this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
135 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

82549 readers
3779 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vane@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

With Levels.fyi pegging the 75th percentile software engineer salary at $375,000, Tunguz estimates that adding $100,000 in annual inference costs brings the fully loaded cost to $475,000 — meaning just over 20% of the compensation cost could come from AI usage in the future.

and later

Tunguz has been building AI tools and models into his daily workflow and is automating 31 tasks a day at a cost of about $12,000 a year in inference.

This article is insane and proves me more that AI is product for rich people. Most of developers won't see $100k per year paycheck in their lifetime.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Maybe instead of food we can be paid in ozempic (to reduce appetite) and a very very tiny amount of food. all humanity would become very skinny, and then theres less health care costs due to obesity.

I should really be in charge here.

[–] Tharkys@lemmy.wtf 1 points 49 minutes ago

So that is why people think Grey aliens are just future humans! They took too much Ozempic and now they need to harvest genes from us to fix their own DNA.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

This is a bit like a job listing for a trade or technician position advertising they will supply a vehicle.

No shit, I need a van to do my job. You don't really have a choice.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 hours ago

Fuck sake, dont you all get it. The point in this kind of AI is massive data harvesting and tie it all together.

It wont go away, because that would mean you'll get some privacy back. You wont.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 48 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Construction companies should pay bricklayers in bricks and mortar

Uber should pay drivers in gas

Restaurants should pay chefs in raw ingredients

This is a radical idea, but maybe employers should be responsible for providing the supplies and tools their employees need to do their jobs? And the employees can just get money in return for their labor?

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

"People like you aren't in for the money!" -- always and only said by people who are in for the money

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

ceos get paid in empty promises and bad decisions?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Are arse reamings something they buy and sell, or a form of currency for ceo's? What about female CEOs? (not that its a huge problem-- maybe those few old-guard female ceos just pay you in money).

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 4 hours ago

employees can just get money

There's your problem, right there, money is dangerous, can't let the rabble have money - they might get too much and then they'd have power, power to disrupt the people who have money...

[–] XLE@piefed.social 24 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine having tech employees beg their employers for a work computer. That's basically what this article is suggesting.

I see a big silver lining on this cloud though: unlike a work computer, apparently AI subscriptions are not self-evidently worth having:

"It is starting to happen," Tunguz told me, as employee use of AI increasingly contributes to total cash burn. "It is a consideration for the Office of the CFO."

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

unlike a work computer, apparently AI subscriptions are not self-evidently worth having

Back in the 1980s it was highly debatable if there was value in desktop PCs beyond playing Solitare.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago

1981 was the year of the IBM PC, which was produced for 6 years and became a staple in the business world. Third-party software became widely available within a year. They were famous for the quality of the documentation.

Basically the opposite is true for AI's flagship LLMs, for every one of rise things. The creators are unable to make money, investors are getting nervous, their functionality is poorly explained to businesses, the list goes on.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 175 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

“You can spend your scrip at the company store.”

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 81 points 11 hours ago

You burn 16 tokens and what do you get?

Another day older and deeper in debt.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago

For the company.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 55 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

I can't wait till these companies start falling over so I can stop hearing about their ridiculous shit

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah man, we're going to have AI everything, we'll all exist in a metaverse, and everything will be run from tablet computers that we can access from our car as it drives us to and from work, where we will work way fewer hours. Employees will still have to physically show up to work I'm afraid.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

What’s the expression? Markets can stay irrational longer than you can remain sane… or something like that.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It starts to sound like the Romans giving out VIP seats for the Colosseum while you see the smoke and the first flames on the horizon.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

We've had smoke on the horizon for a long time now but the fire never comes. We've all learned that smoke and screams is just normal.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 hours ago

I can't wait till these companies start falling over so I can stop hearing about their ridiculous shit

If you have a 401k, selling "Large-Cap" indexes or "Full market" indexes can help. (and buying something else, don't leave it uninvested, obviously).

