this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
520 points (99.4% liked)

News

34718 readers
3223 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alpha1beta@piefed.social 16 points 7 hours ago

It's about time Congress woke the fuck up. The only option here is to impeach - this is textbook corruption that would make Senator Menendez blush.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 32 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

None of us could afford to, but DAMN is it cheap to buy Diaper Don (relatively speaking). The tariff revenue that Americans would generate on Swiss imports FAR exceeds the value of a watch and a bar of gold.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 5 hours ago

Because he doesn't give a flying hoot about the American people. Or to be honest really his party. This is all just a grift for him.

Europe strategy seems to be more to just threaten him, it's unclear with what but he seems to have backed off tariffs in the EU, but I guess Switzerland felt that they needed to go the bride route. I don't know why because I guarantee Trump thinks Switzerland is in the EU

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

Bribing politicians is cheap, it's generally millions for billions and more like 100k to billion for small politicians.

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 190 points 13 hours ago (7 children)

US Constitution Article 1 Section 9 Clause 8, "Titles of Nobility and Foreign Emoluments":

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

It's literally unconstitutional. In the past, foreign gifts to presidents were typically turned over to the National Archives to avoid breaking the law. If Congress was a functional governing body they would rake him over the coals for this, among the hundred other laws Trump has casually flaunted.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 97 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah emoluments clause went out the window in trumps first term. Like week one, probably.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 10 hours ago

The Quid Pro Quo Potus

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

The fig leaf was that his family were running the business side, not him.

Keeping a watch and gold bar has no fig leaf.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 19 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Clearly, it doesn't mean things like airplanes, watches, and gold bars. It's written right there, anybody can see it, it's just that Libz can't read because of their public school education. They don't even make emoluments any more, that was an olden days thing, like Laudanum.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 39 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Congress and functioning while the republicans have the majority is an oxymoron.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

At least we have SCOTUS as a check on his powers!

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 17 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yup, they’re working on a blank check…

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That is after they figure out how to make CA's new maps illegal after saying TX's maps were just fine.

[–] molestme247@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Yeah right? Should be reason enough to burn this place down

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

They already signed that one.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"he didn't accept it for himself, it's for the presidential library"

Hahaha gotteem

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago

"It's a PERFECT deal."

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We need a brand new congress. End literally every one if their terms and vote in new people.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There's a handful I'd keep, and a handful I'd execute. The rest can go, from both sides.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago

~~Fuck~~ Eject, marry, kill

Eject all but a handful or two of the Democrats, marry Bernie, kill the fascists.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, well, it doesn’t say anything about bribes, so checkmate, librul!

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

tHiS shOULd FiNish HiM tHIs TiMe

h3 bRUcK t3h L0R3

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 34 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

"C'mon, let's cut the crap, here's a big hunk of gold. Deal?"

"Deal!"

MAGA Diplomacy

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

I mean Washington has been like that for a while but usually "campaign donations"

Most of Trump's bullshit is just saying the quiet part out loud. He is especially brazen about it and it doesn't make suck less.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 66 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Look, you don't need to demand answers to the turd:

It's a bribe. That's it. Your prez took a bribe to cut tariffs to a country.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 15 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Good think our system actually predicted this and its illegal even if it WEREN'T a bribe:

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

without the Consent of the Congress

I mean, he's a sack of shit for certain, but Congress has the power to stop this and will not, so it is implicit consent.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Congress has the power to stop this and will not, so it is implicit consent.

That is not what consent is

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

First, I agree with you. But, even if Congress opposes him accepting it, they can't enforce it. Pretty sure Congress wrote into law that we were supposed to have the Epstein files a month ago.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Congress can impeach and convict for any offense at all, which would remove him from the presidency. Short of that, a president may do as he pleases, because the courts have no similar analog. Sad to say it, but it's true.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 72 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A gold bar? A fuckin' gold bar?

Didn't he whine about Bob Menendez doing literally this not long ago?

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 48 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

"rules for thee and not for me" could be the regime's most consistent mantra

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Wilhoit keeps winning.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That should be illegal for everyone.

Also any Democrat that is involved in corruption shouldn't be trusted to work for the people. If someone is corrupted it is easy to buy them.

[–] valek879@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

It's not illegal for everyone because not everyone holds a public office... It is however already completely illegal for anyone holding a government job.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 11 hours ago

Only if they don't have the consent of congress. Congress however consents to whatever the fuck Trump tells them to.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

Well trump is and Memendez was working for the government.

By "everyone" I of course meant people working for the government.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 44 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The answer is because nobody is going to stop him.

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ding ding ding! Tell em what he's won, bob!

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

He's won an all expenses paid trip to Alligator Alcatraz! (cue jazzy fanfare music as the camera pans over the Everglades)

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

100k investment 1000000k payout.

[–] thoralf@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 hours ago

What aber does he expect. Trump is as corrupt as it gets. Isn’t that obvious?

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Supreme Court has ruled that you have to explicitly shout "THIS IS A BRIBE" then wink one eye while shooting finger guns and making that clicking sound with your tongue when exchanging gifts or money to be considered a bribe.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 8 points 12 hours ago

The Supreme Court has ruled that this particular POTUS can do nothing illegal while performing an act of state. Since he accepted this bribe specifically as an act of state, it’s a legal bribe by their reasoning.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Unless you're a Dem, then it's a bribe if someone says , "Hello" to you.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Yes sir, I have it on good faith that this democratic senator received a bribe of emotional gratification when the Canadian delegate wished her a nice day, to which she replied "You too", which is clearly indicative of some sort of illegal quid pro quo relationship.

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago

Hi Senator,

It was a bribe. Hope that answers your questions.

Sincerely, Everyone with a functioning brain.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 4 points 12 hours ago

Trump being corrupt is just another day in the Orange Republic

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Its fine. I'm sure, just like the jet, they will be "donated" to his presidental library but for security, of course, he will need to take them with him everywhere at all times.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Trump - "Don't care, got money."

Rules for thee, but not for me

load more comments
view more: next ›