this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
100 points (100.0% liked)

effort

7593 readers
179 users here now

Welcome to c/effort, the home of effort posts! This is a space where you can write on an topic, as long as it reflects real time and effort to put together.

Rules

Posts are text-only. No images or videos.

2.While the topic can be on anything, posts still require “effort”. While there isn’t a minimum word limit or anything, generally this means it’s longer than most other posts and there’s also that the expectation that your posts required real effort to write up.

“Master” posts that have a lot of links are welcomed.

No copypastas

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Saying Americans are too comfortable is just reinforcing US propaganda that the USA is this free capitalist paradise where food and luxury rains from the sky. It ignores the psychological war constantly being waged against the working class in the heart of the empire. Yes they have food, but they're malnourished because it's made of cheap plastic slop. Yes they have circuses but even cavemen had entertainment, that's not a luxury. I can't believe I have to tell leftists that 'but you have iPhone' isn't a sign your life is easy. Especially because half of these 'luxuries' are just tools that:

  1. You can't take part in society without.
  2. Everyone fucking hates them but you're damned if you do, damned if you don't (good luck getting a job and feeding yourself without a phone, car and social capital of being a good consumer).

Ask the people working three jobs just to afford rent if they're comfortable.

Ask the people living in tent cities in they're comfortable.

Ask the young people grimly joking that they're going to die before they retire if they're comfortable.

Ask the people on the kill line who are one medical bill away from being on the street if they're comfortable.

Are there countries where life is harder? Yes, but playing the suffering Olympics ignores the real material conditions that the US (and it's vassals) face and we would be stupid to ignore it. Ignoring mental anguish and the exsaution of being human cattle just because they aren't being physically bombed is downplaying the severity of psychological violence. Telling the single mother burnt out working multiple dead end jobs worried if her kids are going to ever have a home or even a habitable planet that she's too comfortable is fucked and isn't going to create the vanguard.

Nearly every single person I talk to (excluding the owning class) is running on empty. Everyone is sick. Everyone is depressed. Everyone is hopeless. They have seen countless protests amount to nothing. They have seen our rulers commit every single unspeakable crime and go unpunished. They've watched the surveillance state grow and record their every move. They know, they fucking know. But their hope has died. The lack of riots over the Epstein files isn't the inaction of someone who has it too good to care, it's the inaction of a beaten spouse who knows their place.

They're doing nothing because their spirits are broken, not because they're too well fed. From their perspective they're too busy making sure they have the energy to put food on the table to start a revolution.

My point is that downplaying the struggles of the US working class is ignorant, reactionary, and ignores material conditions and therefore is unhelpful in mobilising anyone. I think this rhetoric needs to change if we are to be effective.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrfugu@hexbear.net 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Good post. I just don’t see how we get anywhere by giving anyone outside of the ruling/owning-class immutable and intrinsic morality. People can be evil of course but I think the average person is much more of a dumb sad little baby than most people on this site would lead you to believe. I don’t know how we’d organize a revolution, let alone run functional socialism without extending some trust and grace to our neighbors who have just done the only thing they’ve ever known and have been forced a steady diet of propaganda their entire life.

As mentally exhausting as it is we do maintain a bit of privilege over these masses be it from education, trauma, tism, what have you, we’ve seen the truth about our world and believed it.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 6 points 16 hours ago

dumb sad little baby

babies are curious

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 4 points 15 hours ago

It's more accurate to say that they're afraid of doing things any differently.

To admit that you've been going down the wrong path means giving up on a large part of your life that you've invested in. And on a deep level, the investment outweighs the disaffection.

[–] Arahnya@hexbear.net 19 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I think a major aspect I would critisize the working class and poor in america is the historical and present disconnect that especially white people have regarding Black abolitionist / slave revolts and uprisings, anti-Indigenous sentiments, being anti-trans, generally supporting eugenics and discrimination against disabled people, and covering up / enabling abusers.

I feel that the recent uprisings against the ruling class aren't taken seriously enough in that regard (George Floyd, Ferguson, etc) as a legitimate pathway to revolution, already laid down. Everyone's favorite white abolitionist followed a path already laid down. jb-shining

While the lower classes are suffering, there are also layers to the suffering; for example, I will point to the internalized colonies in the americas, where the people living there are effected by environmental racism and generally have worse living conditions and access to food/medicine/jobs than their poor white counterparts, and are preyed upon and targeted, or their neighborhoods are gentrified.

