this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
498 points (99.6% liked)

News

36512 readers
2206 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 135 points 1 month ago (5 children)

- Make car dependant infrastructure for every single city or town
- Refuse to innovate, build only "luxury" models
- ????
- Profit

[–] riskiedingo@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Similarly with housing. Why make cheap starter homes when you can make so much more with “Luxury” homes and condos.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And yet use the same cheap materials in the "luxury" ones that you would have used in the cheap ones anyway!

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I follow some home inspectors who post videos from their new home inspections, and holy crap the things they find are ridiculous. Like, construction companies should lose their licenses bad.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I visit some partially built homes from time to time, and recently saw one just after it had been inspected. On one wall, on the insulation, the inspector had scrawled STUD? In red felt.

The stud was completely missing from the wall. It was just an empty frame filled with insulation. You’d think someone would have noticed earlier during construction, but obviously the actual contractor had just let the day labor go to town and never bothered to review their work before inspection.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quoll 18 points 1 month ago

lol, that is 100% every australian apartment built in the last 15 years. the window frames are plastic and the cladding is combustible... but it's got Italian tiles and "European appliances" so it's an "executive suite". that will be $1.5million fuck you very much.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • Force you to rent an apartment
  • Refuse to build anything affordable, only "luxury" models
  • ???
  • Profit
[–] Guitarfun@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't forget the government cutting funding for affordable housing projects.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Amateur hour, my government funds 'affordable' housing projects that cost 300 grand and immediately turn into overpriced rentals.

[–] Guitarfun@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

At least housing is actually being built, but I know what you mean. Theres no real affordable housing near me and the wait list for what little is available has been closed due to budget cuts.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago
  • Capitalism
  • ???
  • Planetary Doom
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks to the invention of debt, we can continue taking from the poor what they don’t even have!

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

They do have it. It's the value they generate while working. That's what we've always taken, regardless of the exact financial tool used.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry I didn't get that, did you say you wanted an even larger pickup truck?

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can you jack up the front so I can't see and put a bar on it so I can kill anyone I hit? Thanks.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We're way ahead of you! Our engineers have worked tirelessly to come up with an extra flat front that maximises impact with unsuspecting pedestrians

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. Cede sedans to Japanese car companies.
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Even they aren't selling them as much in the US any more. You don't really see many new Accords or Camrys any more, you see CR-Vs and Rav4s.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  1. Dogmatically sticking to fossil fuels.
  2. "Protecting" domestic manufacturering jobs by refusing to engage with your neighbours.
  3. Using tariffs to keep out affordable Chinese EVs that use tech everyone will probably be using in 15 to 20 years.

Sounds like a recipe for disaster. You can only artificially prop up your domestic market for so long. You'll inevitably fall behind even further on innovation with this approach.

Might be the first to make a CoPilot or ChatGPT powered car though.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Look, the Chinese EVs are a literal trade weapon. The other points I agree on. But China has subsidies on EVs even when sold to other countries because they aim to put competitors out of business globally. Otherwise they'd just be subsidizing EVs for domestic use.

So I can't blame them for tariffing those. But the solution is to invest heavily in domestic EVs, not to keep running with internal combustion...

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I saw something about being approved for "up to 100k" for a car loan. 100k for a car? Man, this country is fucked.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'm told that Americans only want big expensive cars but for some reason the government felt the need to slap 100% tariffs on small inexpensive Chinese cars.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HisArmsOpen@crust.piefed.social 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump tariffs combined with the policy to 'make in America and buy American' is going as well as predicted then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

As soon as someone releases a small electric pickup truck, I'm grabbing one and holding on to it as long as possible. It's gotta have LFP batteries, though. Those last a long time.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Slate is making one that should be out in 2027. Ford was supposed to be planning one, but considering how they’ve been flailing, i doubt we will ever see it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

I'm on the same boat, though I have a lot more requirements on what I want that electric truck to NOT include. I want a proper work truck that's user serviceable - not a computer on wheels. Untill that, I'll stick with my -07 diesel Navara.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Tbh i don't think i will ever buy a new car. New doesn't even mean "good" or "reliable" at this point, just a warranty and that they don't know for sure what or how much is going to break in 10K miles. Its literally paying more to be a beta tester.

At least after a couple years third party techs have mostly figured out where the manufacturer cheaped out and how to fix it for less than the dealership wants.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I just want a small car I can work on myself. 30 years ago, I could maintain my own car, do some shadetree mechanics...

But all cars today are meant to be black boxes. All need proprietary tools and computers to do almost anything.

Dear Santa, could I have a 67 camaro.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

hugs Civic si

you'll get all the motors and transmissions you need, widdle guy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] neoscaler@feddit.org 14 points 1 month ago

Paying massive tariffs could be part of the problem.

[–] evol@lemmy.today 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Similar to how China let Tesla in to force its domestic market to compete (Which now makes the best EV's in the world) America should do the same. Let BYD or Xiaomi sell cars in the states, Musk and co. can then compete or lose to the Chinese. With musk's close ties to the admin I doubt this will happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Most American cars are made outside of the USA, and most countries that supply cars and parts and under tariffs from King Dingus so yeah, cars are fucking expensive NOW. They were already trending higher.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 13 points 1 month ago

Hurray! The GDP is saved!

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

All hail the supreme leader Trump. Yes, he maybe a pedo, rapist and multiple convicted felon, as well as a failed businessman, but he really represents the American dream........

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Sometimes I just want a car with power windows. That's it. I'll Putin my own deck and call it a day.

I don't need a zillion sensors worth 1k a piece and all that bullshit.

Now make me a 15k car which is brand new.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

For some reason most of America decided that they needed a massive truck or SUV that could haul a semi trailer yet their needs 99.9% of the time are short trips and buying groceries.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Well you need to BE SAFE and walking is SCARY.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (22 children)

The 1965 dodge dart cost $2153 when it released. That's $22,004.55 according to an inflation calculator I found online. The dart is a badass car, imaging bying a sick muscle car today for less than 25 grand.

The charger 2 door, which is the closest dodge comparable to the dart. It starts at $54,995. Over double.

I realize dodge's sales model is different and the market itself likely couldn't be compared. But how the hell are we paying over double for vehicles that fit similar market slots? We are so fucked.

Edit: Dodgers to Dodge's. Seriously autocorrect just doesn't work.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

A literal decade late on that headline, good work CNN!

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Step 1: oligopoly. Step 2: Make less stuff, make it worse, and make it more expensive. Step 3: Use the wealth hoarded that way to make it easier to become a monopoly.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

Unsustainable grift is unsustainable? Wow I'm shocked.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Mass transit systems yet? No? Okay, I'll check back in a decade after this problem has gotten substantially worse.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

walk, bus, ride, roll, scoot…if you can!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›