this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
407 points (99.0% liked)

News

36774 readers
4780 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Army will now allow recruits to enlist up to age 42 and has removed a waiver requirement for those with a marijuana-related conviction.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 24 minutes ago

See the world! Burn it all down!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 hours ago

They're going to have to really redo their advertising if they're going to attract stoners. All that advertising is about how you can see the world (and then blew it up) and get free training (in skills that are utterly useless outside of the military) and become a hero (by having your legs blown off).

All of that sounds like way too much hard work. I just want to do my 8 hours and then go home. Also virtually every civilian job pays better. It's amazing anyone joins up.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

A final reminder that I'm at the crest of a hill sloping downward.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Don’t worry, you pick up speed as you go. It’s fun! See ya at the bottom!

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Calling Captain Donald bone spurs, you're needed in the recruitment tent.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The Army has been fine with some criminal record workarounds for a while now. Pot use shouldn’t even be on the radar.

Mark me down as having bone spurs

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if this will bring out all those big macho MAGAs, eager to fight for Dear Leader?

Yeah. And Neil Breen will win Best Director next year.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 6 hours ago

They'd have to go to military fat camp first, and then enlisted into the crutch brigade, as copied from the current Russian model.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But no beards ya god damn hippie!

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

He's at Tyrone's.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

FYI, we would have to lose A LOT of soldiers before a draft makes sense. We are not even in the ballpark.

[–] RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They can still fuck with a lot of people without a draft though.

Most U.S. enlistment contracts have a period of four years in the inactive ready reserves (IRR) after the normal four years of active duty. Not to mention the active reserves and national guard.

That's a lot of people leading otherwise normal, mostly civilian lives, that could get called up. Granted, that's not the same as a straight up draft - all of those people choose to sign up in some capacity.

But we have a lot of bodies on tap to churn through the human meat grinder before a draft.

Isn't that exciting and reassuring?

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's not how that works. Both of my little brothers were in different branches of the military, and they had to make a choice to decide if they'd re-sign after their 4 year enlistment.

[–] RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

That is how it works, I was in the U.S. military.

The choice your brothers were given at the end of their four years was whether or not to sign up for another four years of active duty. Their initial contract was almost certainly actually for eight years, including four years active duty and four years IRR.

People don't talk about the IRR because there are nearly zero requirements during that time, it's not the same as the active reserves. No reporting in, no fitness, medical, or training standards, etc. It just means you're among the first on the hook if ol' uncle sam "needs" more people ASAP, and they can legally recall you to active duty without instituting a draft.

There are exceptions for some job roles and other circumstances, but that's how the standard enlistment works.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I stand corrected, they confirmed what you're saying.

[–] RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 minutes ago (1 children)

What the hell just happened? You admitted you had incorrect information and accepted the correction in a mature and civil manner?

Nah, you're supposed to dig in and argue for hours. Maybe go through my post history to inspire some ad hominem attacks. Throw in some slurs if you're feeling feisty.

I guess I'll just go back to work if you're going to help foster an environment of constructive dialogue like that.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

Screw you asshole! Better? ;)

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

Since when does anything have to make sense?

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

A draft is the only method the US has of actually invading and occupying Iran. We literally don't have enough troops to do it with a volunteer army.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Occupation is a bad strategy anyway

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah which would make it plan A according to this administration.

It's also the only way they could actually win. Well other than just leaving, but they're not going to do that.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Except it's the only way of actually toppling the Iranian government. That's why this is quickly turning into another Vietnam. Vietnam was a quagmire because we couldn't actually invade and occupy North Vietnam without dragging the Chinese into it like in the Korean War. So we were stuck trying to fight an air war and and indirect ground campaign from within South Vietnam. It's the same exact dynamic with Iran. We can't practically do the thing actually required to win. So we're just stuck in an endless meat grinder as the Iranian government proves yet again that you can't topple a government via air strikes. And national pride won't let us just pack up and leave. It's Vietnam all over again. Can't win. Can't leave. Just stuck there until our political will finally breaks.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 1 points 6 hours ago

Never been happier to be disabled...

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 16 points 12 hours ago

One of these things is good. Unfortunately, all of it is in service of getting warm bodies to participate in Operation Epstein's Fury.

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I don't know what is allowed~!

[Platoon: I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS ALLOWED~!]

Government zah is mighty loud~!

[Platoon: GOVERNMENT ZAH IS MIGHTY LOUD!]

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago

One puff

Two puff

Pass that shit on down the line.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HotDog7@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Have either of you ever been convicted of a Felony?

Convicted...? No, no... Never convicted...

[–] songwriterallnighter@lemmy.zip 41 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

I think they should raise the upper and the lower limit. Let’s send 55 to 85 year olds. Maybe that way it will end sooner.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

Send the politicians first. World peace achieved in 1 day.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

That should be a global policy. These old fucks can start fighting their own wars for once in history

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›