I am also reminded of when the recent hurricane devastated rural communities and people were happy that the "evil southerners" were being taken out, ignoring the fact that there are people living in poverty there without internet or phones. Some who don't get notified when floods come through town.

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Not intended as a full response but any discussion about this subject really has to reckon with the fact the secured workers do get a little organized in the states they almost without fail support the most bloodthirsty imperialist actions in order to benefit themselves.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Turns out joining a lib union doesn't undo a lifetime of propaganda.

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I don’t think it’s about the effectiveness of the propaganda (which I’m not denying, it’s why the state does it), it’s more about first world workers deriving direct material benefit from imperialism especially when they’re organized enough to demand a larger share of the loot.

For anyone who hasn’t seen it: https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 11 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

I'm gonna be real with you, one of the reasons I can't be bothered to finish that article is because it gets dropped in scenarios like this. I've already gotten into a whole struggle session over venting about it before so we don't need to get into it but, ya'll use it like a thought terminating cliche.

Go watch yourself a copy of Harlan County U.S.A. [Trailer] and you tell me that a modern day union member has even the slightest sliver of Class Consciousness that those folks did. Y'all keep expecting modern day libs to manufacture whole-clothe internationalist concepts out of, not even thin air, but an environment that is purposely designed to be caustic to the concepts. And it's just silly.

[–] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 7 points 16 hours ago

i think it's worth noting that Day is also wildly secterian, which to me kind of detracts from these essays as the hexbear staple that they are

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Internationalist concepts such as “Arabs are people and we shouldn’t steal their shit and destroy their countries.” Yeah, I kinda do.

You don’t wanna engage with the concepts in the article fine but you’re never getting anywhere until you realize mass slaughter in the third world has direct material benefits for white workers in the US especially unionized ones and labor aristocrats.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Internationalist concepts such as “Arabs are people and we shouldn’t steal their shit and destroy their countries.” Yeah, I kinda do.

And that's why I think you and the other folks that drop that link all the time are silly. Because this is the context you're putting it in. And I'm not saying there's no material benefits involved, but most of y'all are not engaging with your own survivorship bias. Everybody but me, as the one true leftist that was decanted out of a vat from Havana, had their own intellectual and ideological hurdles just to get to the point of even being on this website. Which if we're being honest, is still just like a step above rad-liberalism. ~~We~~ I mean, y'all are very fucking lucky just to have reached this level of resisting our environment. But this is certainly not the end point and frankly the context y'all are constantly creating around the article, regardless of its contents, I think would have both fanon and gramsci-heh shining.

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Without going into my own ideological development (which if I’m being honest it’s a miracle I’m not a chud), I think you’re making up a guy to to get mad at.

Two things can be true. 1. It takes a near perfect storm of exposure to information and perspectives, and the right accidental mental state, for a white worker in the US to land anywhere even remotely near communism. 2. White workers in the US, especially organized ones, benefit massively from overseas mass slaughter, and because of that almost without fail support it.

So the only winning move is to shatter imperialism first.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

There's plenty of people on Hexbear for me to get mad at without making anybody up.

Look I don't think #2 is non-existent, but I think it's extremely overblown in lieu of #1 and even moreso when you get down to the rank and file. The general public shift on a dime all the time with whatever the latest Hegemonic narrative is. The same folks who were proudly putting on cloth masks to 'flatten the curve' in 2020 will now tell you masks don't work while researchers are publishing studies comparing Covid to AIDS. And yet despite all that, Social Media organically circumventing Corporate media's presentation of the genocide in Gaza showed a massive shift in support of Palestinians in an extremely short time.

So the only winning move is to shatter imperialism first.

Oh, is that all.

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 1 points 8 hours ago

I guess I don’t really understand thinking it barely exists when every major union in the US has behaved in a way to prove the hypothesis.

Point taken on how nigh insurmountable the task of breaking unilateral capitalist hegemony is. It’s not gonna be any one of group of us that does it, just the system collapsing itself under its own contradictions. Guess the main thing we have to do is try to be ready for when it happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 19 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Something the left here has totally forgotten is the importance of organizing workers as workers (and let me be explicit here and say I mean organizing unions of workers with or without government sanction). Every time there was something even remotely close to a revolution in the US was because proles (or slaves) revolted, almost exclusively organized by unions or in similar formations. Lenin and Marx both saw worker organization and militancy as essential to revolutionary action and history proves time and time again that it's the essential foundation of revolution in the industrialized world. The new left ignored these facts because organizing workers is hard, organizing students was easier, and incorrect readings of Mao and Lenin gave justification to do the latter instead of the former. We've been fucked ever since.

