this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
120 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23013 readers
293 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Search your feelings Luke, you know it's true

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] miz@hexbear.net 41 points 2 weeks ago

Li: At the moment, the Chinese the party state has proven an extraordinary ability to change. I mean, I make the joke: “in America you can change the political party, but you can’t change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you can change policies.” So, in the past 66 years, China has been run by one single party. Yet the political changes that have taken place in China in these past 66 years have been wider, and broader, and greater than probably any other major country in modern memory.

Pilger: So in that time China ceased to be communist. Is that what you’re saying?

Li: Well, China is a market economy, and it’s a vibrant market economy. But it is not a capitalist country. Here’s why: there’s no way a group of billionaires could control the Politburo as billionaires control American policy-making. So in China you have a vibrant market economy, but capital does not rise above political authority. Capital does not have enshrined rights. In America, capital — the interests of capital and capital itself — has risen above the American nation. The political authority cannot check the power of capital. That’s why America is a capitalist country, and China is not.

from https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

Reminded me of this article

Socialism had its problems, too

None of this means there were no problems, Grossman said, and he had some of the sharpest criticisms voiced in the interviews on Saturday night.

“They never were able to take well any public criticism of the leadership,” he said. “You could criticize your boss on the job, the way things were set up there, you could criticize delays or bureaucratic glitches. Of course in America, you can criticize the political leaders but watch out if you criticize your boss or the people who run your company.”

https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/ossies-former-east-germans-compare-socialist-youth-with-life-under-capitalism/

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How many voters are required to change a lightbulb?

spoilerZero - voters can't change anything.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you vote for the lesser evil enough times you might get a promise to change the lightbulb, it's better than the alternative amirite

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At some level isn’t a one party state functionally a zero-party state?

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago

America has a 2 party state because they realized the power of the dialectic, and coopted it. The struggle is detached from reality because you can always blame the other party and wait for the pendulum to swing.

When there's only one party, you can't do that and you're forced to acknowledge mistakes and actually fix things

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago