this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8587 readers
207 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I am being brought to one of these No Kings marches on Saturday. Any pointers on talking to libs in a way that they will listen and get curious about Socialism?

A couple orgs will be there including PSL, but from comrades' stories from the last two of these they don't actually bring up Socialism during their speaking slots and talk about imperialism instead. I would like to be more explicit in tying what is happening to Capitalism and especially try to get across that Trump is just a symptom of the problem.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] calidris@hexbear.net 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'll lay out some things I've learned, particularly in the last year or so, that are effective at these sorts of events. Be mindful that much of this is situational, so adapt accordingly. 

For starters, bring a table of some sort as well as something to provide other protesters. Water, coffee, snacks, etc. This will provide an opening for engagement. Also on the table, printed material. I suggest bringing material from your org despite your reluctance stated elsewhere. You never know who might be in attendance and you might find attendees who are more open minded than you think, especially considering current conditions. I helped set up and work with a local org that is anti-capitalist/anti-imperialist and works to build community and solidarity in the immediate area. Despite what others have said, not everyone is ready to dive in head first to socialist/communist ideas. This org acts as an entry point for those people as well as providing mutual aid and community defense programs. It's also a sort of pipeline into more theory heavy groups once they reach that level. I bring printed material from this org as well.

Your ice breakers stated elsewhere are good, but depending on the situation, might want to reeled back just a bit. I've had great success with "Trump is the symptom, capitalism is the disease" on signs. For MLK and Einstein, maybe print out a relevant quote and leave it at that. These libs often need to be handheld and this is a good way to ease them into things. While somewhat bothersome in my opinion, the terms Epstein class, pedo class, and billionaire class are effective for strengthening the idea of class consciousness. In reality it's all referencing the capitalist class, but you can get into that later.

I brought up whether you are known because this determines how deep into the theory you can effectively go without scaring off folks. I've been going around to local lib protests for the last year and have made a name for myself amongst many. They know what I'm about to some degree, and have become comrades in other endeavors. Many are ready and willing to help out with mass orgs, which opens the door to further radicalization like the other org I mentioned above.

If you have the willingness and ability, find a chant book and lead them in chants. If you have a megaphone, that's even better. There's hardly any leadership and organization at these things, in my experience. Fill that role.

I understand your frustration with the marches as you also stated. I'll keep my own opinions of PSL to myself, but the marches do serve a purpose as well. Aside from being a good way to raise awareness and educate with counter-propaganda, they are good places to network and meet like-minded people which will be crucial in the days ahead. I've met many at these and other events that have joined me in labor organizing and mass org work that have proven invaluable.

Good luck out there comrade.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 1 points 22 hours ago
[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A couple orgs will be there including PSL, but from comrades' stories from the last two of these they don't actually bring up Socialism during their speaking slots and talk about imperialism instead.

maybe because PSL is smarter than you at agitating

[–] calidris@hexbear.net 9 points 23 hours ago

Hopefully they also possess tact far exceeding your own.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If all they actually do is agitate towards attending more toothless marches then what good is that?

[–] immuredanchorite@hexbear.net 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Something political drew out large numbers of people who could be at the bar or gaming on the couch- and instead of exciting them about getting involved and accomplishing more you scold them for having not already made “something” happen (nevermind whether that “something” has been well articulated and won mass appeal)

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

How many people need to stand outside with puns on their signs before the revolution happens?

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

i feel like you are misunderstanding the point of a march. if you measured every single activity by how close it gets you to revolution, you would be able to do anything

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Did the Bolsheviks run marches like this. And if so, how did they run them in a way that built revolutionary power? Did Mao's movement do these? IDK

It is funny thinking of some lib in 1916 holding a "If the Tzar was gone we'd be at brunch" sign

[–] immuredanchorite@hexbear.net 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. The Bolsheviks absolutely had marches and demonstrations leading up to the revolution. And many strikes would inevitably be followed up with mass demonstrations of people in the streets on top of the many other mass mobilizations that led to things like International Womens Day and bloody sunday that led to an explosion of revolutionary consciousness and exposed the state as a weapon of class oppression.

The same is true with the Chinese revolution- of course there was a protracted armed struggle- but this was after many mass mobilizations that led to things like the May 4th movement, which led to the CPC itself. Even in new China, demonstrations and mass mobilization played a massive role in things like the great proletarian cultural revolution and shaped modern china post revolution. Even during the long march, the CPC went through each town and set up Lenin Clubs (which often offered simple social activities like ping pong or basketball) and put on revolutionary opera performances (typically just a way to draw in peasants to a message about uniting china against japanese imperialism, not socialism itself)

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 1 points 19 hours ago

Appreciate the info, it helps

[–] casskaydee@hexbear.net 2 points 20 hours ago

Neither of those movements started in material conditions even remotely like ours, at least at the moment

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 2 points 18 hours ago

Idea, showing this to people I meet Saturday

I need to help break these peoples notions that America is in anyway good or redeemable. If folks have similar UN vote images from the Oba or Biden years that would help me make my case in anticipation of the "that's Trump's fault"

[–] jack@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When my PSL comrades talk at these lib-attended events we definitely talk socialism, but you don't just shout the word. Talk about the billionaire class and that their interests - especially this imperialist war - can never be resolved at ours.

But generally, more important than going with your list of talking points is going prepared to listen. Ask people why they're there and draw connections from the issues they raise through capitalism to other issues. Focus on the intractability of political solutions under the current political and economic system. Find the people who really want to do something and swap contact info with them.

What are your goals?

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

My goals are to agitate, get people thinking of doing things beyond "vote" and definitely doing something beyond showing up to marches. I think PSL is better in other places because here all they do is protests.

I don't want to send people to my org either outside maybe 101s. The problem is we are too academic and not practical enough. I want less theory, more action. The theory only appeals to a small subset of people. I also don't know if I should pitch some mutual aid because it sounds out of touch if the whole world is waves wildly... and my advice is to grow a garden?

Hoping hexbears have a better solution because I'm very disenchanted with the left in general. Feels like we just talk in circles and nothing material ever changes.

[–] Oskolki@hexbear.net 2 points 20 hours ago

You could think of it like this:

There's

  • politically aware, unaware, active inactive members of society,
  • then there's those who try to lead people, those who follow instructions and those who observe, those who try to learn, those who imitate etc.
  • the ones who communicate things in-between.

Then there's problems of our societies, the contradictions, class struggles.

What are the problems? Who is attending the rallies? who is leading them? who isn't attending them? why do they attend them? why don't they? Who is delivering the messages, what means are they using? If it's the internet who is browsing the internet?

What would be the interests of a crowd that's gathered on a workday during work hours? what's their age? Is there a better way we could communicate? Are there people who we could draw to join? Are the organizers deliberately avoiding certain demographics of people? why? How could we get those inactive observers to join us? Is there a way we could survey people and direct those letters towards organizers? Perhaps people are too scared to speak their mind so what can we do there to get the point across? I could go on, but this is the sort of questions we have to ask.

It's tough. There will be clashing interests, all sots of stuff.

ideally if you're organizing for socialism you'd want a crowd that turns their head around and yells at you about their real problems that aren't being addressed and you'd know what to do, but this is seemingly not happening, there's a problem, are these people really socialists or are they here out of sympathy for the victims and their heart hurt? could they be turned into socialists? what stops them from it? Who are you and what do you want? Those are the questions all of us should be asking.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 3 points 23 hours ago

I don't want to send people to my org either outside maybe 101s.

If you don't have an alternative, do this. Get your org to prepare for it. You can't gesture vaguely at things you'd like to happen - they need concrete alternatives.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I just ask libs what they think the protest is accomplishing. Usually you get a variety of answers, all of which are obviously wrong. Then I ask them what their followup actions are. When they say they don't know, I ask the first question again.

This annoys them heavily but eventually it starts to click for some of them

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idea for an ice breaker: "What do MLK, Einstein, and Jesus have in common? They all supported Socialism."

"Trump is the symptom. Capitalism is the disease. Socialism is the cure."

"Why do you think Florida Republicans are so scared of you learning about Socialism and Communism? And why is it they never do the same thing for Nazi ideology?"

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't know if you want to spec into introductory quips for this crowd, unless you have like 5 seconds with each of them, which I think would be somewhat of a misguided approach anyways here.

Part of the thing with agitating in my experience—as well as having people hear you out in general—is you don't want to come off as an evangelist/salesman. The second someone hears you using stock lines, they tend to put their guard up or just entirely tune you out. They'll think you’re trying to sell them a bill of goods, which people are increasingly on guard about these days, as unapologetic scams and hustles gradually take over the American 'culture.'

To break the ice, the best thing you can do is just ask them a conversational, surface-level question that allows them to talk about their own experiences and beliefs (e.g. "so, what brings you out here?") Let them talk about themselves, and try to be a respectful-but-active listener when they're talking (e.g. "yeah, no, same here. I get it, yeah, he sucks. You do xyz for a living? I've heard a little bit about that, how's it treating you? Yeah, gas prices are wringing me dry, it's really bad, they said it was bad under Biden, but now, oof.) Essentially, try to be/seem genuinely interested in hearing about them as a person, and show that interest by responding to what they are sharing in a way that shows them that you view them as an equal and you are engaging with them genuinely.

If you absolutely have to steer the conversation (i.e. if it doesn't drift where you want it to after some time), try to naturally segue into your points with an innocuous hook (e.g. "you know, we're out here, all of us, but it's kind of hard to feel like we're accomplishing much with what we're doing here in particular") though try to employ this only after at least a few conversational turns have passed, so that you veering off into it it isn't jarring.

