this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
193 points (98.5% liked)

News

36534 readers
2171 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. President Donald Trump calls the vessel a new class of “battleship” graced by his own name, but China just calls the U.S. Navy’s latest concept a larger and “easier target” for its growing array of anti-ship drones and missiles.

A day after Trump’s Dec. 22 announcement at Mar-a-Lago that he had ordered the construction of a “Trump class” of possibly 20 to 25 battleships, China’s Global Times, a state media outlet, carried an interview with naval researcher Zhang Junshe stating that the type of warship envisioned by Trump would be a ripe target for China’s anti-ship weapons, including the so-called “carrier killer” DF-21D ballistic missile.

“The large size of a battleship also makes it more vulnerable and potentially an easier target, particularly when it is densely loaded with munitions,” according to Zhang, a researcher at the People’s Liberation Army Naval Military Academic Research Institute.

In the wake of the announcement, some analysts suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately be not be realistic and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake the U.S. shipbuilding industry, which lags far behind China.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 month ago (3 children)

... instead a move by Trump to jolt awake the U.S. shipbuilding industry, which lags far behind China.

I think they're giving shit-for-brains way too much credit here.

[–] TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More sanewashing from the complicit media

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Or some low level christo-fascist management dude at the heritage foundation, that knows nothing about anything had an idea. And now Americans will pay their lives and waste of taxes.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This always happens.

Trump: I'm gonna poop in the rose garden!

Sycophants: Of course the president isn't going to poop in the rose garden, the woke media is crazy.

Trump (while pooping in the rise garden): I'm pooping in the rose garden!

Sycophants: The rose garden is where terrorists come from.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

He's definitely shat in the Rose Garden. Some probably leaked down his leg and touched the ground there.

[–] hector@lemmy.today -1 points 1 month ago

The US navy is way bigger than China's, so I would question that the US shipbuilding industry lags China. I would also recognize that contractors wanting more money spent pump articles warning us about China and saying China is outpacing us.

Like in the cold war, the ussr was constantly overhyped in capability to justify more spending.

I know China is quick building ships. I do however doubt they are anywhere near the US, no matter how many ships they are working on right now or what. I also highly doubt the US should increase yet again our navies size.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s just a scam like everything else he does, a mechanism to move money around and funnel it to his political patrons, friends, and family. No doubt everyone involved knows that battle ships are basically obsolete among the great powers. It’ll end up being a comical piece of shit, but several people will have made a lot of money off the contracts.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

That's the thing, putting his name on everything, being supremely corrupt, does he not realize after he's gone his name will be removed? Does he think even is successor will continue to revere his name rather than blame problems on him?

Or does he not care? Like the peace prize, even though he knows everyone around his is pretending to think he's great he doesn't care? It's really a case study in late stage mental illness. Where his illness is laid bare by dementia and old age and any pretense is stripped of his actions.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 22 points 1 month ago

It's called the Trump class because it's full of Bubba's sea-men

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Motherfucker doesn't understand you get things named after you by people who respect you after you're gone, not by your own decision. Classless moron.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

He knows. He just craves the attention.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

US: The Trump Centre for Destroying American Hegemony. :applause:

China: :popcorn:

Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

A fart class boat. Probably be fat and ugly and barely able to actually DO anything...

[–] hector@lemmy.today 17 points 1 month ago

Everyone has called them that for decades, half a century or more. Big battleships are a thing of the past, ww2 their last hurrah. They are too vulnerable and with the weapons out there, it's better to have more smaller ships than a single big one that could be taken out with one missile or torpedo or mine breaking through.

This is like Hitler getting personally involved in weapons decisions in the war. At one point he took machine guns off the top of tanks for whatever reason he got into his head, determined he was the smartest person in the world. Turned out making them even more of sitting ducks to infantry on the eastern front.

Likewise our leader is surrounded by yes men. No one will tell him he's wrong, and if they did they would be removed from their positions. So you get outdated super battleships rather than the frigates we have been making.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good point, but look at the catapults it’ll have for launching fighters. Proper traditional steam catapults with analogue warmth, none of that modern digital rubbish.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

And they'll paint camouflage all over them, for "stealth".

Who would have thought …

Ho wait everyone

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I'm surprised they didn't just stay quiet in public (and laugh their asses off in private). China usually seems to keep their cards fairly close to their chest...

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

Put Trump on it and use it as a decoy.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"China calls..." and it's some dude.

Imagine if newspapers used this convention for random American civilian citizens in headlines too.