Most (not all) of Gavin's problems come from completely optional crap he does. He didn't need a podcast. He really doesn't need to go on conservative podcasts either. Every time he attempts to reach across the aisle, it earns him nothing with conservatives and pisses off his base.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Newsom would keep ice and the patriot act in place and wouldn't even fix the cost of living
He's a hollow bell that tolls for money
Yup. When the rubber meets the profits Newsom will always side with capital. It's he better than trump? Yes. But is he the man to fix our nation. Absolutely not.
Exactly!
The problem with Gavin Newsom is they could swap him with Billy Crudup doing a bit and I wouldn’t notice.
Yeah, Newsom would be an extremely depressing dystopian candidate. I want Ro Khanna or AOC. Or either one as president and vice president.
Ro Khanna is just lighting things up this year. Very pleased with everything he's been doing
He doesn't have a chance, because it's going to be a fair primary all the way thru.
They might be able to buy the first couple states especially if they start early, but they can't keep up the whole cycle which is why prior DNCs always tried to call it like 2 weeks after the first states vote.
2028 will run until ever state votes, and the DNC isn't going to favor anyone.
So the only chance Newsom has, is depressing turnout for the primary.
Which is why so many people keep acting like the DNC hasn't changed, they've already fell for the propaganda and are spreading it.
He doesn’t have a chance, because it’s going to be a fair primary all the way thru.
I'm not sure the Dems remember how to do one of those.
why do you think the primarys will be fair this time and that the DNC won't favour a corporate Democrat? There's been no evidence or prior indications that this will be the case this time that I have seen.
why do you think the primarys will be fair this time and that the DNC won’t favour a corporate Democrat
Because the chair is all powerful and accountable to no one...
And the new one led Minnesota for like a decade and ran fair primaries turning a purple state progressive without any bias.
It's been a year, and they've been sending record breaking levels of funding back to state parties, that's why we keep "over performing" in special elections.
What's important here, is that this funding was a cudgel wielded by prior neoliberals: do what we saw or we'll bankrupt your whole state.
That threat is literally gone.
Had you not "seen" any of that on billionaire owned media?
To them the dnc doing what they do to tip the scales in the open rather than completely behind the scenes is proof they won't...
It's crazy to me honestly.
Especially with all the shenanigans that have happened since the new chair took over to fuck over progressives. But sure totally will be different this time
The DNC will back whoever THEY want as their candidate and they will do everything on their power to make sure everyone else falls in line. And they will use the same tropes they've always used about 'most important election of our lifetime™' and every liberal voter will fall on line