this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
161 points (97.1% liked)

News

36201 readers
2664 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 17 minutes ago

New flash! AI chatbot is not a doctor! More news at 7.

[–] totesmygoat@piefed.ca 29 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I'm sorry. But if you are following chatgpts medical advice... It's the kind of thing that will take care of itself.

[–] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago

It’s not like a user asked vanilla ChatGPT random questions and took the responses for medical advice. This is a service openAI marketed specifically for medical use. If we want to keep up the pretense that consumer protection laws and regulations exist and matter, this is a big deal, and the blame is on the vendor, not on the user.

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they didn't have any other choice.

[–] acantharea@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, a lot of people are short on money to swing a doctor visit and whatever costs that may hold.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This is actually criminal activity, it poses as qualified expert advice, but is nothing but a con, delivering totally unqualified advice.
This can only be categorized as fraudulent, in any lawful society where quackery is illegal.
ChatGPT needs to be investigated, and legal procedures needs to be held against them, with the goal of closing the "service" and huge fines for putting lives at risk.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They'll get sued and will have to prevent it from dispensing medic advice. Honestly I'm surprised they weren't sued already.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Or they get a pass like so many corporations are now. Like self driving cars.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I don't recall Cruise getting a "pass."

[–] pigeonofparadise@lemmy.org 0 points 17 hours ago

They will never be sued. Ever.

[–] MonkeyDumpster@lemmy.org 3 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

am i in an anti-ai bubble or is every ai story that comes out extremely negative?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago

Definitively a bubble. I know pro-AI people irl

Personally I'm more in the "it's not the tool, but how it's used (aka, the rich fucks are the problem, as usual)"

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

Bubble, mostly. I'm sure you can find plenty of pro-ai articles elsewhere.

[–] pigeonofparadise@lemmy.org 0 points 17 hours ago

Go over to Lemmy.ml, the hivemind was super anti-ai last year and now they are collectively pro-ai. Odd shift, but if you want more ai news that’s your best bet for now.