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 73 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

"Sorry, my mortgage servicer doesn't accept AI slop as payment, so I'll just take the money"

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 4 points 7 hours ago

Sorry, Trump just ruled mortgages are illegal.

God this timeline is so fucking dumb

[–] tal@lemmy.today 98 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

OpenAI exec highlights the rising importance of AI compute in tech job compensation.

In other news, Roblox executive thinks that having companies pay employees partly in Robux would be a great idea.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Robux and pedophile-bucks.

[–] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 37 points 10 hours ago

altr Yeah, I make 100,000 robux per year, get in bitches

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"Random bullshit Go!" meme..

They've finally proven that ALL they care-about is preventing integrity from having any root in any economy they're infesting, & that ANYTHING that displaces correct-view is worth pushing, to prevent correct-view.

That changes the framing, in my eyes:

That means that it isn't what they're pushing that is The Problem: they're simply too machiavellian to bother negotiating with.

THEY are the problem.

I'd want private-investigators on them, & I'd want a good war-chest for prosecuting them, once their corruption's evidence was unearthed, enough.

People THAT anti-integrity consistently create evidence of their corruption.

The state won't prosecute them ( big herds ONLY respect big herds, & corporations are herds, which is why when accountability threatens, they simply "dissipate", and .. "nobody is responsible!" .. same as herds ), so activist-groups are going to have to do it.

Totally different framing.

_ /\ _

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Mate, I don’t want to be mean or give unsolicited advice, but I do want to help.

Your comment is well meant and I kind of get what you want to say, but it’s so hard to follow. It shows signs of incoherence and hyperassociativity. You’ve also written hundreds of lines of comments in the past few hours and they are all in a similar style. This might just be your style, but it is often a sign of schizophrenia, psychosis or mania.

I really hope you will talk to a doctor about this, or at least a family member or friend that you can confide in.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

These dudes seriously seem to have zero clue about being a human being.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The concept of acting like a human being is for the peasants to worry about.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 43 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

AI companies who can't find anyone to buy their product, swear their employees would rather have their product in exchange for labor rather than money...

Which could easily be used to buy the product no one outside the company is buying.

This is just a way to juice metrics and claim this "compensation" as sales on the books.

And I'm almost positive the "per user growth" they're talking about is just how brain rot addicts will use chatbots for everything once their brain atrophies from not using it. But just by mentioning that they had to admit that overall use wasn't a metric they wanted to talk about.

It's like how a small percentage of drinkers (the alcoholics) buy the vast amount of alcohol. Less people drinking is bad for the company, and a few alcoholics can't sustain the company without being replaced by new addicts.

Edit:

Also, isn't this literally a plot point from Silicon Valley?

Like, their desperation move to get funding at some point was handing out compute tokens, but the only people who wanted to buy it was their competitors because non of the companies had customers?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Ha. Succumbing to Ads, selling their AI super-weapon to the most insanely violent US Fascist regime, and now trying to use compute as payment for staff and whatnot. They are really doing great :-)

I can't wait for the lazy/scammy shareholders to lose all their stolen value..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 10 hours ago

Awesome! Now they can lose money and get wrong answers at the same time!

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

Salary is 64GB of virtual ram

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley is buzzing about this new idea: Slavery

FIFY

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

It's slavery but with AI. (Silicon Valley execs foaming at the mouth from excitement)

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Can't they just pay me in NFTs?

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago

Hey you know what I could use to buy compute or literally anything else

[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

How about compensation for making all hardware so expensive? How about compensation to artists for violating their work to train your precious models? How about compensation for the CO2 that they are spewing into to atmosphere?

[–] krimson@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

They are going full panic mode now. The crash has already begun.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

It’s like a grift card, only redeemable by the employer with your time, without the card.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Well, this is a fresh kind of hell...

[–] db2@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Like all their ideas this one is also recycled.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fierysparrow89@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

😊😁😂🤣

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 7 points 11 hours ago

Getting high on their own supply again I see.

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

This reminds me of workers being paid in vodka during the USSR era. 😬

I wonder if it's a coincidence.

load more comments
view more: next ›