this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29789 readers
1882 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

After his flip to the dark side post election, I honestly don't know why there aren't a lot more people cosplaying as Republicans. That side is so easily duped that anyone who comes out faking hate for moinorities, or claiming the government is a swamp you could easily win and then just flip afterwards.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I do have a friend who ran for county judge as a Democrat and was defeated. Four years later, she ran as a Republican and won. Her politics are the same as ever, but that (R) on the ticket makes the locals fill in her bubble every time she's up for reelection.

[–] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

To wholeheartedly promote Republican policies requires brain damage, which we don't yet have the technology to reverse.

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

I could easily lie about that stuff and be convincing enough to enought morons to make them think I'm on their side. You live near enough conservatives and christians and you learn how to fake it.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The war powers resolution failed 49 to 50 as the Pennsylvanian was the only Democrat to vote with Republicans who control the Senate. Three Republicans — U.S. Sens. Rand Paul, of Kentucky; Susan Collins, of Maine; and Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska — voted with Democrats.

Saying that Fetterman's vote was deciding is silly, when it was a 49 to 50 vote - every vote was deciding.

And the Republican dissenter votes are purely performative. They pull this shit all the time, with the same persons. Who would never vote against their party, if the vote could truly fail. Especially Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski do this all the time. Hence the people here blaming the Democrats for being captured are sheep being tricked by the Republican performance.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 1 points 2 days ago

I'm seeing fifty complete cunts.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Literally the opposite of what he was elected to do. Such a shame. He’s a piece of shit, and I hope the worst for him.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I voted for him and I've never felt so betrayed by a politician I was actually kinda cool with being in a position of power.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Brain damage made him go from sorta quietly right leaning Democrat to a full-blown Republicrat.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least we know definitively that brain damage is what makes people support conservative views.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The dementia epidemic is what’s going to start WW3

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 2 hours ago

It kinda already has. WW3 just hasn't gotten to the Total War + Nukes phase yet.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

There are four Republicans more reliable than this Democrat.

[–] JTT@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let me guess....he voted not to limit his war powers?

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

correct

cast the deciding vote against the latest effort to limit President Donald Trump’s ability to attack Iran

Parties (and/or the people) really need a way to recall member that runs on bad faith and switches after elections. From Sinema to Fetterman, there's always at least one fraud in the DNC.