Ask Experienced Devs

Been seeing "AI-native" too, and I work at a university. I forgive them for following the money, but me and the other techs have to constantly remind leadership that the average person is not excited about LLMs. And that going all-in could do reputational and credibility damage to the institution we currently work at.

I work for a financial company where our largest clients look to us for fiscally conservative actions. Thankfully, that trickles down to create an IT division that is aware of current trends, but usually doesn't chase the bleeding edge.

Let the risk takers tank the challenges, and we'll come in after and benefit from what's already been figured out.

We just opened Copilot chat to our users late last year. We discovered, and squashed, a whole slew of people trying to shadow IT their way into "supercharging their workflows with AI". A few were fired for shoving private info into public and unapproved models, but not nearly enough.

I work for a small ~30-person company with various customers, including some very big names. We're very deliberate about where tools like those could help us, where it's worth the exploration and investment. We want to be innovative and have the expertise, but at the same time, be reasonable and sound. We're also very conscious of data sharing and safeguards, in part out of necessity, because we can't just share our customers' code or data with third parties.

Excitement, commitment, use, and hopes of using AI tools differ between colleagues. What we can use and how differs between projects.

So yes, there are definitely other kinds of companies and environments out there.

My company made the announcement during a meeting that we're going full AI. Our website is going to get sloppified, our software is going to get sloppified, and it's going to let our clients sloppify even harder. They're expecting everybody to start using AI in our workflows somehow, not just engineers. They're going to look at the numbers and ask questions if anybody isn't using Claude enough.

I'm protected for now because my environment is a bit more locked down, so they can't expect me to use AI, yet.

They can fire me when that day comes. I refuse to use generative AI.

Yes. Also big tech

We've been commanded to rework all workflows to be agentic, whatever the hell that means.

I think somewhere in my organisation there's a very strong bulwark against AI encroachment, and I suspect it's our IT security because data protection and privacy are pretty much their top priority (we take it seriously in general). I don't think I've read anything published or sent internally that reads like AI slop.

Not as bad, but they have started setting goals for how much AI we should use. No one knows what the fuck that means. Just this magical belief that any use of AI somehow increases productivity, despite there being scientific studies that it actually lowers productivity.

At a standup meeting, CEO asked whether we use AI and I was the only one who said that I don't use it at all, or very rarely, starting a little discussion. Overall, their position is somewhat moderate. They do fall for the hype a lot (especially with the recent Claude stuff) but it did not seem that it was a requirement for us to use it. But they were curious why I do not embrace this so much and I said that I can feel myself getting more and more stupid when using these tools, due to the mental offloading. This seemed to resonate a bit with the others, at least I could feel that my coworkers in the round got my point, despite remaining silent.

Coworker recently came to my desk and jokingly asked why I was typing out code by hand when I could ask Claude to generate it for me, but there was also a bit of seriousness to it, so I cringed a lot

More than 95% of management is utterly incompetent. All they do is follow the newest grift because they are not capable and don't want to actually evaluate something based on necessity or need. Examples of this are Agile, Cloud (AWS, Azure, etc), AI and many more.

Yep. Big healthcare, same thing.

It's like they don't realize that AI at best is as good as having a mailroom full of overeager interns. Who in their right mind would want to put in front of clients?! Or worse have it run critical business systems.

Any sort of tech company was always a headless chicken. It's just that when software developers were the hot thing on the horizon we were oblivious to the stupidity that thrives in corporate.

If you think about a business that maximizes profit, and sample opinions from the business side about the business domain.. you would be forgiven to assume the replies are nothing short of genius. However, the facade of brilliance falls apart the moment you attempt to sample anything adjacent to business or unrelated to it. You will realize that having experience in and making a lot of money does not translate well to other endeavors where making money is not the main concern.

Now that we have been milked dry like Apids in an Ant farm and have been virtually kicked out of the money making complex, we start to realize we were just cattle all along and that praise for our stature in the industry as the eponymous "genius" of the entire operation was just flattery to assuage any inconvenience we perceived through corporate bullshit. They succeeded in avoiding drawing our ire towards the incredibly narrow-sighted and hollow endeavor that is making the line go up exponentially.

Now that facade has fallen face first at the dawn of the LLM era. The arrogance that hid from software engineers and developers but was all too apparent to blue collar and "lesser" corporate functions has shown it's face to us, the enlightened morons.

Thanks for coming to (hehe) my TED talk

I'm cleaning up AI slop but have been tasked with using more AI to do it faster and deliver more features. Doesn't matter to me. I'm getting paid 🤷 It'll be somebody else's problem soon enough, if the company survives.

My eye will be on the job market soon and I do wonder what it will be like. It seems like AI is eroding the minds of many.

Nope, definitely taken the position that LLM- based "AI" is actively harmful, at best.

That being said... It is a casino. So it makes sense they are generally pretty risk-averse.

I’m lucky I’m in a company that hasn’t gone far deep into the AI rabbit hole. They have set up Claude Code for us and encourage us to use it if we want, but that’s about it.

Microsoft?