this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
32 points (97.1% liked)

Saskatchewan

384 readers
4 users here now

A community for Saskatchewan

Related communities:

Other provincial communities:

Image Credits:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So today I wrote a bunch of emails to different agencies and my MLA’s office to try and get Saskatchewan politicians off of Twitter, BlueSky, and YouTube in place of Mastadon and PeerTube.

Edit: I got an email back from the conflict of interest commissioner saying they do not have the ability to do anything, unless it is brought forward in the legislature, I am considering forwarding this off to my MLA’s office. I sent different letters off to different agencies but they look a lot the same. I had another edit written for another activism project I am working on with the Federal government, similar to this one. I have 3 going on at once, even for a very active activist I think 3 is a little much. Two is probably to many at one time but hey I did not know until I tried.

Address City, province postal code Your email Date

Dear Commissioner,

I am writing as a concerned Saskatchewan resident regarding the use of US-owned social media platforms, specifically X, BlueSky, and YouTube, by elected officials for public and official communication. 

Recent reports indicate that X has been using artificial intelligence to generate child sexual abuse material and other forms of illegal pornography. BlueSky, on the other hand, has been selling user data to US-based data brokers. The continued use of these platforms by politicians raises serious ethical, reputational, and governance concerns for Saskatchewan officials and the institutions they represent.

When politicians maintain accounts on these platforms, citizens who interact with them may have their personal information collected, processed, and stored outside of Canada, exposing them to foreign jurisdiction and creating risks to public trust. The continued use of X by some Saskatchewan politicians raises particular ethical and data‑sovereignty risks. I recommend that these accounts be removed and that all politicians evaluate their social media policies to ensure alignment with Canadian standards for responsible governance and ethical conduct.

Similarly, politicians should consider moving away from YouTube and other US-hosted platforms and explore Canadian alternatives, including the possibility of establishing Saskatchewan-based Mastodon, Lemmy, and PeerTube servers to host social media and video content locally and securely.

I respectfully request that your office review the ethical and governance implications of elected officials using US-owned social media platforms and provide guidance or recommendations to ensure politicians’ practices reflect responsible, ethical, and transparent communication standards.

Encouraging the use of Canadian-hosted, open-source platforms would reduce reliance on foreign services, improve public trust, and strengthen the ethical standards of government communications.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I would appreciate any guidance or action your office can provide.

Sincerely, Reann Legge I use the pronouns she/her

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Props for this effort! I think what really needs to happen is a law needs to be passed stating that the government should always consider open standards/platforms first – as a basic principle. Because a very generically written law like this would then apply to all the relevant cases both now and in the future.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I am currently doing a few different activism things maybe that should be an other I pick up! Ideal hands and all.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yes please! Honestly I think a great weakness of the current body of law in many countries is that a many laws are written overly specifically, which inevitably means there will be loopholes. If legislators started by defining basic, broadly applicable principles (eg. heuristics for determining the balance between protecting the environment vs helping the economy), it could eliminate the need for many existing laws, and ones that would be kept would just be adding scenario-related specifics.

For example, penal codes: currently they're essentially a lookup table that says Crime -> Sentence (years). But where did those year amounts come from? If instead of having a hard-coded table of imprisonment lengths, the law contained the principle that was used to decide those lengths, the whole table could be eliminated, and you wouldn't need to update the table (ie. wait for lazy MPs) if attitudes in society shifted (leading to a gradual change rather than a sudden jump caused by changing the values in the law). Common law systems like the one you have in Canada are particularly good at dealing woth ambiguously/generically written laws like the ones I propose.

Edit: Just thought of another one— fines for crimes being percentages instead of fixed sums. That's another broad principle that should be passed as generically as I just wrote it. Because then you don't need to ament 000s of laws. And any new by-law that a random, unknowing city council passes will automatically implement this generic principle, without them having to remember the benefits of percentual fines and hence without them having to actively remember to write it in.

Edit 2: Now that I think of it, I might try to email a law professor somewhere to ask them why it hasn't been done like this thus far

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

It has not been done like that because of how are system works and how it was founded, we can change it but pushing the bolder up hill with all the establishment designed to keep that bolder down is hard. I write letters complaining about things and trying to change things, I now currently have 3 projects going to push that bolder up the hill 4 if you count my many pleas to my MP to cross the floor. I would not count it but over all the times I have tried pushing that bolder I know that 3 may be a little much for me to take on, but hey I am going to keep working at it.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Thank you! Maybe paste a boilerplate text sample so we can all copy and paste that message and send it on. I would go to the fed and provincial government websites to get mail or email information. Or the party sites and the MP/MLA's directly.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Citizens must chant "Get off Twitter! Use canadian Mastodon instead!"

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Chicken & egg problem. They won't move until there's a MUCH larger percentage of people using (& preferring) said alternatives as well.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Yes but I am reaching out to privacy agencies, I am going to try and push them that way. I am going to hatch that egg or shake an egg out of a chicken.

Once the government is off of X, or BlueSky the media will be forced to follow. Showing people other options is the way.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago