this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
71 points (100.0% liked)

Television

3590 readers
64 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mniot@programming.dev 22 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I enjoyed watching the X-Files as a teenager, but I keep wondering if it wasn't responsible for a bunch of current-day brain-poisoning.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It was only a product of the zeitgeist. This was the era of Unsolved Mysteries jumbling missing-person cold cases with urban legends. All the wild shit referenced in Deus Ex was presented as though it should be taken seriously. Plus UFOs, crop circles, cryptids... what sticks out in my mind was a segment about footage of a cave entrance, and freeze-frames of 'snake-like flying insects unknown to science.' It was a long exposure of a moth. The camcorder's light was on and its shutter angle was wide open. My dad said as much, at the time, and I could not figure out how to square that with the serious tone of the program. If it was that simple, why would they go on television and lie about it?

I think American culture used to be much more credulous toward paranormal bullshit. Uri Gellar and whatnot. Psychic powers, telekinesis, dowsing rods... Miss Cleo. Religious cranks doing their think-of-the-children routine about Ouija boards and crystal energy as if the woo-woo nonsense might work. There's still a quarter of the population that's gullible as shit, but now they're fixated on right-wing propaganda specifically. They're antivax climate denialists, not free-form cranks who think the moon landing was fake and wrestling is real.

All of that contrarian energy has been co-opted by fascists.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think American culture used to be much more credulous toward paranormal bullshit. Uri Gellar and whatnot. Psychic powers, telekinesis, dowsing rods... Miss Cleo. Religious cranks doing their think-of-the-children routine about Ouija boards and crystal energy as if the woo-woo nonsense might work.

In the 1970s people were convinced there would be scientific confirmation of psychic powers.

When I read The Exorcist book the old priest is trying to figure out if the girl is really possessed or if she's just 'using the psychic powers all teenagers are able to demonstrate to a degree'.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-most-believe-in-psychic-phenomena/

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

That's a fair distinction. Later printings of Asimov's "Childhood's End" begin with an apology, because even he thought an infectious hivemind was merely speculative fiction.

Nonetheless: it's unlike bigfoot and UFOs, where only the proliferation of cameras made "I seent it!" grossly insufficient evidence. This was always kind of stupid. People bought it based on vibes, took it quite seriously for some damn reason, and apparently clung to it through the turn of the millennium. Psychic nonsense in particular coincides with the popularity of stage magic, hypnotism, and seances - all supposedly distinguished as demonstrable events within a rationalist worldview. They were gently legitimized by Zener cards and spirit phones, which were vague enough to bicker about, instead of being an obvious hoax like the Cottingley Fairies.

Meanwhile, young-earth creationists remain convinced science will vindicate them. Any day now.

I still feel like, if ChatGPT was a thing in the 90s, there'd be people convinced the government secretly had fully sentient superintelligences they kept to themselves. It would be a constant undercurrent referenced on talk radio and seeping into public discourse. Really, 9/11 conspiracy theories might've been the final peak for such amorphous claims. Even COVID denialism was just "nuh uh" followed by wishful thinking. Idiots chugged horse dewormer and mumbled about laboratories, but any grand wackadoodle narratives were confined to political cartoons that read like parody. Both cases were surely tempered by the fact a lot of people died. You can freely yap about bigfoot at the local dive bar. You could start a screaming row by suggesting anything happened besides what the entire country watched in real-time.

[–] darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Weirdly enough, it was family viewing in my household. We just treated it like any other decent sci-fi show and didn't take it that seriously. That was a common experience for friends as well but it's too small a sample size to say one way or another about possible real-world consequences.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

We watched a lot of CSI over dinner. It is weird how well we separate fiction, especially in a social context. The more modern expression is how scary games don't work if there's someone on the couch beside you.

[–] runsmooth@kopitalk.net 4 points 2 days ago

I always thought it was a bit like Goosebumps, but science fiction.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

it's not just xfiles, i think TV/hollywood in general does that.

[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 14 points 2 days ago

This show needs a modern version with writers who talk to each other and don't make standalone episodes with Scully forgetting everything she experienced in the episodes before.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't doubt the stories will be good, but please be picky with casting. So much of what made it work the first go around was the chemistry between characters and their arcs.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Gilligan seems to have a good track record of casting, so I’m optimistic he’ll get the right actors for the job.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Please be good.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

from fan to fan-written script used in an episode to now helping it return. what a run! bravo vince

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Bravo Vince 👏

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago

I hope it's like early to mid series X-Files and not like latter seasons where they replaced Mulder with Dogget.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

as much as I hate reboots I can see this. being a show that is mostly about individual stories it should go fine as long as they don't totally try to ape the original. Likely best for it to be like a new person finding the xfiles or such.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[–] etherphon@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Oh hell yes, something to look forward to.