It’s a similar mechanism to how people build community/network in general, the first and foremost goal should be to front your interest in connecting with them as a peer. It doesn't even have to be a deep/long conversation to get to the points you want to get to. You can get to explicit agitation in merely a couple conversational turns. You just open with something that immediately communicates your interest in them and their personal beliefs, which makes them in turn more interested in talking to you about why you're out here, and then you get to share about yourself and bring up some of the things you're thinking about that would allow you to naturally bring up your critiques. Because you've already shown good-faith interest in them and their beliefs, they'll be naturally more open to learning about you and your beliefs.

[–] immuredanchorite@hexbear.net 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Anti-Imperialism is Anti-Capitalism with a socialist and internationalist character …. and imperialism is the primary contradiction in the world that every Communist and Socialist/socialist system faces. Anti-imperialism in the imperial core is also a fantastic gateway into socialism, as the class that are waging war on the periphery are also oppressing and exploiting the core. We can point to the injustices of the US military-finance-complex/its proxies and draw a direct line to the US ruling class/Wall St. The people of the world, including the US, will never find liberation without destroying US empire. So I don’t understand why you would think the conversations would be either/or.

The anti-imperialist movement in the imperial core is essential in maintaining the class character of the revolutionary movement, it serves as both a practical function and a litmus test- otherwise it can and will be coopted by opportunism and bourgeois politics. It is a signal to the people of authenticity and honesty in principle and its consistency will ultimately foment trust in true working class organization.

Your other comment that you don’t want to direct the masses of people to your own org tells me that you already understand your org will fail at emboldening the masses of people and that you do not believe the people will embrace your politics. If you want to get out of insular, academic circles and create an organ of power for the working class and oppressed- you should change your analysis and actions.

Your pessimism and short-sighted view that the PSL only leads to more toothless marches also leads me to believe that you 1) don’t understand what the PSL is doing tactically or strategically 2) don’t understand that these demonstrations are actually for the people- and are a method of mass communication that can spread consciousness and when well timed and thoughtful can elevate the agency of the masses of people 3) your politics is divorced from the material reality of US workers

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 2 points 20 hours ago

these demonstrations are actually for the people- and are a method of mass communication that can spread consciousness and when well timed and thoughtful can elevate the agency of the masses of people

its a major blindspot at the moment that people don't understand the purpose of demonstrations. it feels like even on hexbear we've normalised the same attitude that 14 year olds on reddit tend to spread- that its all self indulgent counter productive nonsense.

Its a shame because people do get activated at these things and if not that, then at least better primed to absorb radical messaging in future.

Not that i blame anyone, especially No Kings seems to be a platform for everyone, so alongside the revolutionary current there's also the establishment libs trying to ride the wave, which leads to mindkill propaganda from them becoming associated with getting out and getting red mad and nude with your community.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

that you 1) don’t understand what the PSL is doing tactically or strategically

I honestly don't, and I say this about my org too.

I'm a results oriented thinker. I need to see actions that lead to results. I don't see that. Part of that is it's hard to have a "class consciousness score". But beyond our work building some bus benches and building some menstrual hygiene kits for homeless people... I don't have a win I can point to. I like doing the charity stuff but what I really want is to see we can force a concession out of a business or city council member.

I'm not trying to pick on PSL. They're just the ones speaking at the protests. All left orgs leave me wanting something more effective. At least with elections, and we all love elections here, there's a clear goal, a clear end date, and you can measure your effectiveness down to the neighborhood level...

Part of me wonders if I don't have the right brain for this. I'm not a people person to start with (yaay Autism) and this not-concrete "sway the masses" stuff just doesn't compute with my mind.

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a results oriented thinker

how many people an org mobilizes to a march is a concrete result, is it not?

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, if it led to some sort of tangible result. I guess what I'm missing and critical of is how to get from people in the streets to people taking power? Because all my life I have seen lots of these marches and big rallies and not a single bill or vote changed because of them.

[–] calidris@hexbear.net 1 points 20 hours ago

What you're looking for is organizing. Labor organizing, tenant organizing, and organizing mass orgs (educational, mutual aid, etc.).

This is where the power of the party can truly be utilized.

[–] calidris@hexbear.net 2 points 23 hours ago

Are you known amongst the attending crowd? This is an important factor on how focused your agitprop should be and on what.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

I think it depends on where the person is in their leftist journey so far, so maybe a probing question to start with to find that out, or like bringing up something recent and seeing how they feel about that to judge where they are?

After that, idk. Definitely going to try to come back to this question though because it's a good one. All my points I can think of right now are about imperialism lately because it's in the news, but maybe something about AI? Everyone has been starting to acknowledge that it's pretty cool sometimes but there are parts of it that are hugely sucky, and it's hard to ignore when everyone is losing their jobs constantly lately with AI often being the excuse.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

The pedophile ruling class is not gonna let you vote your way out of this one.