this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
139 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29778 readers
1696 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. John Fetterman’s latest high-profile vote backing Donald Trump angered Democrats, who lambasted him as “shameful” and a “traitor.”

On Wednesday, Fetterman again voted to block another war powers resolution to constrain Trump’s authority to wage war on Iran without congressional approval.

It was the seventh time Democrats have attempted to rein in Trump’s power.

This time, however, Fetterman was the deciding vote after three Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins and Rand Paul — supported it.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Well, don't just call him a traitor. Treat him as such.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Vote that sack of shit out of office.

[–] isaaclw@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

There needs to be a way to recall them.

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

Asshole. Complete asshole. Dude should be thrown out of Congress for the campaign he ran in PA primaries and then the general. I mean Dr. Oz would have been worse but at this point by how much. Everything is fucked.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 19 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Wait a minute, I just dug into this.

A Dude got voted in on certain principles and ideology.

He then suffer's a brain injury that completely changes his ideology,

And there's no referendum planned?

WTF America?

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Go to the Pennsylvania community and find out that he was always like this but covered up to get elected. When it came down to it it was either him to Dr Oz. The stroke really has nothing to do with it.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, timeline's off. He had a stroke before being elected.

US Senators have no recall mechanism. Fetterman is up for reelection in 2028. We will see what happens then.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He's going to switch parties. I guarantee it

[–] andrewmsc@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

he is pro lgbtq+ and pro choice so i doubt that very much

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Honestly I hope he does, it’s not like he can win a Dem or Republican primary now lol

Does it really matter?

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Fetterman has certainly been acting more erratic since his stroke, but he actually wasn't as progressive as people wanted to believe. He was always a hard-core Israel supporter, and he once held a black jogger at gunpoint because he saw a black man running and assumed he committed a crime.

Also, there is nothing the voters can do to remove a sitting Senator. The only way for him to be removed is for two-thirds of the Senate to expel him, which isn't going to happen. Depending on Pennsylvania's laws, either the Governor would appoint a Senator until the next election, which the Republicans wouldn't support because they like Fetterman fucking over the Democrats, or Pennsylvania would have to hold a special election, which the Democrats wouldn't like because it would leave them short a vote for weeks (maybe months), and an unreliable vote is better than no vote. Either way, you're not going to find 67 Senators willing to expel him.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You mean like a recall?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

America needs recall elections.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

We have nothing we can do

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but some tea smugglers were able to increase their profit margins. All that "creating a functioning government" stuff was just an afterthought.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

I love how Americans today are we have no options but their stories of founding is then causing shit and fighting the man. Bit their founding stories are so over blown and fictionalized its pathetic.

[–] BouteilleBrune@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Almost 60% americans are against the war, it truly is the #1 democracy.

And they'll stay true to themselves, they won't learn anything from anything ever. I bet some of them will even be asking for a third term.

Their arrogance is well deserved, USA! USA! USA! The land of the free hahaha

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Fetterman IS a traitor.

[–] Red_October@piefed.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fetterman has been called a traitor for a lot longer than that. Ever since the brain damage, he's betrayed everything he was supposedly supporting when elected. That sack of shit can't fuck off fast enough and the moment his ass is out of office I hope and expect he finds he doesn't have a friend in the world.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude went around doing a press tour talking about how the brain damage made him less progressive.

That alone should have had us trigger some mechanism to determine if he's fit for duty.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He was never a progressive. The media labeled him that and voters all went "oh ok voted" without looking at his history.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean it was either him or Mehmet fucking Oz.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Excellent point! Forgot about that.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know, Fetterman has talked openly about his struggles with suicidal ideation. Just saying, with the right letter campaign, we might be able to solve this one.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Considering his less than ideal body shape, it's also not unreasonable to hope for a major cardiovascular event

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Well, we could start sending him some red meat gift baskets, but it might get a little pricey.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn't I hear that he got brain damage or something like that AFTER becoming a senator?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stroke so yes technically speaking he did. He was like this before but you are correct.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I was sort of under the impression that he had changed partway through, but perhaps he was like a Tulsi Gabbard in the end.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I wish there was some mechanism to remove him from office earlier. Vote of no confidence, Some sort of lawsuit, Breach of voter representation

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Recall elections at the federal level

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Please Democratic leadership wanted him to vote this way. If they wanted they could hold his feet in the fire and vote party line. Also keep him from commite seats etc. Since none that happens its because he doing what they want him to do.

[–] Switorik@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Words alone have lost all meaning, we need action.

Are they going to do anything about it or say he's a traitor today and then keep working with him like normal the next day? I'm starting to think they support the Republicans with all this inaction.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Because the brain-damaged cunt is

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh my God! They called him a traitor? That must have serious implications...right?

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Until next time, where he gets to do the same thing and democrats will claim they can't do anything because they have no power and then go on to cash their cheques from their benefactors.

[–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why doesn't he join MAGA at this point? Why is he still in D party?

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

If he changes parties then he's just another (R) senator.

His current position as spoiler maximises the amount of attention/power/leverage/bribes he can receive.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago

He can't read the paperwork.