked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

“Sorry about your dick buddy”

I can tolerate a dirty truck that’s all dented to hell, that person clearly needs their truck for some kind of work. A clean truck that’s large is just screaming “don’t look at my dick”

load more comments
view more: next ›