this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
22 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84890 readers
3037 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nadram@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

No surprise really, that was always part of the deal. Google and Meta are relatively good buyers, if you consider that our data is also being sold to dark companies we've never heard of, or are difficult to trace back to their owners, or have hazy political involvement etc... Tech companies big or small will sell our data to whomever pays - see terms and conditions or whatever.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

OpenAI, selling its users out while still not making a profit 🤣.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They had most perfect business plan, buy hardware at massively inflated prices in order to provide a service that they sell for a loss to a customer base that doesn't exist.

How did that not work out for them?

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Accused of"?

That's how this stuff works. That's its purpose. Google is a data broker, as is most of Big Tech.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would have thought the personal data would flow in the opposite direction tbh

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It flows in all directions

[–] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Much like the rancid toilet bowl it is.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)


was it you who was doing the inappropriate bathroom wall art?

[–] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In most restrooms, I make a conscious effort to avoid touching every surface.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's probably good. I've been in most bathrooms. Those bowls are not safe to eat out of

[–] alakey@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol. Your mom is accused of handing over your intimate personal information to your dad and grandma.

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Day drinking?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that's how they learn not to share intimate and personal data with the billionaires, then that's how they learn.

I'm not surprised there are stupid and gullible people in the world. But, I am scared about how many there seem to be, now. Also, I was just reading /r/teachers wherein a teacher told a story about a 15-year-old who didn't understand how Leonardo DiCaprio could be in Romeo and Juliette because the play was written 500 years ago. Just clueless. If you want to remain optimistic about our future, do NOT read /r/teachers.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that's how they learn not to share intimate and personal data with the billionaires, then that's how they learn.

Let's not engage in blaming the victims.

There's no reason to treat the behavior of these corporations as if it were normal and inevitable, like they were a force of nature or something. Put all the blame where it belongs, on the people running these companies.

[–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, but what?

If I give you my page and tell you to enter your credit card details in, why would you do it?

Why do people need to tell everything to the agreeing website?

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If I give you my page and tell you to enter your credit card details in, why would you do it?

Because I'm paying for something?

Why do people need to tell everything to the agreeing website?

I don't know, it's probably circumstantial.

Probably a lot of the data being shared is from chats, but not necessarily all of it. We know that OpenAI scrapes the Internet at large for training data, which would include data sets of publicly leaked PII (such as the OPM breach). It's entirely possible that the data OpenAI is sharing about users was not given to them voluntarily by those users, but has simply been aggregated, analyzed and correlated by their AI tools.

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

If it's public, it's a given that Facebook and Google has all of that on you already.

It's almost a decade since Zucc said in front of congress that they do shadow profiles, LLMs are not going to change that.

What I do worry about is all personal stuff people overshare to the LLMs. From health, mental to financial and other secrets.