this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
82 points (98.8% liked)

technology

24251 readers
315 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 59 points 4 weeks ago

Wow how cruel.

Not only are STEM majors going to have their jobs taken away by AI (in this idiot's wild fantasies broadcast to his jittery shareholders)

They're going to use the same "lol you went to school for art history" line they used on everyone in 2008

[–] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 49 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Fascists feign admiration for blue collar laborers as the manly alternative to white collar effetes but he's nakedly admitting that they are viewed as peasants.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Literally something has always been sus on how these types of porks insist jobs like scientist, software dev, analysts are “unbecoming” and claim we “are supposed to” do blue collar work instead. No hate to people who do skilled trades but hearing an uncle curse out his asshole plumber boss all your life makes you really want to use your degree, and if I deny some spoiled nepo baby the chance to live vicariously through my “manly noble sacrifice” and feel manly vicariously? All the better.

Another horror story of communism coming true under capitalism. A smug elite get to choose your job for you.

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 38 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Oh boy, oh boy! That sounds super sustainable and totally reasonable!

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 36 points 4 weeks ago

he's such a fucking tool

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 35 points 4 weeks ago

Why wouldn't you automate that work? What a stupid system of production.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 31 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

"doomscroller / gatherer" based society

[–] miz@hexbear.net 27 points 4 weeks ago

Taika Waititi got into a teleporter with Steven Pinker and a huge bag of cocaine and Alex Karp is what came out the other end

[–] OgdenTO@hexbear.net 24 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The AI will write for other AI to read while humans work in the fields

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Humans won't eat the corn they grow, however. That's vital ethanol for the server farms

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 13 points 4 weeks ago

Wait....actually that makes a lot of sense; we grow the corn for the server farms and we eat the bugs plaguing the crops (after paying a fee for eating on the job, and another fee for eating bugs legally on the owner's plantation which makes them theirs).

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@hexbear.net 23 points 4 weeks ago

The one true western orthodox maoist alex kkkarp and his plan on reviving the peasantry in the imperial core as they are the most revolutionary class capable of protracted peoples war. I salute you comrade kkkarp! rat-salute

[–] DasRav@hexbear.net 22 points 4 weeks ago

Such contradictions, so heightened.

[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

Very cool, looking forward to when the manufacturing is also automated.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 weeks ago

Amazon shows how automation actually works under capitalism - the robots do all the easiest jobs so humans are forced to do harder and harder work for less and less pay, and the robots break all the time and so the humans have to pick up their slack.

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 18 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It is actually much easier to automate most manufacturing, but the profit margins aren't quite high enough to push it through. More money to be made on finance gambling and rent seeking.

[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Skipping over a great deal of explanations, we know from the labor theory of value that value can be added when making a product when socially necessary labor is being employed in its manufacture. If something can be completely automated from start to finish, then the value added will tend to zero rather quickly as the labor needed to make something of this type becomes zero. Crucially, not everyone needs to adopt automation for the social necessity of the labor to change. Only one or a few firms need to do it for this change to take place and then typically the others will be outcompeted over a short period as the profit they can take goes to shit.

This is why I find the trend of using AI to automate software engineering rather amusing as a software engineer. If completely successful it could remove one of the best paying jobs from the US economy entirely as the production of software by humans would no longer be socially necessary, the same as other things that can be automated. Then software engineers can all fulfil their destinies of becoming Factorio Youtubers.

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, that is how automation functions in competitive industrial capitalism. The key is that finance capital is in charge and has been for ages. They are already monopolies, or really owners of diversified monopolies, looking to steal each other's lunches and scrape the barrel for profit via leveraging.

A simple example is Uber. Sure, having an app to get a taxi seems like an automation that bested the competition. But really it was the financial leveraging that led the way: it was cheap, the finance companies subsidized the price to drive market share, then raised prices once they had monopolies. This tech-finance combination is the heart of silicon valley, and is also federally subsidized. It is simultaneously key for US worldwide tech dominance.

