politics

This particular event was motivated by the DKP showing solidarity with Cuba , so they aren't even pretending this wasn't just in service of US interests.

Anyway, my Christmas present was being called a by German banks, because I still have my account

Is this "authoritarianism"?

The same thing happened to the Rote Hilfe a few days later, a legal aid organization for leftist activists.

May I please know that targeted right-wing groups?

Edit: I swear if Hitler and NSDAP lived today media would claim they're just bunch of oppressed right wing activists.

Please stop making the case for crypto and carrying disease ridden cash

richtig so!!! wir müssen die politische mitte stärken um unsere demokratie™ zu schützen oder so idk.

das /s spar ich mir

😔

I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing.

"Left-Wing" Communism: an Infantile Disorder:

On the one hand, these people seem to have got muddled when they found themselves in a predicament, when the party’s abrupt transition from legality to illegality upset the customary, normal and simple relations between leaders, parties and classes. In Germany, as in other European countries, people had become too accustomed to legality, to the free and proper election of “leaders” at regular party congresses, to the convenient method of testing the class composition of parties through parliamentary elections, mass meetings the press, the sentiments of the trade unions and other associations, etc. When, instead of this customary procedure, it became necessary, because of the stormy development of the revolution and the development of the civil war, to go over rapidly from legality to illegality, to combine the two, and to adopt the “inconvenient” and “undemocratic” methods of selecting, or forming, or preserving “groups of leaders”—people lost their bearings and began to think up some unmitigated nonsense. Certain members of the Communist Party of Holland, who were unlucky enough to be born in a small country with traditions and conditions of highly privileged and highly stable legality, and who had never seen a transition from legality to illegality, probably fell into confusion, lost their heads, and helped create these absurd inventions.

What Is to be Done?:

The government, at first thrown into confusion and committing a number of blunders (e.g., its appeal to the public describing the misdeeds of the socialists, or the banishment of workers from the capitals to provincial industrial centres), very soon adapted itself to the new conditions of the struggle and managed to deploy well its perfectly equipped detachments of agents provocateurs, spies, and gendarmes. Raids became so frequent, affected such a vast number of people, and cleared out the local study circles so thoroughly that the masses of the workers lost literally all their leaders, the movement assumed an amazingly sporadic character, and it became utterly impossible to establish continuity and coherence in the work. The terrible dispersion of the local leaders; the fortuitous character of the study circle memberships; the lack of training in, and the narrow outlook on, theoretical, political, and organisational questions were all the inevitable result of the conditions described above. Things have reached such a pass that in several places the workers, because of our lack of self-restraint and the inability to maintain secrecy, begin to lose faith in the intellectuals and to avoid them; the intellectuals, they say, are much too careless and cause police raids!

But most characteristic, perhaps, is the amazing top-heaviness of the whole “system”, which attempts to bind each single factory and its “committee” by a permanent string of uniform and ludicrously petty rules and a three-stage system of election. Hemmed in by the narrow outlook of Economism, the mind is lost in details that positively reek of red tape and bureaucracy. In practice, of course, three-fourths of the clauses are never applied; on the other hand, a “secret” organisation of this kind, with its central group in each factory, makes it very easy for the gendarmes to carry out raids on a vast scale. The Polish comrades have passed through a similar phase in their movement, with everybody enthusiastic about the extensive organisation of workers’ benefit funds; but they very quickly abandoned this idea when they saw that such organisations only provided rich harvests for the gendarmes. If we have in mind broad workers’ organisations, and not widespread arrests, if we do not want to provide satisfaction to the gendarmes, we must see to it that these organisations remain without any rigid formal structure. But will they be able to function in that case?

My understanding of Lenin is because in Russia the communist parties were banned and had constant secret police (gendarmes) raids and spies, it made them accustomed to illegal activities, and were forced to create an organizational structure that could select leaders without democracy (because if you try and organize everyone together in one building for a vote the police just arrest everyone). So one of the problem with the Western communist parties is that they weren't banned, and became too used to being able to set up collective funds for the trade unions (that police can just steal) and voting for their leaders. Basically that suppression makes the communist parties better at "being illegal" idk.