this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
238 points (98.8% liked)

politics

28657 readers
3176 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

the power in these men pointing is nearly palpable

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 112 points 1 month ago (4 children)

To be clear they have "the other guy is shooting moms in the face on national television" and they went with this instead.

[–] greasewizard@slrpnk.net 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they went with "trump bad" in 2024 and we all know how that turned out for them.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Crazy how easy it is to win over voters by focusing on anti-fascism and affordability instead of just "I'm not the other guy"

So easy even a brown muslim socialist in the heart of America could do it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

(shoots a mom in the face)

(turns toward camera)

"How can Americans afford this?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The other guy is also a known pedophile.

The other guy is also a known rapist.

The other guy is also a known racist.

The other guy is also a known fascist.

We legitimately have the first guy in history that's actually WORSE than literal Hitler. I cannot ever remember anyone saying Hitler was a pedophile. Plus, at least Hitler had a cat.

Omg, I can't believe I'm over here putting Hitler in a good light compared to anyone else.....but here we are.

It reminds me of a thing that was said by Jim Cornette once. If you've never heard of him, Jim Cornette is/was a tv personality in pro wrestling during the 1980s. Not a wrestler, but a manager. The important thing to take away from this is that to say he's a very opinionated person is an understatement.

So, in the 1980s he was working in wrestling in the same organization as a guy named Ole Anderson. He's not important, other than to say in the 1980s Cornette hated the guy.

Then by the 1990s, Cornette is in a different organization working for a guy named Bill Watts. Again, he's not important other than to say that EVERYBODY hates Bill Watts.

Flash forward to around 1997, and he's working alongside a guy named Vince Russo. And of anybody in life, he has hated Russo more than anyone on the planet. He's been quoted in modern times as saying that his plan is to live at least 1 day longer than Russo, just so he can piss on his grave before he dies.

So in 1998 when he briefly met up with Ole Anderson, the guy who he used to hate the most in the 1980s, he said this to Ole:

"There was a time I thought you were worst person walking this planet. Just an absolute scum and absolutely miserable to be around. I actually have a list of people I hate the most. You used to be number one on that list. Well then I met some of these other jackasses, and you've moved down the list, simply by not doing anything differently. I just now have the displeasure of meeting everybody else."

And thats the quote that modern times reminds me of. Hitler has moved down the list simply by not doing anything different just because we now have the displeasure of knowing Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

The "truth" is "poor mom mislead by left hate speech went rogue and an innocent good guy was forced to defend himself". At least in the MAGA world.

Moms being murdered won't convert a single MAGA, they'll cheer it on as long as they are told this mom was aedomestic terrorist.

Affordability affects even the most brainrot MAGA supporter personally.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bringing a knife to a gun fight, …again.

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

looks like just fingers tbh

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Bringing finger guns to a gunfight.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago

Bringing stern pointing to a gun fight

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] goferking0 10 points 1 month ago

Is there a year that doesn't apply.???

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 33 points 1 month ago

Maybe say something about the Stormtroopers all over our nation killing us? Maybe say something about torching all alliances? You can't be this fucken idiotic, can you? Unless... Maybe... The Citizens United crowd wants this?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Affordability

"My opponent wants to send 10,000 armed men to the border to begin seizing women and children, summarily executing any vaguely hispanic looking men, and looting them for their most valuable belongings before casting the survivors out into the desert to starve. And I say we need to consider whether all the money for this program could be better spent on a means-tested plan to subsidies charter schools in low income minority neighborhoods."

“Democrats in the House and Senate [are] focusing on lowering your costs, dealing with affordability. Republicans, led by Donald Trump, are focused on spending treasure and, God forbid, lives on military adventurism overseas,” Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer told reporters this week, just before the chamber voted to advance a resolution halting further attacks on Venezuela without congressional permission.

Fully unironically. Jesus fuck.

Schumer doubled down at his recent press conference, promising that “Democrats are going to make healthcare and other high costs, the high cost of living, the No 1 issue for all of 2026”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spaghetti_hitchens@fedia.io 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I will vote for anyone whose platform is abolishing ICE and prosecuting them and the rest of this administration

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

That certainly wouldn't be the duopoly

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'm a single-issue voter until further notice and this is my single issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Really? ICE is out there brown shirting, but this is what they focus on?

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Affordability AND anti-corruption would be better.

That would give them a mandate to go after regime insiders for their many openly committed financial crimes.

But the Dems would rather let fascism win if the alternative is jailing the rich for their crimes.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A lot of the Dems are corrupt. They have the same donors, the same insider trading, cut the same deals with corps, foreign investories, etc, and the get a cut of the pie.

The reason they didn't prosecute Trump etc, is because then they'd open up themsevles to prosecution for a lot of the same shit. Hence why they foot dragged and just hoped he'd go away.

The reason to become a rep in american politics is to get rich, or richer. It's not to serve your country or make people's lives better. That disappeared in the 90s. Most it's entirely pay to play.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ummm they should be going all in an affordability becauae the country is suffering. Would they just ignore it if the president was Dem?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Guarantee pardons and cash payouts for people that liquidate Republicans and ICE. Use the tactics your enemies use, that you struggle to defeat. You will either win, or discover the flaws in your enemies tactics

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“Democrats in the House and Senate [are] focusing on lowering your costs, dealing with affordability. Republicans, led by Donald Trump, are focused on spending treasure and, God forbid, lives on military adventurism overseas,” Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer told reporters this week, just before the chamber voted to advance a resolution halting further attacks on Venezuela without congressional permission.

Lmao Chuck Schumer is trying to play this card? Hey, how did you feel about throwing away countless lives and money in Iraq and Afghanistan? How about all the money we're spending to help Israel commit genocide? Maybe if some of that had been spent on making things more affordable, we wouldn't be in this situation.

If Chuck Schumer actually believed that for a second, we'd be hearing about his resignation and suicide. It's just a soulless ghoul saying whatever voters want to hear, just so long as it doesn't involve bashing ICE.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Universal healthcare and free college….for Israel

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I wish they wouldn't do this, because people are stupid. People are going to be like "I'll vote for the Democrats bc they're promising to try to fix things", without realizing how much time and effort that's going to take. Biden pulled off a miracle in his soft landing, yet they still voted Trump because the economy wasn't perfect again. And they simply cannot understand that the economy will never be perfect again.

Running on "we'll fix the economy" just sets them up for disappointment and failure, and they're too stupid to see that.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden had an amazing start, with a simultaneous Covid Vaccination Program and an Economic Stimulus Program, and both were wildly successful. That should have made him one of the top 10-15 presidents in history.

Then he appointed the most feckless Republican in history to be his AG, who slow-walked Trump's cases and gave him a two year head start to run out the clock, which is a Trump specialty. The result allowed MAGA back in power.

Now Biden will be in the bottom 10-15, along with those pre-Civil War Presidents who let it happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was more denial of a genocide while providing weapons and money to continue the genocide they claimed wasn't happening, then it was the economy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

the economy is perfect for rich people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You cannot win elections by being "not the other guy".

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Collaborators

load more comments
view more: next ›