this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
39 points (67.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

40694 readers
1243 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 88 points 2 days ago (1 children)

men and females

🙄🙄🙄

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

~~men & women~~
~~males & females~~
men & females

It does feel kinda weird, right?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk what this comment means but yeah, that’s the point of the original comment. Neckbeards who call women “females” are weird

[–] orphigle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's wrong with calling men males and women females?

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literally nothing. If anyone thinks using the terms male and female together is wrong then they are an idiot.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Read this whole thread. No one in this thread is saying man and female is normal. They are saying male and female is.

Can you articulate what’s wrong with using the terms male and female? Or are you more of a braindead, one word comment kind of guy?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Really? You read the whole thread?

Talk about brain dead lol. Maybe you’re missing the tip level comment?

Excited to find out what super generic insult you have lined up as a comeback to this once you see that comment :)

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca -2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Please point out what comment contradicts what I said. I’ll wait.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

https://piefed.blahaj.zone/comment/3437757

I assume you’re trolling at this point if you’re pretending that you can’t scroll up in a thread lol.

Also, dude… “I’ll wait”?

Please try tactics that aren’t out of the Kindergarten version of “how to be an asshole online”

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I guess I’ll hold your hand while we get there together.

Do you understand what that comment is saying?

Dude is rolling his eyes at someone using the term man and female. Expressing his disdain for someone using terms man then female.

So again I ask, where exactly is anyone saying this is ok?

I’ll wait.

P.S. quit complaining about me being an asshole. You can’t be an ass to someone, and then get upset when they are an ass back.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It objectifies women

You could say men and women or you could say male and female. Just don't mix them together.

[–] orphigle@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It objectifies women

By what logic?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 18 hours ago

That's not a helpful answer.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know I really doubt this.

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, i'd say it was only true "at one time, for some people." e.g the upper class in 1800s britain and america.


I think the historical norm can be derived as follows:

Long ago, say medieval times, people probably took off their clothes more often and nudity was more common. People bathed in rivers in public in those days, they needed to work in water sometimes (hence would show knees from hoisting up clothes) and probably chose to take their thick clothes off during sunny harvest days.

Historic accounts actually say that women would go shirtless, i.e boobs literally out, to relieve from heat during outdoor labour - this was the case in some parts of japan in the very early 1900s and some parts of Britain in 1800s. In Japan towns women went fishing together, in britain it would have been farming groups if i remember correctly.

The exception to this historical reality is localised to industrial-era elite, who preferred to button up tightly and show absolutely no skin (except for face). I suppose it might also be the case for men living in countries where burqas and headscarves are the norm for women, but those countries are still the same way today.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 days ago

At one time, a man seeing a female fully naked was the equivalent of a man seeing a female today too... because, you know, everyone was fully naked all the time, clothes hadn't been invented yet...

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 22 points 2 days ago
[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The knees? Are you high? The ankles.

[–] GalacticPanther@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am so pissed I missed her OnlyFans. This was hilarious 💖😂

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not even that. It's a myth. Most skirts were short enough to show the ankles because nobody wanted a muddy skirt.

I appreciate your well actually here. I would just like to point out for future reference that any comment containing the question "are you high?" like that is most likely tongue in cheek.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

The ankles? Looks nervously in the rough direction of the middle east You mean her face?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

Some countries still don't allow women to show their faces because its "indecent exposure" morality laws or whatever 🤦‍♂️

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, we all know that women are just...completely covered in skin, right? They've got it all over them.

[–] DoubleDongle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've got an even bigger secret: Men are too

In men it's the third layer down under hair and grease.

[–] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 day ago

You know what's crazy? So are intersex people!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, because people are wired to like boobs.

Not just people, mammals in general

If you don't like boobs, you might starve to death as a baby. So loving boobs is probably one of the most selected for traits for any mammal.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I lived in Haiti for three years. Breasts weren't considered private. After 2 months, I didn't even notice them. Interestingly, once I came back to Canada, they reverted back to being sexualized.

[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting !

Reminds me of the Islamic concept of the Aura, which basically denotes body parts that should be covered in public. There's the so-called greater and the so-called lesser Aura. The greater Aura (= the body parts for which you commit a greater sin should you uncover yours in public or look at someone else's), goes from the navel to the knees. Thus, for a Muslim woman, it is less of a sin to go topless (as long as her pants cover all the way up to the navel) as it is to run around in a miniskirt or shorts.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Interesting. It would sure attract the tourists.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Related: I wonder if "Daddy" is sexualized in places like say Singapore or Hong Kong...

I see "Daddy" used in TVB Shows... 👀

@NorthWestWind@lemmy.world So I hereby summon thee, our resident Hong Konger; is there like a sexualization of "Daddy" like there is in western countries?

Or do y'all just use the Cantonese word?

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Daddy is used normally here. I can't think of a Cantonese equivalent off my head right now, but we have plenty of phrases describing different relationships types.

For example, 食軟飯 (eat soft rice) means a man being financially dependent on a woman.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And seeing her breast was like seeing an MRI.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Okay Eric Rohmer