"AI" is primarily driven in this way as well. It is massively overleveraged and the actual tech is not actually that useful, it doesn't really make a particularly better product and the baseline to which it does it underwhelming. But they hope that there will be some general use case that solidifies it so that they can be one of the monopolies that jacks up prices once they have the market share. One of their major potential customers is C-suites at tech companies, people who are (1) hype beasts who desperately want to market their company as "with it" and therefore purchasable for a high price by the monopolies, (2) themselves over leveraged on finance and desperate to smugly fire 75% of their workforce if their finance papers can still look good at the end, and (3) are extremely gullible when it comes to any topic with these qualities. The key here is that "AI" doesn't even need to competently automate, and with software, it truly does not. It's a faster prototyper, maybe, but it makes so many fundamental errors, of a predictable-yet-not-fixable-by-a-non-expert type, that you can't actually fire any significant number of people and get the same productivity. It really just clarifies the role of engineers, which is not code monkeying, but identifying project scope, planning, maintaining, security, and sometimes, rarely, solving algorithmic or math problems. An example of this is C-suites showing everyone the "app" they vibe coded that is basically just a more verbose tutorial app with some menus. Congratulations Brad, you really did it. You made an app that doesn't do any of the things spec's out by your product team as core necessities because you were spending half your time for the last month not thinking about that at all and instead begging a prompt to write code. The core issue of clarity of thought and planning, or really the absence of it, is laid bare. And God help you if data analysis is required.

[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 4 weeks ago

I'm getting a message on my walkie talkie. It sounds like it has already been done. Well, nevertheless.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

In about 10 years later:

porky-happy: “Whoa, what do you MEAN you expected to live a life off of being a worker! I like business so everyone should now all be their own little businessman and start their own businesses! I made labor free, you’re welcome!”

Calling it now, all the romanticization of being a one-man entrepreneur is going to go up to 11 pretty soon.

Hell, I’m seeing some of it already with all the ads marketing products “for your business” and all the shit job advice for people who can’t get one to simply start their own business.

[–] CarbonConscious@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

And you'll "own your own business" the same way that you're currently an "independent contractor" working for Uber.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They will never be able to fully automate it. To contradict @queermunist@lemmy.ml abit here, what automation allows for is the simplification and breakdown of repetitious tasks, such as monitoring or sorting. Sometimes these can be complex in nature, but simplified through automation. However, atart up, shut down, and maintenance are still human tasks and will remain so for the near and far future, alongside design, most visual quality control checks, and detail work.

However, to agree with what she said part of the problem is that companies will often get contracts under the assumption that the automation works perfectly, which as an engineer, trust me it never does, and businesses always short-staff their maintenance and automation departments because they hate the idea of someone sitting around waiting for something bad to happen (inefficiency to them) even though that is the proper workflow for those areas, which is hurry up and wait. It's wild that they understand that for sales and quality control, but if it's a blue collar worker suddenly they have to be sweating their ass off 24/7 or they are a drain on the company.

True automation will require a complete redesign of factories and machines on a scale unfathomable under capitalism.

[–] GenXen@hexbear.net 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The only way this dude's story makes sense is that he's been a complete [word commonly used to indicate involvement in the CIA but possibly banned because it can also be used as a racist slur, I guess?] since college.

[–] Antiwork@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes there's a movie and book that covers the interrelation of the said word.

[–] GenXen@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A movie AND a book you say!?

[–] Antiwork@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

you can find both "by the front door"

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 9 points 4 weeks ago

I remember George Carlin saying you could "get the job done with your bare hands", a long time ago.

[–] a_party_german@hexbear.net 9 points 4 weeks ago

well at least he's not coked out this time.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Something tells me it's not him the one that gonna do any manual labour.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Does shooting billionaires count as manual labor?

Does providing for those who shoot billionaires count?