this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
380 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28181 readers
2830 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 162 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just fucking pay the tax, dickwad.

[–] bmarbe@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Actually, there's a huge return on investment with bribes and political influence when you're a billionaire.

Citizens united was a death blow.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reaganomics -> Contra -> Bush Sr -> Citizens United -> 9/11 -> Patriot Act -> Middle East wars -> bank bailouts -> Pause for pandemic -> insurrection -> old man Biden sleeps on imprisoning trump -> literal gestapo in the streets.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

Citizen's United was in 2010.

But other than that, yeah it's been a long, slow fade...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly. If they can bribe millions, they know they stand to make billions in returns.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

High taxes are the compromise, we still have the torches and pitchforks if they're not interested

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Personally, I prefer sickles and hammers, and at this point I no longer want to compromise with the billionaires.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 89 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

When they pay obscene amounts of money to prevent paying taxes, or break unions, or disenfranchise voters, it's because they calculate that the obscene amount of money is less than what they'd expend otherwise.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 2 weeks ago

Don't forget their ego

They may spend more in fighting it than they would in paying tax, but to avoid paying tax is a part of their identity

I'm proud to pay tax. I want to make my society better. I was rich once, and I could have paid less tax, but I didn't avoid it because I knew that arseholes like these were making the world worse, and I wasn't going to be a part of the problem

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly - in the event that this nature fails, California should just unleash a barrage of similar legislation like this, year after year. Eventually it would end up cheaper to just pay the taxes than continually fight against it.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

That would make the California GOP rich...

[–] bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world 61 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's pretty much exactly what the Antichrist would do.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No no no, the anti-Christ is obviously every single person who opposes invasive tech and the obscenity of billionaires. Doing the exact opposite of what Christ would do doesn't make you the anti-Christ, that would be too obvious.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lobbying needs to gtfo and be illegal already. We don't talk enough about it because the America is on a tilt-a-whirl as it is

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

Campaign Finance Reform is the issue from which ALL other issues flow.

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is he spending more to fight the tax than he would pay in tax?

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

🤣 No....

These ghouls save billions by spending millions

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

The sad fact is that it works. They defeated similar changes in illinois just a few years ago by spending millions on advertisements telling people that the tax changes would ruin their lives.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

yea that is trickle down economics for you. millions trickle down to politicians so that tech oligarchs can keep their billions

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In a just world we would follow the money, and charge them with treason.

Oh and also freeze all his accounts, then charge every member of his staff associated with treason and him as well.

Manipulating voters or congressmembers is treason. If they want the death penalty to exist. Give it to all of them that don't rat out their senior who commanded it.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago

Will no one rid us of this turbulent cunt?

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If that shithead wants it, that's how you know it's bad and should be opposed.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Newsom is opposed to it, too, so you extra know it's bad.

[–] atropa@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

Another scam artist ,move on nothing to see here

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

DE-MO-CRA-CY!

[–] AccoSpoot@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

What a fucken ghoul.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Did he give every citizens of California a million dollars? That might work.