this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
425 points (96.7% liked)

196

5751 readers
1484 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sheetzoos@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago
[–] minamoog@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

don't think this is how bell curves work

[–] pringus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

ad blockers are necessary to effectively navigate the internet

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago

fandom.com is bad WITH an adblocker, i would never consider opening it without one

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

anyone who would seriously think using adblock is unethical is a bootlick

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 14 hours ago

They certainly are. I met one of those people in the middle, and they also had interesting opinions on other things like immigration and women's sports...

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm old enough to remember when the internet managed to end banner ads, popup ads, and flashing ads....

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I remember it before ads...

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Never met the person in the middle. Those would be in the 1%

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

who are these people in the middle

i do not recognize them

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 14 hours ago

Largely bootlickers and trolls, they don't exist in as great of numbers as the OP's post implies. The ones on the left are far FAR more common.

[–] attero@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 22 hours ago

Adblock is digital self defense against malware for your pc, as well as your mind.

https://xcancel.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/1569083806224715776

[–] LordPassionFruit@lemmy.ca 129 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Let's say I go to an Invasion Day rally where thousands of people are protesting against the current date of Australia Day because it celebrates colonialism. I bring with Me a stack of flyers about the pro-Palestine rally in two weeks. I hand them out to protesters and say "There's more colonialism happening right now in Palestine. Come to this protest too."

  1. Am I advertising?
  2. Is it ethical?
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'd say it's not inherently unethical. How else would you find out about options for a thing you need?

How current the ad industry works however, can die in a fire.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Consent is a key factor.

If you mail me an ad? Fuck you.

If I search out your service and find you? Okay. Though people game this system obviously. Google used to fight back against this but now they don’t care and even have just given in, allowing pay to play. So fuck that too

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 12 hours ago

I think an even more important aspect to me is something I don't have a good term for, but something like honesty/intrusiveness. The key issue is that advertisement should be an honest, truthful, non-deceitful representation of a good/service. But instead ads are designed to catch your eye, insert themselves into your thoughts with catchy music, play on your emotions even using kids, all while avoiding really telling you what they're about.

On the note of consent, it reminds me of a certain website for webnovels, which hosts ads submitted by users, for their own novels. It's been kind of ruined by GenAI, but it feels very different when the ads are often badly made memes about the premise of the story, since that's what you're already on the site for and it's the actual authors wanting to share their stories.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 points 15 hours ago

it's inherently unethical to me because these companies have decided without my consent that they're entitled to my attention

[–] TheYojimbo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You can just search for it, you don't need ads for that. Ads is a really bad way to find out about options, because it's never about quality, it's all about appearance.

[–] modcolocko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

making an item accessible to being searched for is a form of advertising

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

How would you know what to search for? Some advertising is fine - a sign for a restaurant or industry mailers or magazines, "related products", etc etc are all very tame forms of advertising. The problem is hyperintrusive advertising which has now spiraled so far into hell that it drives a model of data harvesting and content slop that's slowly tainting all access to information we have.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (13 children)

How would you know what to search for?

Because of the needs I have, when I am hungry ill search for recipes or restaurants. When my apartment needs cleaning ill search for cleaning supplies, when I am bored ill look up what movies are playing.

I actually can not come up with a single situation where advertisement would be needed or helpful in anyway. I also do not have a problem with smaller advertisement, but in my dreams they are all banned regardless. Won't be missing those.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LordPassionFruit@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

I walk to the store, I check what's there, I ask an employee for help, then make my own decision. If it's shit, I don't get it again and tell who I know to avoid it. I don't get products that people I trust have had bas experiences with.

Advertisements are lying. Every dollar spent on marketing is a dollar that could have been spent either improving your product or paying your staff. If you advertise to me, I will actively avoid your product.

So you look for items in blank white cardboard boxes that only have a technical definition of the item contained inside?

Logos and packaging are advertising the product inside. Your friends recommending you a product is advertising that product. A company having a website is advertising. The grocery store advertising that an item is on sale is...advertising. It's all advertising.

What we actually hate is intrusive and malicious advertising as well as false advertising. Like billboards. Fuck billboards.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I habe been at all three of these stages in my life, so this seems pretty accurate

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

i'm quite curious about your "adblock unethical" phase because... the fuck?

[–] Redacted@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

The only argument ive seen with any weight is for content creators whose revenue stream is ad dependent, and even then sorry not sorry im not turning off ublock

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

Seriously, the fuck? In what world is it unethical to opt out of having trash thrown in my face?

[–] morto@piefed.social 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Some local news sites in my city show local ads that are simply static images loaded in their pages, mimicking traditional newspaper ads, without any kind of tracking. Although it's questionable at a philosophical level if ads can be ethical, I can live with it, and that method will pass automated adblockers, so it's a win-win.

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 4 points 18 hours ago

I think the biggest issue with personalised ads is that they can exploit weaknesses in people are prevent public discourse about themselves (since they're different for everyone), which is especially bad for political ads. So these ads that you're describing seem good in my book.

[–] CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know, I think I’d be okay with that. As long as it’s not something that’s begging for your attention or trying to get you to click on it.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or loading at random intervals so you have to scroll around to find where you were before the page jumped around. Very little infuriates me more.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I could almost live with ads if they were static, but the typical article-reading experience without afblock goes like this:

See the first paragraph. Start reading. An autoplay video pops in at the top of the page obscuring the view. You scroll down but it's pinned to the top of the viewport. You close it with the miniscule x button. You finish the first paragraph and scroll down past a huge ad to the next paragraph. A banner ad appears at the bottom of the page. You dismiss it with the x. You start reading and two seconds later the banner you dismissed reappears with a new ad, obscuring the content again. You try to dismiss it, but miss and open the ad. Press back in the browser and start again from step 1.

Its exhausting, and it's so painfully constrained, like trying to view a webpage by peeking at it through someone's letterbox.

The Internet with ads, as it stands, is not worth seeing.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

Not to mention it greatly lowered the quality of content. Now it's 95% getting a catchy clickbate title with the actual body often not even agreeing with the title. It's fucking exhausting.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 50 points 1 day ago

Ads are violence on the mind.
Adblocking is good security.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Old bit of computer lying around? Adguard DNS baby

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@piefed.zip 12 points 1 day ago

Adblockers came up in conversation with a (non-techie) friend the other day and they said they don't have one because they are afraid they'd "get the wrong one" or end up with a virus trying to download "something like that" because they've had trouble with those shady download websites that have a ton of fake download buttons... Like, they look at adblocker as if it is the most scandalous form of piracy or something.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Ad networks are known to be a large distributor of malware and scams. 

it’s prudent to block ads. 

load more comments
view more: next ›