this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
18 points (100.0% liked)

Today I Learned

29736 readers
133 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

True 'skeletonization' also includes the trimming away of any non-essential metal on the bridge, plate, wheel train or any other mechanical part of the watch, leaving only a minimalist 'bare' skeleton of the movement required for functionality.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InterestingUsername@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago

That really cool

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

TIL there's a fancy name for "replacing the back plate with glass."

[–] TheOldSpencer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Clear bottom case is different from skeleton. The watchface is specifically designed for see through, as are mechanical parts.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Luxury brands have to somehow find a way to make the most mundane shit seem complex to justify their prices.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who even wears watches anymore anyway? Oh right, people with too much money.

I've read that around 6 years ago many influencers bought high end watches and then the market crashed 2022. So your 80k something watch is worth 40k after that. And they didn't wear them, straight to bank after the sale.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

people who want to know the time without relying on a glass slab the size of a sandwich?

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world -1 points 1 day ago

Analog watches are cheap af and don't need to be replaced like phones. 🤦‍♂️

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago

Now wait till they learn about Skeleton Witch.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Back when my wife and i were dating I kept talking about wanting a skeleton watch, but I never thought to communicate what that was, and didn't know why she was always so profoundly unenthused by something I was showing interest in, it was unlike her. She was much happier about it when my folks got me one for x-mas and she found out it it was not, in fact, a watch decorated with skeletons, lmao.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

high-end watches are crazy. this is a 500 grand jacob & co astronomia:

they have tons of these, all with free-floating three-axis tourbillions.

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

could someone recommend a good cheap starter?

I'm always over stimulated by the choice and want something nice and quality for the money.

Is 200 too cheap?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

I'm happy with my Seiko 5. It was like 90$ when I got it 7-8 years ago. It took a bit for it to "wear in" but now it keeps time for months without me having to set it.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some companies have mechanical watches in the 400-500€ range that can go for 200€ used. I have a Junkers that I bought used for 200€ some years ago, and it's got a glass bottom (other models do, too). But honestly, I wouldn't make this a criterion, because you rarely see the back, and skeleton watches can sometimes look tacky.

Y'all talk about junkers at that price‽ Lol. Let me introduce you to my $12 Hamilton knockoff!

[–] user_name@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This just maked me want to bring back clear-plastic electronics.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not super interesting looking except for the visible antennas and connectors.

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've never sesn a post that made me so ready to spend money before

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They aren't too expensive really, and I think it's a great thing for people to have something like this that doesn't rely on anything digital at all.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay neat but why? Does look practically to tell time. Reminds me the time the Fossil Watch store sold sundail watches.

[–] Mesophar@pawb.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why is for aesthetics. I have a pocket watch like this. I think the gear work is beautiful in its own way, and the front of it is like any normal watch face (just with a transparent face so you can see behind it).

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

My pocketwatch: