this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
128 points (96.4% liked)

SneerClub

1243 readers
6 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 50 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] lagrangeinterpolator@awful.systems 23 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

“California is, I believe, the only state to give health insurance to people who come into the country illegally,” Kauffman said nervously. “I think we probably should not be providing that.”

“So you’d rather everyone just be sick, and get everyone else sick?” another reporter asked.

“That’s not what I’m saying,” said Kauffman.

“Isn’t that effectively what happens?” the reporter countered. “They don’t have access to health care and they just have to get sick, right?”

Kauffman contemplated that one for a moment. “Then they have to just get sick,” he said. “I mean, it’s unfortunate, but I think that it’s sort of impossible to have both liberal immigration laws and generous government benefits.”

Do I need to comment on this one?

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

one thing that's so funny to me about this is that of course you're not supposed to say "we're going to brutalize poor people so billionaires don't have to pay more tax." you're supposed to say a rising tide lifts all boats, that kind of thing, and in fact there's a pic in the article where he's holding a sign about how a bigger pie means bigger slices or something to that effect. but as soon as he opens his mouth he just throws "we're going to take the healthcare" out there, because he has no self awareness, no critical thinking, no understanding of what in fact he is trying to do

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This passage from the above-linked lw post from the "stone age billionaire" guy about how counter-protestors tried to prevent them from speaking is really telling:

Then my friend Ben realized that this is a giant game of “I’m not touching you” for adults. Which is the stupidest dang thing IMO, but is pretty symetrical. A few of us just stood close together in a line, and we moved the speeches to the other side of that line. The counter-protestors would have to walk through us to block that speech, and we just didn’t move. When they tried to go around us we shifted to be in front of them. And they couldn’t actually touch us because that was against the rules, so this worked?

I thought we all understood at this point that baiting your enemies into violence was one of the operating principles behind a lot of protests like this. Maybe not as a primary goal (unless you're the Westboro Bastard Church trying to get ammunition for lawsuits against the host city for failing to adequately protect you from the consequences of your own actions) but historically speaking violent repression isn't exactly a failure state for these events. One of the biggest victories for civil disobedience was putting the violent absurdity of segregation on full display by getting massive crackdowns on them for sitting in a restaurant, for example. Making the implicit violence of injustice explicit changes the emotional valence and makes it harder for John Q Public to justify actively supporting it. If you don't have enough mass support to implicitly threaten to do something (i.e. look at all these people who will cause problems if not recognized) then arguably being repressed is an even more significant goal because showing that "about two-dozen kooks believe something" isn't exactly going to mobilize social change on its own and it's not like billionaires care about solidarity with the hoi polloi.

But considering the absolute bafflement on display about counterprotests being willing to rudely inconvenience them it really feels like they understood that sometimes people who believe things will do this thing called a "protest" where they get together and chant slogans and wave signs and have a grand old time, but had no coherent idea of why and never really thought to ask.

[–] maol@awful.systems 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The problem for them is that the cops are actually the army of the rich and state and national government is controlled by billionaire lickers. They could go to DSA meetings and picket, but at best they could get a DSA member to be rude to them and then complain about it.

[–] maol@awful.systems 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

These people are convinced it's the poorest that are getting a free lunch.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"The Poor get ALL the breaks! It's not fair to Billionaires!"

[–] ebu@awful.systems 6 points 3 weeks ago

i can't believe the media is straw manning me. but actually now that you've said the horrible things i don't wanna say out loud that sounds good actually, let's do that

[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 13 points 3 weeks ago

Also a rapist per allegations on twitter.

[–] lurker@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago

with the current state of billionaires that was to be expected

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

Major "pick me" energy in that first photo.

[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 41 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The tip your landlord sign has to be satirical right? ...right?

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For my own sanity I’m going to believe it is

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 17 points 3 weeks ago

March for Billionaires @marchforbillionaires.org · 9h About two dozen people joined the march. Plus some obvious trolls with colored signs who counterprotested. February 8, 2026 at 9:32 AM

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

Silly world

[–] lurker@awful.systems 15 points 3 weeks ago

they actually meant "tip your landlord into the nearest garbage bin"

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Man, not even enough marchers for me to post the Arrested Development photo of Tobias Funke proclaiming, "There are dozens of us! Dozens!"

Thank god

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"There are dozens of us! Dozens (fractional)!"

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And when our descendants build a museum to these bizarre and painful times, there will be docents of them. Docents!

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago

i thought that the whole ruling principle of the effective altruists is primum non docere

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

30 rationalists gathered outside and nobody told them to touch grass

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago
[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 19 points 3 weeks ago

Her shirt describes her perception of reality

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 17 points 3 weeks ago

"billionaires build prosperity" even has the causal arrow wrong. Bezos didn't start amazon as a billionaire for example.

[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 16 points 3 weeks ago

Only property. Water, however, isn’t a human right. Right Nestle?

[–] lurker@awful.systems 15 points 3 weeks ago

bootlicking billionaires when they're the main ones supporting the thing you say is an existential threat is definitely a choice. rationalists seem to be getting more and more mask off in the face of the trump administration

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

been mulling about these fuckers over the weekend and it’s absolutely wild how far they are wilful participants. self-identified chosen fuckwits, even if a number of them are (or at least, start out as) weaponised useful idiots

incredibly frustrating

[–] istewart@awful.systems 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I think their brains have just been thoroughly microwaved by social media feedback loops. I remarked elsewhere that I'm not sure these people are or can be earnest about this (cf. the fact that the billionaires they're celebrating are laser-focused on the tech they claim might doom the world); they're simply too conditioned towards creating outrage content for Twitter. To me, this is more akin to LARPing "Leave Britney alone!" than it is serious political activism.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

To me, this is more akin to LARPing “Leave Britney alone!” than it is serious political activism.

I will be 0% surprised to learn that aella et co got paid 5+ figures for this shit

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Do you reckon it was a net negaive for them? It's heartening (to me) that it was such a damp squib, and it's always entertaining to witness the civillians' reaction to their first taste of TPOT.

Seeing these dingdongs in the sunlight helps observers get over the "It cant be that stupid" barrier, in my experience.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 3 weeks ago

I don't have enough of a handle on current on-the-ground social dynamics of the bay area so I can't guess about net negative, but other than that I agree with your take

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But maybe a billionaire will notice them, and be pleased. That makes it all worthwhile.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh the reference is to that Aella. With the gnomes and LSD.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[–] istewart@awful.systems 5 points 3 weeks ago
[–] maol@awful.systems 10 points 3 weeks ago

Aella's dumb fucking sign pisses me off. No shit the 1% pay lots of taxes, they have a lot of money!

[–] BioMan@awful.systems 9 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)
[–] lurker@awful.systems 13 points 2 weeks ago

"It’s horrifying to see normal people you dance with turn into nazis so easily."

..you're calling the people who hate the billionaires nazis? have you seen what the average billionaire has gotten up to recently???

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 8 points 2 weeks ago

so many temporarily embarassed millionaires there, with the clarity of mind and purpose of a precocious seven-year-old.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

strong echoes of the (probably fictional) reddit tale of the anarcho-capitalist who gets beaten up by real anarchists in Greece.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nice to see the top comment being about how such excess concentration of wealth is kind of bullshit actually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry phone picture and tangent but wow I sure regret digging and looking at this man's horrible blog and his horrible commenters

load more comments (1 replies)

Lol protest in Pac Heights.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

Those are all the same post, just on different bsky instances.

load more comments
view more: next ›