this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
337 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

79762 readers
4203 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mohab@piefed.social 85 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You know, watching cartoons when I was young, I always thought it's unrealistic the bad guys keep trying the same insane plan to "take over the world" or whatever when the hero had foiled like 1,000 of those already… I always thought "no way villains are this stupid"

Fuck me, what did I know? Turns out they actually are.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 51 points 3 days ago

"I only have to win once." - Lex Luthor

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Actually I always thought it was insane that they DIDN'T try the same insane plan more than once.

Like, half the time Cobra's crazy plan ALMOST worked. But either luck or some fixable hole in the plan stopped it. But if they just tried it again but just learn from the failure, address the problems they hit, and try again. Maybe even a third time.

But no, they'd always just try some other totally insane plan instead. Every time.

In this case they're trying stuff that has, in some cases, worked.

I don't think they're shooting for Germany 1938. They're shooting closer to Putin's Russia. One of many "successful" totalitarian takeovers.

[–] robomuffin79@lemmy.world 87 points 3 days ago

It was never about who owned it or privacy concerns. It was always about censorship and controlling what young Americans could see

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 49 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So... USA-ownership looks even worse than a Chinese one? :)

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Eh, it's actually a wash. China did the exact same shit with different key words. They were just smarter about it.

And most of the censorship was in China.

Because China is a totalitarian dictatorship, and is no ones friend.

Just because the US is shit, doesn't make China any better. The world isn't black and white, it's mostly black and dark grey.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So China-ownership was better because it censored China-related stuff in China and didn't care much about other themes in other countries. It is exactly what your colorful analogy means. The world isn't black and white indeed:)

[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

Sure, if you gloss over the "most" part and replace it with "all".

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Except for the subtle Chinese propaganda constantly fed to the rest of the world. Now the propaganda is blatant enough for people to abandon the app, so the world is technically better for the US seizure. The app went to shit, but it was already pretty bad, so no net loss there.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Now the propaganda is blatant enough for people to abandon the app, so the world is technically better for the US seizure

Right because homegrown propaganda tastes so much better than foreign.

Invade, Invade, Invade, Yum, Yum, Yum!

You know US only controls the tiktok infra in the US market, right?

Are you one of those "us is the center of the universe" guys?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Maybe to left leaning Americans. To a European like me they look essentially identically bad and promote authoritarianism. I wouldn‘t use either version.

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Associated Press shouldn't take their 'glitch' claims at face value.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It's not a ~~glitch~~ bug, it's a feature.

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Apparently some people are going over to UpScrolled. It is an Palestinian-made app similar to TikTok/ Instagram.

I have tried UpScrolled but it is still barebones but seems interesting (imo).

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Is that the one that uses peer to peer tech to share videos?

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That name just sounds like a phishing domain...

Never really tried tiktok, notgoing to try this app either. I hope someone makes a frontend for it like redlib or nitter, so I selfhost and redirect links.

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

EDIT: Read wrong. You don’t have to try the app if you don’t want to. Up to you.

Don’t know about Redlib nor about Nitter.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From what I've heard it's got a worse Nazi problem than Twitter

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have joined ~~yesterday~~ two days ago and so far, no Nazi problem on my feed. However, it is mostly regarding politics.

I keep my feed focused on anime as far as that’s possible.