This doesn't mean just organizing workers into government sanctioned collaborationist unions, but even the most reactionary unions develop class consciousness of their members. The fact that there are (supposedly) 100k DSA members and not even one tenth as many salting campaigns says everything that needs to be said about the modern American left. How do we expect to project and wield the power of the proletariat if the proletariat is comically disorganized?

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Atomisation is a huge problem that the left needs to figure out.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 10 points 19 hours ago

i have no irl friends idk how i'm supposed to get anyone in town to mask, and that doesn't take any effort on their part.

[–] SnakeEyes@hexbear.net 12 points 22 hours ago

I agree that a revolution is possible it just won't be white

They ain't the ones getting systemically executed

[–] Sneakytrickyyy@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

"Not since the serfs of ancient Perikarnassis has History produced a more inert social class than the Martinaise proletariat. The rest of Revachol at least pretends to rebuild, these people still live in ruins..."

the-deserter

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Marx thought European proles were going to have a revolution over a century ago because of their material conditions, instead those same proles chose fascism. Lenin's analysis of Imperialism begins to explain why, those imperial core workers are a part of the imperialist machine and by and large they would rather help that machine continue to reap the benefits than try and stop the machine. Workers in Europe a century ago had objectively worse conditions than westerners today and without short form videos and other slop to pacify themselves, and they still chose fascism instead of revolution. After that, the USSR defeated the fascists for the europeans and what did they do? Choose fascism again, and again, and again. It doesn't have to be that those people are living like well fed royalty to choose fascism, the ideological component allows them to live like serfs but still feel like royalty in comparison to the nations they plunder.

This is foundational Marxism-Leninism, revolution doesn't happen in the imperial core, it never has, and it isn't going to. The west will eat itself and the revolutions will happen in the nations they are forced to retreat from. Lying to ourselves that fascists will somehow not be fascist because modern living sucks isn't going to produce a revolutionary analysis which is in line with revolutionary theory and in guidance of revolutionary action.

[–] aqwxcvbnji@hexbear.net 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

proles chose fascism

No, lumpenproletariat and petit-bourgeoisie chose fascism. The proletariat chose social-democrat and communist. At this map which shows where which party was relatively stronger shows that more industrialised regions (like the Ruhr-area) where red, not brown.

This is foundational Marxism-Leninism

No, that's just Settlers, a book which tells Americans that revolution is impossible for them (so don't even try, it's wasted energy!) while using radical rethoric.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

social-democracy is the moderate wing of fascism. by your own numbers, more german "leftists" chose moderate fascism than communism, which puts the two fascist parties at a strong majority of votes at the time. obviously we all know the part SDP played, right?

I've never read Settlers, my analysis is concretely and firmly in the ML tradition. Just because the only revolution Americans are getting is a fascist revolution doesn't mean you shouldn't organize, but trying to organize a worker's revolution means spending your last days before the fascist revolution in a way that does nothing to prepare you for life after the fascist revolution. The only thing to organize now is the sabotage of fascism and the survival of whoever isn't a fascist. The workers revolutions will be happening in the periphery as the US rattles

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed, and I think the major disagreement that i see in this discussion generally (and you and OP are good examples) is twofold.

  1. Talking about labour aristocracy and the treats of empire does not mean that nobody has a hard life in the empire. It's an analysis that the benefits of imperialism will be lost if it's overthrown, and westerners are aware of this. And that's why they often choose fascism as the option to maintain at least that benefit to themselves. It's a real incentive structure which we need to account for in our analyses.

  2. We have to be strategic and tactical, which means throwing this in the face of people occupying both the labor aristocracy class and the proletariat class is not the best idea. At least not in the unstrategic way that some do: "you're a treatlerite and that's why you don't love China." It's just not useful in that way. It must be a pillar of western theory, but with the goal of finding the positive message we can bring forth: "yes, it's a net positive to you in the short term if we let Libyans be enslaved for empire, but you get a much larger benefit of more free time, more meaningful work, and less poverty destroying your towns if we choose the other way". Many forget to say anything like the last part in any tangible, believable way.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yes I agree.

it seems that some people think having the type of analysis I said means you are not trying to organize at all or that you do but you walk up to a stranger and say "hey you fucking traitor to the workers of the world, if you don't join my book club now you'll just be forced to do it later in the reeducation camps."

the reason why having an accurate analysis of these conditions is important is because cadre need correct theory to plan strategy. not understanding this theory is why western leftists say shit like "we need to figure out how to organize rural white workers, they're workers too!" or "we need to elect more socialists and fight to push the democrats left!"

