this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
408 points (95.7% liked)

196

5891 readers
1212 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 153 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I am irrationally annoyed that fuck was censored. Ridiculous.

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Engagement bait successful 🙂

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is Lemmy, there's nothing to gain even

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You have no idea how seriously people take internet points then.

There's websites to buy accounts and everything.

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Engagement means nothing on lemmy lol, there is no algorithm to appease

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 22 hours ago

Copy-pasting my own comment from before:

You have no idea how seriously people take internet points then.

There's websites to buy accounts and everything.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

No, that's a rational reaction.

[–] drthunder@midwest.social 40 points 1 day ago

I don't think it's irrational at all, with all the fascist shit that's going on we might as well not do their work for them.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

Did you know that you're allowed to say fuck on the Internet?

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine the glass blowers back in the day when glow in the dark glassware was in fashion.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I think they're better off than the girls licking the radioactive paint brushes... Not that either group is having good time.

[–] duckythescientist@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's not that much uranium in uranium glass, uranium isn't all that radioactive, and the glass blowers wouldn't be eating it like a lot of the radium girls were. I could maybe see some issues if they are using it as a glaze depending on how they applied it. (And technically the uranium glass is fluorescent not glow in the dark.)

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Eating molten glass was generally discouraged anyway.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Funny a book I read literally today, published 1918 had radium as the mysterious magic treasure hidden in the island with healing powers. Well, and also cancerous sores powers. They knew what happened to Curie.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Radium Girls book was pretty good, recommend reading it if you haven’t already.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dear lord. I don't think I can stomach that read, but when I hear people (Americans really) bitch about government regulations, this is the kind of bullshit that comes to mind and makes me boil...

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Back in the day, a Socialist named Upton Sinclair wrote a novel called "The Jungle." It was about the terrible conditions in the Chicago slaughterhouses.

It caused a lot of people to stop buying processed meat.

The meat packers got together and demanded the government step in.

We got food regulations because the processors wanted to keep making money.

[–] EarlOfSam@quokk.au 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And he wrote it to emphasize the terrible working conditions but everyone, instead, went, "Ew, I'm eating that??"

Great book. More relevant today than ever.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, the way to change work conditions is strikes, nothing else really helps. But it works for the exact same reason the book did - because if workers are striking they can't make money, so they agree to work regulations so they can keep profiting.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That was me when I read the book the best democracy money can Buy and it got to the section on the slaughter house industry. Self regulation is best regulation....

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Or if you prefer podcasts over reading then this is a fantastic episode:

https://timharford.com/2023/12/cautionary-tales-how-the-radium-girls-fought-back/