this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
623 points (97.0% liked)

Political Memes

2306 readers
658 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

On their defense, I'd be pretty curious myself to see 3 titties.

What mortal could resist the call of the 3 tiddied siren?

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 248 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 116 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

FACT CHECK:

Un-shocking tldr: X account is spreading misinfo

Source article: https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence/maga-men-swindled-by-ai-model/ar-AA1Yvein

Original picture (note the human number of mammaries):

image

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I'll be honest, the real pictures would fool me. The era where you could tell by the number of fingers or toes is gone, apparently. She does seem to change military branches a bit too often to be realistic. And, her colleagues seem a bit too unbothered by someone taking a picture of her with her shoes and socks off and feet up on a desk in an apparent military setting. But there aren't any pictures I glance at and think "oh, that's obviously AI".

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My only immediate reaction would be "The fuck is that badge thing" followed by "why is the car British and why are there plate carriers strapped to the seats". But otherwise I would initially think it's just low quality slop, especially after the IDF thirst trap propaganda trend.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what modern military wear is. The badge thing seems strange, but I don't know if it's wrong. I can imagine putting plate carriers on the seats to dry them out if it has been hot and sweaty, but I don't know if that's actually common. As for the car, I would guess there are places where they might use what's available locally, and who knows what that would be.

You have to admit that it's at least high-quality slop. No extra hands, no extra toes or fingers. No text that is obviously slop.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

High quality? Yes. Good under scrutiny? Absolutely fucking not.

Just to further my the points I made. The badge is stupid and indistinct also why the fuck would they be wearing it in fatigues. The plate carriers are strapped to the seats in a way I'm not even sure would be possible for their size. And the car is a fucking mess of random design elements and even eras, this one is hard to put into words but the interior has bits taken from GM cars, Land Rovers, and even some Toyota elements, also the vents are all fucked.

Point is that you can easily rip this image apart if you just look for things that just don't make sense. Hell the plate carriers alone being strapped that tightly to the seats are fucking weird.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if you just look for things that just don't make sense.

Do we have to do that with every image we see now? I would bet that a real image also has a lot of things that don't make sense. I feel sorry for people who genuinely have 6 fingers. It's rare, but it happens.

No not really, most of the AI slop out there is still obviously flawed in some ways that are obvious. Liquids, consistent backgrounds, and general weirdness can all be solid signs but none of these things are individually signs of AI. Honestly the best way to pick it out isn't any individual but of weirdness but compounding weirdness, this image for example has the plate carriers, no door handle on the car, the interior having multiple manufacturers design elements, the stupid badge, and that I can't define what's going on in the background. Any one of these could just be weird but together is a general tell tale of AI.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] djdarren@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

Nothing says "serious journalism" like that article censoring the term "foot fetish".

[–] Lawnman23@piefed.social 58 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Klear@quokk.au 54 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You mean the perfect amount?

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 30 points 3 days ago (3 children)

how am i supposed to put my face between her tits if there's another tit taking up that space i ain't got two heads bro

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That's why Zaphod funded Eccentra Gallumbits.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look at that chest. Three boobs for Tue price of two.

[–] SoloPhoenyx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 71 points 3 days ago (8 children)

The third boob didn't give it away?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 8 points 2 days ago

Baby, you make me wish I had 3 hands

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

I swear I've met way too many people who developed an early fetish from this because it was the first boobs they'd seen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Given how frequently GOP conventions crash grindr, maybe the hetrosexuality is performative and they paid less attention to the boobs than you or I did.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world 98 points 3 days ago (6 children)

She looks like the chick with three tits in the bar from the first Total Recall

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

~~Incredibly surprising that the AI did the feet better than the tits~~

Nevermind the photo in the OP is altered to look more fake. Most reliable X post

[–] Switorik@lemmy.zip 48 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm having a flashback to Total Recall

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They must be the easiest people to scam

Seeing as how they got scammed into voting into :: waves hands at everything :: this, yeah. 100%, without a doubt, we have a huge voting block that are also marks for grift after nationalism-flavored grift.

Joking aside, if we want long-term solutions, we absolutely must get to the bottom of how that keeps happening.

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Well there is that thing where for the entirety of my 50 plus years on this Earth, the conservatives have been striving to destroy public education

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MissesAutumnRains@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm confused, how is this stealing? They paid for pictures, they got pictures.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Amuletta@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

During the pandemic I frequently wished I could lose my conscience and make all kinds of money from the rabid anti-mask and anti-vax crowd. I could be so rich now.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What the hell is that on her chest? That should have been a dead giveaway but Magats be Magats. Sex is baaaaaad and siiiinnn, but we happily pay money to AI OnlyFans accounts!

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Cort@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 days ago

Yep militaristic propaganda using "sexy" women is widespread and disgusting from the US to Israel though they usually manage not to use such obvious ai.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 32 points 3 days ago (5 children)

So, now you can make money on onlyfans without ever appearing yourself.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is this how openai will make money?

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 4 points 2 days ago

Probably. Let’s be real. If new tech can be monetized for sex, it will be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 15 points 3 days ago

image

legit DDG search I just did "best ai generator for " 4th autocomplete was "onlyfans'

We are all chumps. Dumbfucks who work for paychecks all day. The sharks are already crowding each other out in a feeding frenzy for the free money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

I am not even fucking kidding you. In times of desperation, I do think "Man... I ain't pretty, I ain't smart, I got no quick ways to make money except... scamming a bunch of morons"

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If they were smart they wouldn't be maga. Because they are maga, you can infer they are stupid. Poor reasoning skills. Poor emotional regulation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Everyone understandably points out the 3 boobs, but the patches and insignas on the t-shirt is laughable too.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (7 children)

And the right side steering wheel on a supposedly US military vehicle...

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] okcomputer@piefed.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Does the site actually allow you to do this and receive payments in your name? That’s wild

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

MAGA families dealing with the consequences of having an unstable imbecile for a patriarch/matriarch

senior citizen financial stability disintegration SFX

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

It's very funny to me how blatant it's a foot fetish picture too.

load more comments
view more: next ›