I would guess that a super majority of self identified leftists in the west are legitimately propping up capitalism more than opposing it because they have no real analysis of how to organize and often think that leftists that do are worse than reactionaries.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

We agree entirely! I just think we don't really disagree with dirt owl either, or at least, we wouldn't if we all understood that these perspectives are complementary. In fact, I think dirt owl is making a useful point (don't just go around yelling that the US is labor aristocrats who have no revolutionary position). I just agree that this doesn't mean that the analysis of labor aristocracy is wrong, just the lazy application of it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fascism is also very good at telling a miserable population that its the fault of a minority group. Its much easier to rally people against an enemy that is easily beaten than to convince them to fight an enemy as all encompassing to their lives as capitalism.

Add to that in west you have neoliberals posing as the left choice convincing people that defeating capitalism is a laughable concept and to just settle for the lesser of two evils and you have a paralysed public that can't imagine a better world.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yes this is all why organizing logistics networks and decolonial programs with colonized and oppressed communities is the priority if you live in imperial core. before things get worse, now is the time for relationships and trust building with community leaders, creating medical clinics, food production and distribution networks, education programs, etc. By engaging the masses with their material struggles and providing solutions to their problems, politicization happens in turn

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 39 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The main reason I don't engage in protests near me is that to get to them I have to drive to like an hour to two hours depending on traffic and then pay for parking and I have to pay for gas and then if I actually get arrested at this protest which is a possibility I will have to deal with legal fees not to mention medical fees from getting the shit beaten out of me by the cops. Having a criminal record will make it more difficult to find a job. Any job. Like working the fryolater at McDonald's or wiping shit out of toilets. I already don't make enough money to pay rent anywhere in the state on my income and still feasibly drive to work instead of sleeping in my car.

I am honestly at a loss as to what I could materially do to stop the war machine that leeches off my paycheck when every action I take costs me money which I don't even have enough of to cover my existing medical expenses and vehicle maintenance. When I get home, driving through windy canyon roads with LED headlights blinding me every 30 seconds, I feel too exhausted to do much apart from drown my sorrows in ethanol and THC and video games and YouTube slop.

I feel weak and impotent and morally complicit through inaction but mostly I just feel tired. Spent. Rage burns you out after a while. I watched this government march millions of poor people to their death rather than implement robust pandemic protections, throw children into concentration camps, fully fund a genocide being broadcast to the world in real time, and move heaven and earth to protect a cabal of child molesters. I know I'm fucking overwhelmed and exhausted and I also know a lot of my fellow Americans genuinely do not fucking care about any of this shit and it enrages me even further but I feel lost and alone and what little energy I do have I would prefer to save for protecting my nonbinary partner from all the horrific shit personally affecting them in the midst of this nightmare.

My fondest hope right now is this war humiliates us on the global stage and costs us all of our allies and the machinery of the empire degrades to the point that we're straight up less capable of evil. I don't dare fool myself imagining more might happen.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DwigtRortugal@hexbear.net 31 points 1 day ago

very good post. if you can't go out into the world and talk to people without thinking about how they're all irredeemably evil treatlerites and you tell yourself you only feel that way because of "materialism" (ie you read some internet lenin's essay or watched a youtube) you're not going to organize anything more than that disco elysium communism book club. it's hard work and it's going to take a long time and that sucks, so come here and let off some steam, but if you live in the west, don't just automatically give up on everyone in whatever hellcountry you live in. if you can't find an org, volunteer for something useful and integrate yourself just a little bit into whatever community exists where you are. if that's too much, and all you can do is gently nudge a couple of people in the right (left) direction, you're still doing something real, even if it feels small. even if you're not in a place to do any of that, there's still value in reframing the way you think about these things and maybe eventually getting to the point where you have the capacity to do more. but you can't do that if you're envisioning the person who drives an uber for 6 hours after their wendys shift as an intractable foe drunk off the riches of imperialism.

