this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
621 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

82581 readers
3527 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That sucks, but how the fuck does Atlassian have 16,000 workers to begin with? What do they all do? And their products look like... Guestures at all of them

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They are the ones in charge of making sure bitbucket stops working every other Thursday.

[–] aarch64@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You've got an extra digit there

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No he doesn't. The redundant 1,600 are only 10% of the workforce. 16,000 total.

[–] aarch64@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

You know what? That makes a lot of sense.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You could save a LOT of money by replacing the execs with AI.

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

You can save even more money by shutting down Atlassian and all its trash products

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sleet01@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Their products are utter garbage to begin with, this can only hasten their well-deserved demise.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Uh, we need you to clear out your desk ASAP."
"Sure, just submit a JIRA ticket and I'll get right on it."

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

It's even worse than that: it'll be a ServiceNow ticket.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI will have a scrum with itself.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, agentic AI going all agile with lobster claws.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Somehow, HR processes are always exempt from the ticketing process.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And yet oddly (and predictably, and likely disastrously, etc. -) some HR departments are among the very first to glibly upload their (our) everything's into constantly shifting unreliable AI "products". Not speaking hypothetically 😐

Funny stuff, that.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because the people who work in HR spent their educational years avoiding anything technical.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Our HR critters use a case-management system, badly. They have an internal process, but never adapted the default workflows to match it. So the pendejitos are always trying to clean up self-inflicted gunshot wounds to their feet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flubba86@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

JIRA and Bitbucket are so bad that even Microsoft Azure DevOps (that is a reskin of the decade old Visual Studio Online, which itself is a reskin on the two decade old Microsoft TFS) is somehow better than it. And everyone loves to hate on Microsoft products.

Are there any actually good enterprise grade Task tracker + Code repo combo that we should be suggesting the execs migrate to? Maybe the GitHub Enterprise product?

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

My org just rolled our own project management tool that matches our workflow now.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 173 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

AI-washing layoffs. They will replace jack shit with AI but that's a better story than "we have to reduce costs because we don't have cheap ways to refinance our $1B debt".

Credit isn't cheap and Iran is not going to make it cheaper, investments in software have tanked, so the only story that can still be told with an almost straight face is that they still have big growth opportunities thanks to the magic of AI.

[–] wosat@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is a Jira ticket (ID-240) for Atlassian requesting the ability to merge Atlassian accounts that is over 10 years old. I'm one of the 1,450 watchers. This news does not bode well for this ticket ever getting implemented.

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Hodgepodge.

AI will vibecode that into production in a week. And to make it all easier..it'll have merged your account with 10 competitors too so you know what they're working on!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peacefulpixel@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"AI is too dumb to take our jobs" as if that matters. that's not even the point, the point of Generative AI is to mine data and devalue human labour. according to the like 120 people who run this world too many people are making too much money so now we have a dogshit "technology" made to cut your wages whenever it's convenient.

[–] apple_train@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Atlassian is getting thrashed in the stockmarket and they're using AI as a get out of jail free card to conduct massive layoffs.

Its too bad that in the end they are just making forgettable tools that jira aside already have extensive competition, that actually feel built for enterprise vs the garbage atlassian is making.

If it wasn't for the army of agile cultists who claim that work is impossible without Jira they'd probably already be a much smaller company.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They will rehire for less. The AI hype is just a wage suppression scheme.

[–] Phunter@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My employer has been axing so many high level engineers it's not even funny. I think that's terrible for engineer morale. Why would you want to strive to improve and get promoted if it just makes you "too expensive to keep on payroll"?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We need more tech unions and tech coops.

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Guillotines we need more guillotines

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I’m amazed they had 1600 employees to begin with. I guess it takes a lot of resources to make something suck as hard as JIRA

3 coders and 1597 managers.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RicoBerto@piefed.blahaj.zone 57 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Yet they can sponsor an F1 team.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 128 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Of all the shitty AI products flooding the market right now, Atlassian's Rovo has got to be the most useless I've had the misfortune of using.

They should be hiring more workers to fix their AI slop, not replacing them with even more of it.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trying to get Rovo to do things in JIRA is like trying to train a chimp to cram shit back into an elephant’s ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

It’s not because of their garbage AI. It’s because their garbage AI is leading to people dropping them like a bad habit for open source and fucking Microsoft alternatives, so they need to reduce operating costs and CAPEX to demonstrate profit growth

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 72 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I FUCKING hate jira with a passion. I swear to god that dumbfuck software is nothing but a miserable time sink.

I am sorry for the people who got laid off. Also there is no way AI is replacing the CTO….

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (3 children)

About 6 months ago they spent more than half a billion acquiring The Browser Company whose only currently-being-developed product is a pretty wrapper for ChatGPT

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yet everyone helps feed this AI beast. No one thinks... Maybe I'm helping this through my data.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this post helps to feed the AI beast

there’s no escaping it; let’s not do with AI what we’ve done with CO2 and plastic and shift blame to individuals

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I agree. However we are feeding it not through the data, but through $, subscriptions and data minng.

We have a choice to renounce the subscription to meta, OpenAi, yet we dont.

[–] dudesss@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We have https://codeberg.org/ as an alternative to Bitbucket, and you can have free public static pages like Netlify or Github pages.

Codeberg also offers private repos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 87 points 2 days ago (25 children)

Atlassian now circling the drain.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 days ago (8 children)

So you telling me Jira and all its related bullshit will get even worse? I hadn't thought it possible.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 59 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The biggest surprise in the article is that Atlassian is not profitable. How? They pretty much have a monopoly in the Jira-like space (look , I can't even think of a generic name) and they charge a hefty sum for their products. How tf do they lose money?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The article lists an insane revenue of $1.6B, yet the losses are only on the order of $42M in the last 3 months. Against that much revenue, it looks to me like they are managing the company at a slight loss on purpose. They probably could close that gap if they wanted to, but have some favorable tax implications or something by running that "slight" loss.

(And who knows, maybe this is part of the attempt to close that gap and show a profit before the founders cash out and it all gets sold to a Shittier company)

load more comments (6 replies)

I don't think AI needs collaboration and project management software. Good luck with that future.

load more comments
view more: next ›