this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
285 points (99.0% liked)

politics

27705 readers
4108 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

Critics still went to see it and might make others curious to watch it over how bad it is.

That's unacceptable. It needs complete ignoring. The only review about this movie should be focusing on the Epstein files.

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 7 points 11 hours ago

Least torented movie ever.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 109 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Melania actually had a 12 minute sex scene where she humps a rhino.

You can't prove that it didn't happen because you didn't watch the movie.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 53 points 21 hours ago

It was beautiful that she moaned "It's Morbin' time!" when she came.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t even watch a Rifftrax take on this.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I'm wondering if The Flophouse is going to do an episode on it.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 8 points 19 hours ago

I haven't watched the movie but I choose to believe this is true and will dutifully share this information

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

Even if it did who wants to watch the equivalent of sentient silicone have sex?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

Normally even a chance of some rhino smut would get me to watch something, but no way it's worth it here. Nice try maga

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Why not? There was one in Okja.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 37 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

More people have paid to be in Melania than have paid to see ‘Melania.’

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Are we still talking about the movie?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I really don't care, do u?

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago
[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 5 points 14 hours ago

Wow, prolific sex pest Brett Ratner made a documentary about another sex pest's wife? AND Amazon is distributing it? Just a list of deplorables, isn't it?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Did people expect anything else? Do you need critics to tell you this? This is just a bribe to a crime family of grifters.

[–] Hazmatastic@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

No, but it will be amusing to look back on in 50 years or so

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 45 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

In a one-star review, The Guardian critic Xan Brooks slammed “Melania” as a film that “doesn’t have a single redeeming quality,” comparing it to a “medieval tribute to placate the greedy king on his throne.” Brooks said the film offers few revelations about its subject, who “moves through the action like a listless automaton, talking constantly but saying nothing.” In another one-star review, The Independent critic Nick Hilton called the first lady a “scowling void of pure nothingness in this ghastly bit of propaganda.” He suggested the film is “part sop to Big Tech companies who require constant regulatory approval for financial manoeuvrings,” citing Amazon’s big investment in the movie and appearances by billionaires Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, who are included in footage of Trump’s inaugural celebrations. The Atlantic writer Sophie Gilbert called “Melania” a “disgrace,” criticizing Trump for profiting off the project while in office. Other critics said the documentary was aimless and that Trump appeared to be uncomfortable being filmed. Variety critic Daniel D’Addario said the documentary is “primarily a film about a woman walking into and out of rooms,” while Gilbert said Ratner “seems desperate to find action, but there is none, stating for much of the film, the camera captures Trump “walking from liminal place to liminal place in five-inch heels.”

[–] October1@lemmy.world 51 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump “walking from liminal place to liminal place in five-inch heels.”

The funny thing is I don't know if they're talking about melania or donald in his lifts

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Hahahaha I had to reread bc I imagined Donald automatically and never questioned it.

[–] October1@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

Same! I thought - "wow this movie reviewer really threw down" then I remembered melania is also trump

[–] redbrick@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Every time I see her pictures...I see Gold-digger, and she ain't messing with not broke.... Yeah we know what's you're all about Melania...

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 14 points 21 hours ago

It was successful the day she got paid. After that, it doesn’t matter.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Love to see it, but yes, Bezos and Trump don't care since the bribe happened.

Currently a 5 (out of 100) Metacritic score, with a user review score of 0.6 (out of 10).

Rotten Tomatoes at 8 (out of 100). No user review score yet, but there's a big bot astroturfing campaign with 5-star reviews flooding the user reviews section.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

A fantastic flick, our theater was sold out and erupted in applause and cheers at the end of the show.

I don't know, that definitely seems like a real person to me. /s

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Why would it have been anything else?

[–] marius@feddit.org 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

It could have also been an ad for a scam product

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Maybe she'll sell Trump brand gold vagina egg things like Gwyneth Paltrow

[–] notastatist@feddit.org 5 points 21 hours ago

I mean, there are ads for this movie...

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 11 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

This film better win some razzies

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 8 points 19 hours ago

Razzies give shitty movies attention.

This movie, like everything Trump, needs to be buried in a dump.

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 10 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Hopefully it’s just shunned. But we all know there’s an academy award nomination on the way

[–] notastatist@feddit.org 10 points 21 hours ago

it will be coming from FIFA right tomorrow!

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 7 points 21 hours ago

Well whatever the awards are I bet orange one will steal them.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I'm pretty sure Donvict deserves a Nobel Peace prize for this movie.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago

👏
It's
👏
A
👏
Bribe!