[–] Salah@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

Whether or not a revolution in the imperial core is possible is not something I dare to comment on. But organising the working class in the imperial core is still possible and necessary because of the reasons you gave. A working class that is well organised on marxist and anti imperialist principles weakens the capitalist class and limits their power overseas.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago

Not American, Australian, but this also applies to US vassals.

Additionally, a lot of the iPhone style tools people have require constant subscriptions and money spent for the "service" so people are nickel and dimed out of every bit of money they earn. They might make a total amount more money than elsewhere in the world but also end up losing the overwhelming majority of that just to afford to continue to exist.

And sometimes these companies just say "fuck you" and screw you over, like my phone bill this year has a 5 times price increase of what it used to be because they just got rid of the plan I was using and there isn't a single phone plan provider that offers anything close to the price I was previously paying. And I can't just not have a phone, because that completely isolates a person socially and professionally.

And that's just one part of this, everything in the west is like this, everything requires you to pay more and more and more and it is mandatory to do so, there's no escape, no chance for a break, any money you make just goes straight into a black hole, you want to help people but don't have the money or the time to do so, because you're barely able to keep yourself afloat.

And you can't organise with people because people are so atomised and hyper-individualised over here that they view mutual aid as a scam half the time and if you mention the scary "S" word, or god forbid, the "C" word, you'll end up with people screaming at you, red in the face with rage, for thinking there is any other option than this.

We aren't comfortable, any luxuries people buy(and you have to buy them! Can't do anything for free over here) are just a form of self-medication, a quick easy distraction from the nonstop pain of existence.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As this is Yankee excuse hour I'll chime in with my analysis of why there isn't much of an antiwar movement (yet):

  1. This was fairly sudden.
  2. The left is maxed out on capacity.

People contrast the absence of antiwar movement now to the much more mobilized anti-war movement in 2003. People also will contrast the absence of any top-down PR campaign to sell the war in Iran to all the stunts the Bush admin did to justify the 2003 Iraq war. My thesis is those are cause and effect. All that campaigning in 2003 essentially gave anti-war movement enough warning to mobilize in response. If the war drags on an anti-war movement should develop. As usual, the more Americans that return in boxes the faster it will develop.

I can't speak for the entirety of the US but in my corner of the US left wing, we just grew rapidly in response to those ICE murders and theres still BDS movements and electoralists planning the next Zorhan. "Caught us in a growth spurt" isn't much of an excuse but there is existing momentum.

To top that off, the anti Iraq war movement did diddly shit to stop the war. You can't publically organize around norfolk electrical substation

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 5 points 19 hours ago

the much more mobilized anti-war movement in 2003.

and that didn't accomplish anything at all. we have no power over foreign policy and I don't think we actually did 50 years ago either when we were at our most powerful in that regard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] splendidsadiks@hexbear.net 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Of course that's harmful to the US left, which pursues "raising awareness", Christisnity-inspired charity, a dead collaborationist union movement, democratic party tailism, rent control, and minimum wage. Pounting out that your comfort isndirectly proportional to concessions frpm your leaders is the very first step of turning towards the real objective.

The current left project is chasing after concessions that went awat with Seinfeld and Friends' popularity and no amount of moralizing will chanhe that.

The currwnt "worker movemrnt" doesn't even account for homeless and declassed people and can only fform "coalitions" by sacrificing recruitment and leverage to the setablishment

You DO live off of stolen labor hoursm Obtaining more is the sgated goal of your movement and no amount of rentier extraction recouping those slperprofits will alter that dynamic it will enforce yournsubservience.

1.) Productive forces

2.) fuckinf dying

which one. which one. which kne.

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I always hated the fixation on raising awareness. My first thought is always "OK, everyone is aware. Now what? Give them the next step!"

[–] miz@hexbear.net 8 points 18 hours ago

my awareness is honestly a little too high, I'm having trouble functioning

[–] splendidsadiks@hexbear.net 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

autism experience with raising awareness is people asking you to rub yourselfnwith sandpaper in public until Things Change also sorru for the edits and potentially agitating tone Inam agitated and toned

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not comfort, but they have something to lose i.e. three jobs is better than no jobs. They're keeping their heads down to preserve what scraps they have, because they know it can all be taken away if they don't behave. It's a very effective system of control.

At least, it's effective as long as there are jobs.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

Plus, everyone is in debt. It makes keeping those jobs even more precious, because otherwise you end up as one of the homeless you pass on the way to work, and then life is even harder as many of our hexbear comrades can attest to. And then if you have a family to take care of it's even worse.

load more comments
view more: next ›