this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
661 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

20505 readers
1740 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple were told they faced a $200,000 (£146,500) medical bill when their baby was born prematurely in the US, despite them having travel insurance which covered her pregnancy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 35 minutes ago

US health insurance pulled the same shitty tactic on me with my first born.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 12 minutes ago

Only $200k? They got a deal there.

That's one expensive citizenship

[–] bassgirl09@lemmy.world 24 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Ah yes, the United States -- Don't get sick or you will have to fight tooth and nail to get your insurance company to pay for necessary medical care. This is a story heard over and over again stateside. If the U.S. was truly the best place in the world to live, this would simply not happen. As a person who has worked in healthcare in the U.S. for over 15 years, I feel this in my bones. I am glad you could get legal help and have the right outcome based on what you paid for. I would love nothing more than to see everyone who comes to the U.S. receive medical care appropriately -- Nobody asks to get sick :(

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 3 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago) (1 children)

i'm glad the medical side tries to stay focused on patient care. i've a friend in Mexico where they check ability to pay before any treatment begins. she was bleeding out and they waited until after her card was verified before doing anything. lower costs, maybe. One thing that being married to an RN has taught me, the billing department sends insanely inflated bills which are step 1 in their insurance negotiation. I got a bill for over $600,000, I laughed while still in the hospital bed. bill got negotiated down to $150,000. Even if there is a ginormous bill, you can postpone threatened collections by sending them anything, like $10/month. it will reset their billing escalation cycle. debts more than 7 years old will get written off. if all else fails, bankruptcy isn't all that bad. shuffle assets to trusted family. the amount of money they waste on greedy negotiations far eclipses any actual cost for treatment. don't stress over the bills. stress kills. let some fat lawyer worry about not getting a new car this year.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 4 points 30 minutes ago

I dunno - my ex burned all the skin off his hand once, the first question at the emergency room was "how are you paying?" and we waited there 5 hours before they saw him, during which time it got so much worse he ended up needing more treatment & therapy. No we didn't have insurance or money back then. They eventually arranged temporary Medicaid for him as he couldn't work with the hand so burned. Which left us without his income (I had just given birth too) so without much food.

Anyway - this was in the 1990s but I am absolutely sure we had to wait because we could not pay, even though it was an obvious emergency.

[–] jago@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Not germane. Zurich Insurance Group is not a USian medical insurance company.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Just a stark reminder that all insurance, no matter where you get it from and what country it originates in, is 100% a scam.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 6 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

That's just blatantly false. I'm all for hating companies that gouge people to make money, but insurance isn't inherently a scam. Insurance, when implemented properly, is paying a low regular premium to offset a risk you can't afford should it hit. I've insured my house against burning down, because I can afford to pay a small amount once a month while a fire (while unlikely) would bankrupt me. Most likely, I'll lose money in the long run by paying for that insurance, but that's not the point. The point is that I can afford to lose money over a 30-50 year period, but I cannot afford to lose my house at any single point during the next 30-50 years.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 2 points 22 minutes ago

i'll bet you and all your neighbors 100/mo, your house won't burn down this month. send payments on time or else. Meanwhile, i lend you your money to pay for your mortgage with interest. have some more Kool-Aid.

[–] bassgirl09@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I am well aware of that. This couple's experience was in parallel to what occurs all the time with people who have insurance in the U.S.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

How's the US still a country, how do people just put up with it.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 minutes ago

Bread and circuses still works.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Around 50 years of near constant propaganda from our media convincing people that the government paying for anything is destructive to the economy and that taxing rich people more that poor people is not fair.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StraponStratos 45 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Not trying to victim blame but do not go to America.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bampop@lemmy.world 63 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

After a nine month legal battle, Zurich has reversed its decision and told the BBC it was sorry for the stress caused.

Yeah, very sorry I'm sure. Oopsie, we accidentally fought a nine month legal battle to avoid paying out the exact thing the insurance is for

[–] awfulawful@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 26 minutes ago

Arguing the care wasn't covered because the baby wasn't named in the insurance despite explicitly covering pregnancy-related care is ghoulish behavior. I can't fathom how you can argue that seriously and not feel like a piece of shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›