this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
156 points (95.9% liked)

Uplifting News

18258 readers
207 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fta@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

Honestly, the study is so well written you don’t need to read the article:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(25)00397-9/fulltext But glad the article spread the news.

The most reported adverse event (n=7) was COVID-19.

They’re required to report it, but so funny.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

♪♪♪ "I know the pieces fit, cause I watch them falling down" ♪♪♪

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What about tetris on mushrooms?

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago

Not only do you cure your PTSD but you can cure others with your serene wisdom

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wow:

After just one month, researchers found a stark reduction in intrusive memories, commonly known as flashbacks, for those using the Tetris-based treatment – ten times fewer than either control group. It remained highly effective after six months, with 70% of participants who received it reporting no intrusive memories at all, even alleviating other PTSD symptoms.

That's a crazy positive result. Hopefully there is more research into this treatment. My wife still has PTSD and other early childhood trauma related issues that are being treated with NMDR, which is definitely effective, but it sounds like this could potentially accentuate that treatment for a more positive outcome.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Have you ever heard of EMDR therapy? This really reminds me of this. It's a newer therapy that is geared towards trauma. They do this weird thing where they have the participants move their eyes back and forth while thinking of their trauma. People seem to be torn on whether or not the eye movements themselves help or if it's just the nature of performing an action while doing so. Kind of sounds like a similar concept to me.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Whoops, that's exactly what I meant to say, I accidentally typo'd it to NMDR. Yeah, EMDR is an interesting thing that I'm not sure how it works, I just know anecdotally that it works for my wife.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Wow no I'm dumb I somehow skipped that part of the sentence sorry!!!

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's too good, and its funded by a corporation, and its got a very low sample size, and it's tied in with some wacky "digital therapy solution". I wouldn't be surprised if the control groups actually worsened because the service just sucked and the tetris version included less of that service.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am also treating this one limited study with a huge grain of salt, but I'm an eternal optimist so I hope my pessimism is wrong.

[–] Aatube@thriv.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it's not too limited just to assess general efficacy either

[–] Aatube@thriv.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll copy my reply from below as well:

how would it possibly be bad in factors other than efficacy, like BetterHelp was due to data nightmares and advertising a different mechanism? this isn't even online

99 is a more than enough sample size as this RCT's Bayes factor is 114 and 15.8 for better efficacy than -control and -regular treatment respectively, which corresponds to "extreme" and "strong evidence" (Lee and Wagenmakers 2013, p. 105; adjusted from Jeffreys, 1961). The Lancet also peer-reviewed the claim "The Bayesian adaptive trial design enabled efficient evaluation with early stopping when convincing evidence was reached (n=99).[2]"

indeed further testing is needed to establish subgroup effects and improve generalizability but this is already quite promising

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck off, dude, you expect me to treat you seriously when you defend a company that commodified mental illness?

[–] Aatube@thriv.social 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

i have never supported or defended BetterHelp

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You said the only bad thing about it was low efficacy. Fuck you.

[–] Aatube@thriv.social 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

that was the opposite of what i meant; sorry i was unclear. when I said "how would it possibly be bad in factors other than efficacy, like BetterHelp was due to data nightmares and advertising a different mechanism" i meant that BetterHelp had many reasons it was bad other than efficacy like data nightmares and advertising a different mechanism, and asked how the tetris treatment would replicate BetterHelp's notorious woes

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just replace traumatic memories with falling bricks. 😃

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 15 points 2 days ago

*patient with PTSD after nearly being crushed by a falling pallet of bricks on a construction site:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH–

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Actually this is effectively how it works.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I'm genuinely shocked at there only being negative comments here. I'm doubtful anyone actually read the article, let alone the study. This is wonderful news and good science, it should be celebrated.

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

The participants in the study must not be playing tetris the grand master.

[–] anakin78z@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Interesting, I feel like I've heard about this 'mental image rotation' exercise before, though I forget in what context. Pretty cool

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/rotating-a-cow-in-mind

I suspect the memes started because research into image rotation got in the news cycle, and the Internet took it from there.